Snack WWars (Game Thread)

Started by kaydubs
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
Zenge142 said:
The number in the chart is the final sum of those up to this point, more or less. (I might be off with a couple +'s/-'s here or there but it should be mostly accurate.
Click to expand...
tbh I'm not sure how to use this. It's super impressive (and pretty!) but I'm a little lost
 
beans2020 said:
tbh I'm not sure how to use this. It's super impressive (and pretty!) but I'm a little lost
Click to expand...
I find the data useful.

For example when you look at Clem you can see he doesn't have a net negative interaction with a single living player in this game except for SAR and even then just barely.
 
Zenge142 said:
I find the data useful.

For example when you look at Clem you can see he doesn't have a net negative interaction with a single living player in this game except for SAR and even then just barely.
Click to expand...
And that correlation tells you that anyone who had negative interactions with him gets killed?
 
Zenge142 said:
I find the data useful.

For example when you look at Clem you can see he doesn't have a net negative interaction with a single living player in this game except for SAR and even then just barely.
Click to expand...
Actually other than me, SQB also doesn't have any net negative interactions with living players, other than Kitz and again even then just slightly
 
kitzsuna said:
And that correlation tells you that anyone who had negative interactions with him gets killed?
Click to expand...
Well it tells me that no one alive in this game is feeling "pushed" by Clem currently.

The Sar thing was from D1 when he was sheeping me, so even that's moot.
 
kitzsuna said:
…does this mean I’m in danger
Click to expand...
No, digging into the data there was just a single negative comment from SQB about you from Day 2.

Other than that, (and the fake claim against me of course) SQB doesn't have a sum total of negative actions against any living player.
 
Zenge142 said:
View attachment 415219

The names across the top are players and their posts. The names on the side are the subject of the posts.

Up to this point.

Positive posts "I think so and so is village" gets +1, as well as "unvotes".
Negative posts get -1 as well as votes.

The number in the chart is the final sum of those up to this point, more or less. (I might be off with a couple +'s/-'s here or there but it should be mostly accurate.
Click to expand...
F Sanck
 
Alright, how are we feeling about 7/9 of us voting scream w/ 4 hours to close? Clem isn't back and scream doesn't really have a good self-prez option, but I have to think in a game this size we have at least 3 wolves, so who is bussing this early?
 
_rae_ said:
Alright, how are we feeling about 7/9 of us voting scream w/ 4 hours to close? Clem isn't back and scream doesn't really have a good self-prez option, but I have to think in a game this size we have at least 3 wolves, so who is bussing this early?
Click to expand...
200.gif
 
_rae_ said:
Alright, how are we feeling about 7/9 of us voting scream w/ 4 hours to close? Clem isn't back and scream doesn't really have a good self-prez option, but I have to think in a game this size we have at least 3 wolves, so who is bussing this early?
Click to expand...
Dubz or zenge but the zenge claims give me pause
 
_rae_ said:
Alright, how are we feeling about 7/9 of us voting scream w/ 4 hours to close? Clem isn't back and scream doesn't really have a good self-prez option, but I have to think in a game this size we have at least 3 wolves, so who is bussing this early?
Click to expand...
I think the writing was on the wall for scream like, yesterday. Hence the attempt to frame Zenge. So I don't think we get any useful analysis from the vote today unfortunately.
 
WildZoo said:
In favor of pew pew at screams: Clem


Not in favor of pew pew at screams: screams, chic, beans


Noncommital: rae, kitz, vampy


No comment at all: Zenge, SAR
Click to expand...
Also this post is entirely unpairing for SQB/Dubz.

Packmate Dubz would never make this post.
 
Zenge142 said:
:corny:
Click to expand...
Mostly just that he was the first to suggest shooting her. And I think he was on her vote with you d2?

I do remember him having her lock town, arguing with me about his ability to read her, and then very quickly dropping her from that town core at...some point. So idk I could see that being a tactic change because of thread vibes about her slot, maybe.

I don't remember how Clem tends to treat packmates, been a while since I've seen him wolf.
 
WildZoo said:
Mostly just that he was the first to suggest shooting her. And I think he was on her vote with you d2?
Click to expand...
Distancing for the first when it honestly seemed like you were fibbing about having a shot at all.

For the second he was in a bit of an awkward situation where he was willing to follow me, but not on SQB? Which I pressed him on and he said SQB was in his town core, which he relented on since he didn't have a good reason to have SQB in the town core by his own admission, and only then did her vote her.

This data is pretty damning.
Zenge142 said:
1770843816123.png
Click to expand...
Aside from still being at a net positive on SQB, what's abundantly clear here is that he's trying to hard to not make any enemies. With the exception of SAR, which only exists from sheeping me D1, Clem has not one single net negative unilateral interactions total (NNUIT) with any living player. That's not normal. That's not a village spread.
 
Zenge142 said:
Distancing for the first when it honestly seemed like you were fibbing about having a shot at all.

For the second he was in a bit of an awkward situation where he was willing to follow me, but not on SQB? Which I pressed him on and he said SQB was in his town core, which he relented on since he didn't have a good reason to have SQB in the town core by his own admission, and only then did her vote her.

This data is pretty damning.

Aside from still being at a net positive on SQB, what's abundantly clear here is that he's trying to hard to not make any enemies. With the exception of SAR, which only exists from sheeping me D1, Clem has not one single net negative unilateral interactions total (NNUIT) with any living player. That's not normal. That's not a village spread.
Click to expand...
That's logical

I'm just upset he said to my face that I'm easy to pocket. The audacity!
 
Zenge142 said:
View attachment 415219

The names across the top are players and their posts. The names on the side are the subject of the posts.

Up to this point.

Positive posts "I think so and so is village" gets +1, as well as "unvotes".
Negative posts get -1 as well as votes.

The number in the chart is the final sum of those up to this point, more or less. (I might be off with a couple +'s/-'s here or there but it should be mostly accurate.
Click to expand...
I'm looking at this more closely and there's so much parent/child violence

samac and Spurs

Zenge and fruit

Me and apop 😭
 
WildZoo said:
Why am I last of the village reads sad_angry
Click to expand...
Well
- Vampy has to be town mechanically as a Mason
- Rae has to be village since she vouched for my night action - if she was wolfing with SQB she could have lied, gotten village to yeet me, and potentially won the game
- SAR you village read yourself! Which is more heavily weighted because regardless of your affiliation, I know I can trust your SAR read to be accurate here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.