-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
- Home
- Forums
- Physician and Resident Communities (MD / DO)
- Emergency Medicine
- Medical Toxicology (MD, DO, PharmD)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
snake bite venom "extractor kit"?
Started by Zback
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I was always under the impression that these things were a joke, but heard somebody mention it today. Do they actually work?
Nope. Those venom extractor kits just suck (bah-dum-a-dum <rimshot>). d=)
Sorry couldn't resist. Here's something more appropriate for the discussion: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14747805/?
Cheers!
-d
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
Heard they were also good for bot fly removal, but have no actual evidence to support that....
In my wilderness medicine elective, we were taught to tell anyone who had one to throw it away. Useless.
D
deleted109597
Nope. Those venom extractor kits just suck (bah-dum-a-dum <rimshot>). d=)
Don't steal the man's joke (unless you're Sean)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14747806
Don't steal the man's joke (unless you're Sean)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14747806
Not sean, and totally give credit to him... forgot where I'd read it before. d=)
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
D
deleted109597
Not sean, and totally give credit to him... forgot where I'd read it before. d=)
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
It's all good. Although you should change your location from the windy city to the submerged city.
What's your take on Eric Lavonas' consensus document on snakebites? Some of the criticism of the old severity scoring was that it wasn't validated, but technically, neither is the consensus statement.
Do you think it sets people in high liability states to have to give more CroFab to copperhead bites?
It's all good. Although you should change your location from the windy city to the submerged city.
What's your take on Eric Lavonas' consensus document on snakebites? Some of the criticism of the old severity scoring was that it wasn't validated, but technically, neither is the consensus statement.
Do you think it sets people in high liability states to have to give more CroFab to copperhead bites?
I like Eric's take... I think it's validated for clearly appropriately identified bites; but rather than push people to have to give, I think it adds a layer of defense if it's given, as anaphylaxis is a real concern.
Also, gaining & maintaining control is easier earlier, so pulling the trigger sooner (theoretically) requires fewer doses - cost containment - vs waiting until effects are clearly present is a risk/benefit issue. Eric's paper defends this practice, and tries to set up a construct for better studies to actually look at validatable outcomes.
Cheers!
-d
PS - we're mostly dried out now... only the low lying ex-swamps are still, well, swamped. d=)
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk