-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Special masters
Started by ajk1897
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
SMPs are usually for students who have completed prerequisite courses but don't have a great GPA so a post-bac program wouldn't make a ton of sense. You will need to perform well in an SMP as poor performance is worse for your application than applying without one.
What year are you? Do you have the opportunity to take upper level science courses? If so, you might not need an SMP.
What year are you? Do you have the opportunity to take upper level science courses? If so, you might not need an SMP.
See my response from your first thread that you posted where I answered this question twice, directly.
Sure, a 3.5 uGPA is still considered average and sub-competitive for most MD schools.. but some low-tiered it's decent and the chances for applicants with that GPA in combination with 512+ MCAT have 60-70% historical acceptance rates. SMPs again are extreme measures for candidates with GPAs <3.0 that have no other options. SMP for someone in your position is a very unnecessary risk and I would recommend that you look into these options discussed (e.g. postbacc, how that affects uGPA, SMPs, etc.) to get a better understanding of your options/my advice.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I am graduating in August. Those are the only prerequisites I haven't taken. None of my other grades are less than a C of which I have 2.SMPs are usually for students who have completed prerequisite courses but don't have a great GPA so a post-bac program wouldn't make a ton of sense. You will need to perform well in an SMP as poor performance is worse for your application than applying without one.
What year are you? Do you have the opportunity to take upper level science courses? If so, you might not need an SMP.
I have read your response and it makes sense. I put this question in the wrong place with the original post. I was just trying to see if anyone is in a similar situation.See my response from your first thread that you posted where I answered this question twice, directly.
D
deleted935885
You honestly don't need it. Just take the courses that you have left and your good to go.
But at the end of the day, do you.
But at the end of the day, do you.
D
deleted1041468
Who are these programs designed for? I have a 3.5 cGPA and hope to have a 3.3 sGPA after completing organic chemistry and biochemistry.
I would never get a “special” degree unless I have a poor gpa which in my opinion yours is good not excellent but definitely good. Only get degrees that help your career/income. If you want to be a doctor of some sort. If you do fine on the entry exam your gpa will suffice.
MSDirector
New Member
It's not just about the GPA, the SMPs allow the medical faculty to get to know the applicant, and the applicant can demonstrate he or she can handle the stress and workload.
It's not just about the GPA, the SMPs allow the medical faculty to get to know the applicant, and the applicant can demonstrate he or she can handle the stress and workload.
Sure, required for applicants <3.0. But >3.0 shouldn't spend sickening amounts of money ~50-60K for a "special" masters that just lets faculty get to know them. That's a very overpriced networking entry fee.
MSDirector
New Member
Sure, required for applicants <3.0. But >3.0 shouldn't spend sickening amounts of money ~50-60K for a "special" masters that just lets faculty get to know them. That's a very overpriced networking entry fee.
I agree ... a one year MS for ~$21 in an affordable area is fair.