- Joined
- Jan 18, 2012
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 0
I had accidentally received a WU in a class when I only attended the first two weeks. The professor knows about this and understands the situation considering I received an A on her first two quizzes.
This quarter I received an A in the same class with another professor. So now I have a WU and an A on my transcript which looks like I repeated the class unfortunately.
My question is, would it be better to have the first professor switch my WU to an F instead so that the A can count as a grade replacement? Or would it be better to leave the WU as is.
I emailed AACOM and they said a WU would not be replaceable as it was not an actual score.
This leads me to wonder about the human element of this entire concept of grade replacement. Does the F look better or does the WU look better?
On one side of the coin, I am grateful for the higher GPA that grade replacement can give, but on the other side, I wonder how admissions feel when they see courses repeated for a better grade.
The two thought processes I imagine are:
This student showed initiative and did well.
or
Of course they would do better the second time around, they saw this material twice. They shouldn't be rewarded when others did well the first time around.
This quarter I received an A in the same class with another professor. So now I have a WU and an A on my transcript which looks like I repeated the class unfortunately.
My question is, would it be better to have the first professor switch my WU to an F instead so that the A can count as a grade replacement? Or would it be better to leave the WU as is.
I emailed AACOM and they said a WU would not be replaceable as it was not an actual score.
This leads me to wonder about the human element of this entire concept of grade replacement. Does the F look better or does the WU look better?
On one side of the coin, I am grateful for the higher GPA that grade replacement can give, but on the other side, I wonder how admissions feel when they see courses repeated for a better grade.
The two thought processes I imagine are:
This student showed initiative and did well.
or
Of course they would do better the second time around, they saw this material twice. They shouldn't be rewarded when others did well the first time around.