- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 80
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Medical Student

mzztiffany said:would a recent speeding ticket that i will go to court for in aug. (first one i have ever gotten...last week)... constitutes as "been convicted of a felnoy or misdemonor in any jurisdiction?"
mzztiffany said:would a recent speeding ticket that i will go to court for in aug. (first one i have ever gotten...last week)... constitutes as "been convicted of a felnoy or misdemonor in any jurisdiction?"
dr.z said:It is civil infraction. Less than a misdemeanor.
stretch210 said:Don't even bother applying to DO schools, only MD programs accept people with speeding tickets. 😉

stretch210 said:Don't even bother applying to DO schools, only MD programs accept people with speeding tickets. 😉
MedSchoolFool said:ACTUALLY....
If you live in Delaware (like I do) then a traffic violation is listed as a CRIMINAL offense. You would therefore have a criminal record.
I know this sounds about ******ed....the legislative body in Delaware is actually in session right now in order to finally amend this idiotic mess they have created. They are working to change traffic violations to civil offenses rather than criminal acts.
In the meantime, don't get a ticket in Delaware.
It'sElectric said:Wow, it's been awhile since I had to go through the whole application process, but I just remembered something. Most (i'm not sure if all) of the applications I recall filling out asked if I had any felonies/misdemeanors, not including minor traffic violations such as speeding tickets. It was usually in parentheses next to the actual question. Do they not have that on there now?

mzztiffany said:would a recent speeding ticket that i will go to court for in aug. (first one i have ever gotten...last week)... constitutes as "been convicted of a felnoy or misdemonor in any jurisdiction?"
Barts said:It only states to exclude parking violations. I'm sure they don't give a **** about a speeding ticket, and the OP is way too paranoid. My guess would be they don't state to exclude moving violations (or even minor traffic violations) because of DUI's and the like. You would probably have some goofball not list a DUI then get caught for it and try to say they felt it was a minor traffic violation so didn't list it.
![]()
Barts said:It only states to exclude parking violations. I'm sure they don't give a **** about a speeding ticket, and the OP is way too paranoid. My guess would be they don't state to exclude moving violations (or even minor traffic violations) because of DUI's and the like. You would probably have some goofball not list a DUI then get caught for it and try to say they felt it was a minor traffic violation so didn't list it.
![]()
Hardbody said:I am pretty sure that a DUI is at least a misdemeanor in EVERY state.
Hardbody said:Are you referring to LECOM's secondary? That is funny because I took it to mean something different.
It states: "Have you ever been convicted of, or been arrested for, a crime which is classified as a misdemeanor or felony (excluding parking violations)?
I am not an english major but I read felony or misdemeanor as being explicit (they did not state ANY OFFENSE) and the excluding parking violations to be implicit. My guess is that they probably had a couple of goodie two shoes send them records of a parking violation, and they probably want to avoid this headache in the future. I highly doubt that they want you to send them records of any p!ss ant moving violations that you have recieved, that would be ridicolous.
Hardbody said:I am pretty sure that a DUI is at least a misdemeanor in EVERY state.
mzztiffany said:yeah well i basically said no.
I mean Im not "Technically" convicted yet and it wasn't a reckless or nething. man i was pretty mad when i got it cause it was the same day i got my mcat scores ... yeah im guessing everyone put NO b/c its not considered much of anything if its not a reckless (cept deleware) and I actually think i was referring to LECOM even though i didnt state it. I was looking at the secondaries and thats one of the questions I saw...but I also saw it on a bunch of other apps... (similarly stated)...thanks everyone.
Barts said:I agree-- and I never said that a DUI wasn't a misdemeanor in every state, you obviously didn't understand my post, try reading it again...but slower perhaps 😕
MSc44 said:I once got pulled over when i was drunk, long time ago, turns out my record is clean, and my insurance never found out, it all got reduced to a small traffic violation,
maybe it helpd that my lawyer was very well known here on long island
so i doubt any of this will effect me.
i blew a 0.11 😱 real stupid mistake 👎 , i had just turned 21........$5000 later and one pissed off MD father and i learned my lesson. WE all make mistakes
i thank my luckey star's every day no one was hurt as a result of this careless choice
mzztiffany said:yeah well i basically said no.
I mean Im not "Technically" convicted yet and it wasn't a reckless or nething. man i was pretty mad when i got it cause it was the same day i got my mcat scores ... yeah im guessing everyone put NO b/c its not considered much of anything if its not a reckless (cept deleware) and I actually think i was referring to LECOM even though i didnt state it. I was looking at the secondaries and thats one of the questions I saw...but I also saw it on a bunch of other apps... (similarly stated)...thanks everyone.
Barts said:So yeah, had it been ages ago I'm sure you were able to get it pleaded down. And I'm not sure, but I don't believe most courts are very receptive anymore to pleading down DUI's to some bs charge.
scpod said:The key to pleading down is having money. Our judicial system rewards those people who have enough money to retain a good lawyer. Our courts are jammed and prosecutors are flooded with cases. There's no way they could all go to trial. Pleading is what most trial lawyers do these days. If you "pay into the system" you will be rewarded. Yes, the courts have cracked down on DUI, but it's mostly those folks who can't afford a good lawyer who are receiving all that "justice" and jail time.
Just a quick comment on this because the "not "Technically" convicted" jumped out at me (we got a lecture about this on my first day last year). The reason schools are asking about criminal stuff is largely because of drugs, DUI and DEA licenses. The big concern is that now a days the DEA can (and does) refuse to issue you a DEA # if you have prior drug or alcohol convictions. A DUI or an underage consumption that you got in your teens can come back to haunt you when it comes time to get a license. It sucks, but that's what's going on now. Speeding tickets etc aren't a big deal and schools would much rather you just be honest about it then trying to cover it up. To a school (and more importantly to state boards) a pending charge can be just as big of a red flag as a conviction. Unfortunately the presumption of innocence doesn't carry over into medicine.mzztiffany said:yeah well i basically said no.
I mean Im not "Technically" convicted yet and it wasn't a reckless or nething. man i was pretty mad when i got it cause it was the same day i got my mcat scores ... yeah im guessing everyone put NO b/c its not considered much of anything if its not a reckless (cept deleware) and I actually think i was referring to LECOM even though i didnt state it. I was looking at the secondaries and thats one of the questions I saw...but I also saw it on a bunch of other apps... (similarly stated)...thanks everyone.