SPOILER!…No one wants to practice clinical medicine

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

gaseous_clay

New Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
614

Members don't see this ad.
 
Probably not important. Medical students are as about aware of how the real world operates as college students are. They can say and think whatever they want for now. It's guaranteed to change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
But they are usually in too much debt to quit. It’s disheartening to think future generations who will be taking care of me don’t want to do it in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
M4 here, can say most of my classmates think this way. Seems as if most students now either want to do anesthesia, rads, IM subspecialty, optho, or quit and do consulting or go into industry as most will not be competitive for these fields.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
It might be a good idea to go into the fields that most of your friends and colleagues don't want to go into. Should provide a nice lopsided demand for your services as you progress in your career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
It might be a good idea to go into the fields that most of your friends and colleagues don't want to go into. Should provide a nice lopsided demand for your services as you progress in your career.
Specifically ones where you can run your own practice.
I see this leading to shifting primary care and other specialties to apns and foreign docs. The foreign docs who choose to come here will be the ones who will most self sacrifice and likely to open a private clinic. The lazy Americans will just clock in-out and keep working just hard enough to keep their job
 
M4 here, can say most of my classmates think this way. Seems as if most students now either want to do anesthesia, rads, IM subspecialty, optho, or quit and do consulting or go into industry as most will not be competitive for these fields.

It's funny because in the early 00's you couldn't give away anesthesia slots and in the 80's radiology was among the least competitive programs to match into.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
It's funny because in the early 00's you couldn't give away anesthesia slots and in the 80's radiology was among the least competitive programs to match into.
Psych and FM demanding big bucks these day…
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
It's funny because in the early 00's you couldn't give away anesthesia slots and in the 80's radiology was among the least competitive programs to match into.
In 1999 when I did a med school radiology rotation, there was a vocal subset of radiology residents that had quit IM internship to do radiology and loved it. They all recommended I do the same thing.
I found radiology fascinating (which is why I did the elective), but sitting in those dark rooms reviewing images by myself all day was not a good match for my personality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I feel like cash practices are gonna get way more popular, while insurance practices will be for the poor only.
That only works for certain specialties. Hard to pay for advanced imaging and hospital based services with cash.
 
In 1999 when I did a med school radiology rotation, there was a vocal subset of radiology residents that had quit IM internship to do radiology and loved it. They all recommended I do the same thing.
I found radiology fascinating (which is why I did the elective), but sitting in those dark rooms reviewing images by myself all day was not a good match for my personality.
I did a neuroradiology rotational in fellowship. All they did was make fun of people. “35 y/o FF with hx of back pain radiating to the LE.”
FF = fat f**k
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I did a neuroradiology rotational in fellowship. All they did was make fun of people. “35 y/o FF with hx of back pain radiating to the LE.”
FF = fat f**k
People that do radiology aren’t exactly known for compassion. This is not surprising at all

When I’m using my 7inch quickie on said patient, I’m thinking to myself the same thing…but outwardly I’m quite high on the “compassion” scale..
 
It might be a good idea to go into the fields that most of your friends and colleagues don't want to go into. Should provide a nice lopsided demand for your services as you progress in your career.
Don't agree, the fields no one wants to do anymore are EM, peds, FM, and general IM as seen in the ERAS data trends.
EM and peds do not have bright futures, FM has concierge medicine, but with less effort you can make more in surgical subspecialties, rads, derm, GI, cards, heme/onc etc. Along with the explosion of new and evolving EMR reqs and the inbox, there's a reason certain fields are competitive amongst med students.
Psych and FM demanding big bucks these day…
In concierge, yes, but still far and few between and can get over-saturated very quickly. And even so, they still make less than the competitive fields out of med school
In 1999 when I did a med school radiology rotation, there was a vocal subset of radiology residents that had quit IM internship to do radiology and loved it. They all recommended I do the same thing.
I found radiology fascinating (which is why I did the elective), but sitting in those dark rooms reviewing images by myself all day was not a good match for my personality.
More to radiology than that
That only works for certain specialties. Hard to pay for advanced imaging and hospital based services with cash.
Concierge radiology is becoming a thing (whole-body MRI for XXX), also rads has only expanded residency spots by 14% since 2000 leading to a massive shortage, can strong-arm hospitals and insurance- other specialties with shortages like GI and heme/onc can do the same.
I did a neuroradiology rotational in fellowship. All they did was make fun of people. “35 y/o FF with hx of back pain radiating to the LE.”
FF = fat f**k
People that do radiology aren’t exactly known for compassion. This is not surprising at all

When I’m using my 7inch quickie on said patient, I’m thinking to myself the same thing…but outwardly I’m quite high on the “compassion” scale..
There are jerks in every specialty

Edit: Also even if all USMD students don't want to pursue EM, FM, peds, gen IM, those spots will be filled by IMGs or weaker DO students, which prevents any supply/demand correction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
That only works for certain specialties. Hard to pay for advanced imaging and hospital based services with cash.
For hospital care that's true at the present time in the US bc our system is explicitly designed around the concept of insurance. But I think there is general agreement that needs to change.

I've gotten several MRIs and paid with cash bc not worth the insurance hoops.

I've been hearing a lot lately about Bumrungrad hospital in Bangkok. Americans who have been treated there have been blown away by the care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
For hospital care that's true at the present time in the US bc our system is explicitly designed around the concept of insurance. But I think there is general agreement that needs to change.

I've gotten several MRIs and paid with cash bc not worth the insurance hoops.

I've been hearing a lot lately about Bumrungrad hospital in Bangkok. Americans who have been treated there have been blown away by the care.
Cash pay only hospital? How does this breakdown?
 
You can Google the hospital, they have packages for everything. I don't know how it goes for emergency care but I think the basic thing is they charge cash for high quality service and don't provide care if you can't pay. Simple model.

Since there's no socialism component, no government mandates on who to provide care to, and no mass leverage insurance companies bargaining the price down, it's exactly the kind of ultra high quality product you would expect from free market capitalism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Don't agree, the fields no one wants to do anymore are EM, peds, FM, and general IM as seen in the ERAS data trends.
EM and peds do not have bright futures, FM has concierge medicine, but with less effort you can make more in surgical subspecialties, rads, derm, GI, cards, heme/onc etc. Along with the explosion of new and evolving EMR reqs and the inbox, there's a reason certain fields are competitive amongst med students.
I'm not sure. Things shift and cycle all of the time. Where are you in your training? Attending, resident, student?

I can tell you from having my own practice that EMR reqs are for every specialty. I'm also in the process of starting my own primary care clinic and I'm very happy that there are so few PCP providers. From a business perspective, I love it. When I need a PCP and have to wait a year to receive an appointment, it's not such a great thing. Just remember supply and demand and don't overthink it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I'm not sure. Things shift and cycle all of the time. Where are you in your training? Attending, resident, student?

I can tell you from having my own practice that EMR reqs are for every specialty. I'm also in the process of starting my own primary care clinic and I'm very happy that there are so few PCP providers. From a business perspective, I love it. When I need a PCP and have to wait a year to receive an appointment, it's not such a great thing. Just remember supply and demand and don't overthink it.
student (usmd m4) applying radiology this cycle
 
student (usmd m4) applying radiology this cycle
Unfortunately for me, I'm a bit further along than you are :( but trust me, everything in this world, from medicine to jobs to economies to fads to values to fashion, etc, shifts and cycles. You as well will eventually find this to be true.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Don’t forget ai
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Unfortunately for me, I'm a bit further along than you are :( but trust me, everything in this world, from medicine to jobs to economies to fads to values to fashion, etc, shifts and cycles. You as well will eventually find this to be true.


Agree, I think 8 years or so ago rads was an easy match. I think we will see less volatility with specialty desires now that schools have expanded so much and residency spots have stayed stagnant.
 
AI will be a good thing for radiology
Among other things, AI can identify a person with facial recognition from an infant to an adult. Out of curiosity, if AI can do this do you think it will also be able to ID normal vs pathological findings on imaging studies? If yes, it shouldn't take much for AI to write a report. If that's the case, would radiology centers be able to reduce the number of radiologists required to read imaging studies? Perhaps just have one guy breeze through images and reports to make sure nothing is missed and to confirm findings. If this happens and studies show there are no differences in outcomes it might not be such a bright future for radiology. Hypothetical of course but I'm curious if this is a likely possibility.
 
AI will be a good thing for radiology
I went to an urgent care last summer for my daughter and an AI read her xray. They of course looked at it themselves and were going to send out to radiology for a proper report, but if this continues to advance (which it will), I would think that AI is going to be very bad for radiology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Among other things, AI can identify a person with facial recognition from an infant to an adult. Out of curiosity, if AI can do this do you think it will also be able to ID normal vs pathological findings on imaging studies? If yes, it shouldn't take much for AI to write a report. If that's the case, would radiology centers be able to reduce the number of radiologists required to read imaging studies? Perhaps just have one guy breeze through images and reports to make sure nothing is missed and to confirm findings. If this happens and studies show there are no differences in outcomes it might not be such a bright future for radiology. Hypothetical of course but I'm curious if this is a likely possibility.
Most of rads isnt just ID normal vs abnormal, lots of different modalities and noise (AI is awful at artifacts and many experts say this problem is unsolvable) compared to a facial ID system. AI experts are actually now pretty positive about the future of radiology compared to the "AI godfather" who predicted rads would be a dead field in 5 years back in 2016. Also, lists are blowing up now with more and more mid-levels released to the wild pan ordering studies, as well as patients demanding imaging from their clinicians, or just weaker clinicians graduating and relying more on radiology.
I went to an urgent care last summer for my daughter and an AI read her xray. They of course looked at it themselves and were going to send out to radiology for a proper report, but if this continues to advance (which it will), I would think that AI is going to be very bad for radiology.
Most urgent cares have always just glanced at the plain films, gave their best guess at what it was, and sent patients on their way. Not hard to see an obvious fx or pneumonia on a plain film, any physician could do this. Reading plain films now in rads is probably equivalent to having a full schedule of procedures in a busy day as a pain doc and having one annoying patient messaging you about a gabapentin refill when they still have three weeks' supply left- its a very low priority compared to the numerous cross-sectional that need to be read on top of procedures. Also, a new study came out comparing AI vs human radiologists in detecting pneumothorax (which is very easy to see) on CXR and it flopped hard. This is probably the most "simple" imaging modality and finding involved within radiology, so I'm really not concerned about AI interpreting a spinal abnormality in T1 vs T2 and coming up with a DDx in my career, and if it does, by that point most of the medical field will be obsolete.
 
Don't agree, the fields no one wants to do anymore are EM, peds, FM, and general IM as seen in the ERAS data trends.
EM and peds do not have bright futures, FM has concierge medicine, but with less effort you can make more in surgical subspecialties, rads, derm, GI, cards, heme/onc etc. Along with the explosion of new and evolving EMR reqs and the inbox, there's a reason certain fields are competitive amongst med students.

In concierge, yes, but still far and few between and can get over-saturated very quickly. And even so, they still make less than the competitive fields out of med school

More to radiology than that

Concierge radiology is becoming a thing (whole-body MRI for XXX), also rads has only expanded residency spots by 14% since 2000 leading to a massive shortage, can strong-arm hospitals and insurance- other specialties with shortages like GI and heme/onc can do the same.


There are jerks in every specialty

Edit: Also even if all USMD students don't want to pursue EM, FM, peds, gen IM, those spots will be filled by IMGs or weaker DO students, which prevents any supply/demand correction.
Ridiculous. One of my (FM) partners broke 400k in his second year out of residency. Would have been faster but he had to start part time, also was fall of 2020...

Also, less effort? I work bankers hours, phone-only call every 6 weeks, never step foot in the hospital, work 8-4:15ish with a 90 minute lunch break, 4.5 days per week. Can take time off with basically zero notice if need be, will be taking 7 weeks off this year, short residency, no fellowship needed, and will easily clear 400k this year. There's not a full time doctor alive who works less than most FPs while making that kind of money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Ridiculous. One of my (FM) partners broke 400k in his second year out of residency. Would have been faster but he had to start part time, also was fall of 2020...

Also, less effort? I work bankers hours, phone-only call every 6 weeks, never step foot in the hospital, work 8-4:15ish with a 90 minute lunch break, 4.5 days per week. Can take time off with basically zero notice if need be, will be taking 7 weeks off this year, short residency, no fellowship needed, and will easily clear 400k this year. There's not a full time doctor alive who works less than most FPs while making that kind of money.
Derm, optho, ortho, rads, GI, gen cards all make significantly more per hour- the caveat is the training takes longer and some (like cards) have minimal control over their schedule. For me personally, performing a specific task of a specialist is/would be much less draining than practicing primary care. Primary care is a sweet gig for those who want it, for those who don't it sounds like pulling teeth (can say this about any field you're not interested in)
 
Ridiculous. One of my (FM) partners broke 400k in his second year out of residency. Would have been faster but he had to start part time, also was fall of 2020...

Also, less effort? I work bankers hours, phone-only call every 6 weeks, never step foot in the hospital, work 8-4:15ish with a 90 minute lunch break, 4.5 days per week. Can take time off with basically zero notice if need be, will be taking 7 weeks off this year, short residency, no fellowship needed, and will easily clear 400k this year. There's not a full time doctor alive who works less than most FPs while making that kind of money.


Help us understand what has changed? Are you and your FP friend employed by a hospital network?

Primary care didn’t pay that well 20 years ago when I finished medical school.

With reimbursements in the toilet, I don’t understand how one makes $$ in primary care unless they do concierge medicine or they are employed by a hospital system.

If it is hospital system employment, then it means these PCPs now make so much more money than in the past….due to their referrals to overpriced hospital labs, overpriced MRIs, both of which cost double the price of non hospital tests. 130% charges on clinic visits, and referrals to specialists only within hospital network who also extract similar $$$ from insurance companies for hospital priced service which dramatically drives up insurance costs for regular people, you know, your patients.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
It's funny because in the early 00's you couldn't give away anesthesia slots and in the 80's radiology was among the least competitive programs to match into.
I always thought the “ROAD” era was kind of at its height from the 90s-early 2000’s with Rads and Anesthesia being super popular and competitive? Their popularity and competitiveness seems to have slipped a good bit. Derm and Ophtho have stayed competitive forever.
 
I always thought the “ROAD” era was kind of at its height from the 90s-early 2000’s with Rads and Anesthesia being super popular and competitive? Their popularity and competitiveness seems to have slipped a good bit. Derm and Ophtho have stayed competitive forever.
Anesthesia and especially radiology have become quite a bit more competitive in the past couple years due to hot job markets. There was a slump in the 2010s for rads due to a crappy recession era job market. Ophtho and derm are always competitive in part because they are significantly smaller fields.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
For hospital care that's true at the present time in the US bc our system is explicitly designed around the concept of insurance. But I think there is general agreement that needs to change.

I've gotten several MRIs and paid with cash bc not worth the insurance hoops.

I've been hearing a lot lately about Bumrungrad hospital in Bangkok. Americans who have been treated there have been blown away by the care.
You’re a pain doc. You most likely make more than 99% of people in the United States. Your ability to pay cash for MRIs in not indicative of the rest of the U.S. population.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Don't agree, the fields no one wants to do anymore are EM, peds, FM, and general IM as seen in the ERAS data trends.
EM and peds do not have bright futures, FM has concierge medicine, but with less effort you can make more in surgical subspecialties, rads, derm, GI, cards, heme/onc etc. Along with the explosion of new and evolving EMR reqs and the inbox, there's a reason certain fields are competitive amongst med students.

In concierge, yes, but still far and few between and can get over-saturated very quickly. And even so, they still make less than the competitive fields out of med school

More to radiology than that

Concierge radiology is becoming a thing (whole-body MRI for XXX), also rads has only expanded residency spots by 14% since 2000 leading to a massive shortage, can strong-arm hospitals and insurance- other specialties with shortages like GI and heme/onc can do the same.


There are jerks in every specialty

Edit: Also even if all USMD students don't want to pursue EM, FM, peds, gen IM, those spots will be filled by IMGs or weaker DO students, which prevents any supply/demand correction.
An imaging center will go belly up if it relied purely on the concierge model. A 1.5T MRI coil costs a lot of money to set up and operate, even more costly in a CON state. There is one ‘concierge’ radiologist who has three sub-1 Tesla centers in my area, but
most of his revenue is from personal injury. This is not a sustainable model in most states.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
An imaging center will go belly up if it relied purely on the concierge model. A 1.5T MRI coil costs a lot of money to set up and operate, even more costly in a CON state. There is one ‘concierge’ radiologist who has three sub-1 Tesla centers in my area, but
most of his revenue is from personal injury. This is not a sustainable model in most states.
Maybe not yet. The place I got my ankle MRI specifically told me they encourage cash payers. $450, 3T machine, American radiologist read. I called about 5 places and the rates were all over the map.

The main stumbling block to cash is the unfair legal and negotiating leverage insurance and Medicare have. That completely corrupts the free market. It's a joke to call our health care system free market.

Even despite all this, it's still breaking through imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I always thought the “ROAD” era was kind of at its height from the 90s-early 2000’s with Rads and Anesthesia being super popular and competitive? Their popularity and competitiveness seems to have slipped a good bit. Derm and Ophtho have stayed competitive forever.

ROAD has been replaced with PROUD

PMR
Radiology
Optho
Urology
Derm
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
Most of rads isnt just ID normal vs abnormal, lots of different modalities and noise (AI is awful at artifacts and many experts say this problem is unsolvable) compared to a facial ID system. AI experts are actually now pretty positive about the future of radiology compared to the "AI godfather" who predicted rads would be a dead field in 5 years back in 2016. Also, lists are blowing up now with more and more mid-levels released to the wild pan ordering studies, as well as patients demanding imaging from their clinicians, or just weaker clinicians graduating and relying more on radiology.

Most urgent cares have always just glanced at the plain films, gave their best guess at what it was, and sent patients on their way. Not hard to see an obvious fx or pneumonia on a plain film, any physician could do this. Reading plain films now in rads is probably equivalent to having a full schedule of procedures in a busy day as a pain doc and having one annoying patient messaging you about a gabapentin refill when they still have three weeks' supply left- its a very low priority compared to the numerous cross-sectional that need to be read on top of procedures. Also, a new study came out comparing AI vs human radiologists in detecting pneumothorax (which is very easy to see) on CXR and it flopped hard. This is probably the most "simple" imaging modality and finding involved within radiology, so I'm really not concerned about AI interpreting a spinal abnormality in T1 vs T2 and coming up with a DDx in my career, and if it does, by that point most of the medical field will be obsolete.
You may or may not be right. I'm not sure since I've never thought about it prior to this discussion but don't overlook supply and demand. There's already a dearth of PCPs out there and if your friends are avoiding this specialty it'll likely only get worse. Yet, the demand will still be there. Same with ER docs, etc.

CMS values the importance of primary care and if they have to motivate people to enter this field they'll increase primary care code payments. If they do that, that money will come from other specialties. It's already happened.

I specialized in interventional pain and incorporated opioid dependency into my practice. Now I'm in the process of hiring primary care providers because the demand is so heavy. I would recommend anyone with an entrepreneurial spirit to consider what I'm saying as it may serve you very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
For hospital care that's true at the present time in the US bc our system is explicitly designed around the concept of insurance. But I think there is general agreement that needs to change.

I've gotten several MRIs and paid with cash bc not worth the insurance hoops.

I've been hearing a lot lately about Bumrungrad hospital in Bangkok. Americans who have been treated there have been blown away by the care.

You can Google the hospital, they have packages for everything. I don't know how it goes for emergency care but I think the basic thing is they charge cash for high quality service and don't provide care if you can't pay. Simple model.

Since there's no socialism component, no government mandates on who to provide care to, and no mass leverage insurance companies bargaining the price down, it's exactly the kind of ultra high quality product you would expect from free market capitalism.

so... you think highly of the Universal Healthcare System in thailand. interesting....

Universal health care is provided through three programs: the civil service welfare system for civil servants and their families, Social Security for private employees, and the universal coverage scheme, introduced in 2002, which is available to all other Thai nationals.[3] Some private hospitals are participants in the programs, but most are financed by patient self-payment and private insurance. According to the World Bank, under Thailand’s health schemes, 99.5 percent of the population have health protection coverage.[4]

no copays, no deductibles. government run program, including government paying for employees at public hospitals.


(in comparison, the US at the moment has 92% of americans covered by some form of healthcare (up from 86% pre ACA).



and what americans are experiencing when they go to Thailand for healthcare may be part of Medical Tourism.

also very popular are India, Singapore and believe it or not Canada.
 
I wonder if a Dermatology residency is even necessary if your end goal is to do cash pay cosmetic surgery? The proliferation of medspas makes me think it’s a formality. The path of least resistance would be family medicine followed by some aesthetics courses. Botox, fillers, micro needling/RF in the face….laser if you’re feeling sassy. I’ve seen some pretty nasty laser burns on patients who had inexperienced aestheticians. And now GLP weight loss drugs. In the future everyone will be beautiful and their insides will be rotten.
 
I wonder if a Dermatology residency is even necessary if your end goal is to do cash pay cosmetic surgery? The proliferation of medspas makes me think it’s a formality. The path of least resistance would be family medicine followed by some aesthetics courses. Botox, fillers, micro needling/RF in the face….laser if you’re feeling sassy. I’ve seen some pretty nasty laser burns on patients who had inexperienced aestheticians. And now GLP weight loss drugs. In the future everyone will be beautiful and their insides will be rotten.
If that’s the end goal, why wouldn’t you get an online Noctorate, no residency, and be Dr. (first name) doing this?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I think it continues to be true that although there is variation between specialties in pay, there is actually a lot of variation WITHIN specialties for pay. My home town was recruiting me hard during medical school wanting me to pursue FM. Small rural area and the starting pay was much more inline with specialty pay. Not a desirable location, but depending on your situation I think you can do well in most any specialty.
 
I wonder if a Dermatology residency is even necessary if your end goal is to do cash pay cosmetic surgery? The proliferation of medspas makes me think it’s a formality. The path of least resistance would be family medicine followed by some aesthetics courses. Botox, fillers, micro needling/RF in the face….laser if you’re feeling sassy. I’ve seen some pretty nasty laser burns on patients who had inexperienced aestheticians. And now GLP weight loss drugs. In the future everyone will be beautiful and their insides will be rotten.

Has anyone heard of a dermatologist’s aesthetics practice failing? They seem to have an edge over doctors from other specialities. In a world where even RNs are doing aesthetics, it must help as a dermatologist to have a trusting base of insurance patients with skin problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Derm, optho, ortho, rads, GI, gen cards all make significantly more per hour- the caveat is the training takes longer and some (like cards) have minimal control over their schedule. For me personally, performing a specific task of a specialist is/would be much less draining than practicing primary care. Primary care is a sweet gig for those who want it, for those who don't it sounds like pulling teeth (can say this about any field you're not interested in)
You might be surprised by that. I just did the math, I make right around $300/hour. Might be a little under, but not by much if so.

You've also pointed out that many of them have worse hours, less control over schedules, actual call, and longer (often significantly so) training. An FP friend of mine calls FM the ultimate lifestyle specialty, and there's more than a grain of truth in that.

None of this is to say that if you don't like primary care you should do it. Money should never by the primary motivator for choosing a specialty. My goal is to make it known that if you like primary care you can make a pretty darn good living doing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Help us understand what has changed? Are you and your FP friend employed by a hospital network?

Primary care didn’t pay that well 20 years ago when I finished medical school.

With reimbursements in the toilet, I don’t understand how one makes $$ in primary care unless they do concierge medicine or they are employed by a hospital system.

If it is hospital system employment, then it means these PCPs now make so much more money than in the past….due to their referrals to overpriced hospital labs, overpriced MRIs, both of which cost double the price of non hospital tests. 130% charges on clinic visits, and referrals to specialists only within hospital network who also extract similar $$$ from insurance companies for hospital priced service which dramatically drives up insurance costs for regular people, you know, your patients.
Don't hate the player, hate the game. There's a single PP FP group in my town that's still going strong. Every single patient is required (upon pain of dismissal) to get a yearly physical with whatever tests the doctor wants. Yearly chest x-rays, ECGs, sometimes stress tests, and a larger panel of labs than anyone else in the area orders. Conveniently, that office does all of that inhouse. They also don't take Medicare for $ome rea$on.

So you'll forgive me if I don't think working for the hospital is always the greater evil.

That aside, most of primary care's gains in the last several years have come from increasing emphasis by payers on quality metrics. Around 1/3rd of my income this year and last comes from quality metrics. Last year CMS also increased reimbursement for primary care pretty significantly. Its why most of the rest of y'all likely saw cuts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I wonder if a Dermatology residency is even necessary if your end goal is to do cash pay cosmetic surgery? The proliferation of medspas makes me think it’s a formality. The path of least resistance would be family medicine followed by some aesthetics courses. Botox, fillers, micro needling/RF in the face….laser if you’re feeling sassy. I’ve seen some pretty nasty laser burns on patients who had inexperienced aestheticians. And now GLP weight loss drugs. In the future everyone will be beautiful and their insides will be rotten.

Most derms who make bank don’t do it with cosmetics. They do it with good old medical dermatology and they see a ton of patients per day. You can’t see that many patients per day with cosmetics and these types of patients tend to be time sinks since they tend to be more demanding and entitled. Poor ROI financially. Oh, and cosmetics is very saturated. Every one is in on it including non-dermatologist MD/DO’s and mid levels. Botox is a loss leader and it’s only offered to lure patients into a cosmetics clinic for more expensive procedures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Don't hate the player, hate the game. There's a single PP FP group in my town that's still going strong. Every single patient is required (upon pain of dismissal) to get a yearly physical with whatever tests the doctor wants. Yearly chest x-rays, ECGs, sometimes stress tests, and a larger panel of labs than anyone else in the area orders. Conveniently, that office does all of that inhouse. They also don't take Medicare for $ome rea$on.

So you'll forgive me if I don't think working for the hospital is always the greater evil.

That aside, most of primary care's gains in the last several years have come from increasing emphasis by payers on quality metrics. Around 1/3rd of my income this year and last comes from quality metrics. Last year CMS also increased reimbursement for primary care pretty significantly. Its why most of the rest of y'all likely saw cuts.

There’s an FM on Reddit who practices in Ohio. Employed but paid based off productivity/RVU’s. He’s convinced his higher ups to allow him to convert pretty much all inbox messages to televisits or office visits. Max problems he deals with per visit is what the code will reimburse for. All other problems are scheduled for another visit. Dude knows his worth and is unwilling to work for free. Grosses ~800k working ~35 hrs/week. No call, no weekends, no nights. The money is there in FM if one is motivated and a smart doc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Ridiculous. One of my (FM) partners broke 400k in his second year out of residency. Would have been faster but he had to start part time, also was fall of 2020...

Also, less effort? I work bankers hours, phone-only call every 6 weeks, never step foot in the hospital, work 8-4:15ish with a 90 minute lunch break, 4.5 days per week. Can take time off with basically zero notice if need be, will be taking 7 weeks off this year, short residency, no fellowship needed, and will easily clear 400k this year. There's not a full time doctor alive who works less than most FPs while making that kind of money.

Do you consider yourself an outlier, or can most FM docs achieve this if they choose to? Is it doable in a mid-sized or large city?
 
Maybe not yet. The place I got my ankle MRI specifically told me they encourage cash payers. $450, 3T machine, American radiologist read. I called about 5 places and the rates were all over the map.

The main stumbling block to cash is the unfair legal and negotiating leverage insurance and Medicare have. That completely corrupts the free market. It's a joke to call our health care system free market.

Even despite all this, it's still breaking through imo.
They encourage cash payers so the money doesn’t sit on their AR for weeks to months like it does when billing insurance, and they don’t utilize overhead (i.e, billing services) to collect and post the reimbursements. I would love for patients to pay cash for all my bread and butter injections. I doubt their entire business model would be based on self-pay as a $450 MRI may be ‘cheap’ to you, but not to a lot of folks out there. I agree with you that medicine has never been a free market in this country.
 
There’s an FM on Reddit who practices in Ohio. Employed but paid based off productivity/RVU’s. He’s convinced his higher ups to allow him to convert pretty much all inbox messages to televisits or office visits. Max problems he deals with per visit is what the code will reimburse for. All other problems are scheduled for another visit. Dude knows his worth and is unwilling to work for free. Grosses ~800k working ~35 hrs/week. No call, no weekends, no nights. The money is there in FM if one is motivated and a smart doc.
He’s collecting $800K or making $800K pretax?
 
Top