SRS Question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Reaganite

Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
711
Reaction score
875

Members don't see this ad.
How do you guys handle SRS planning with closely adjacent lesions...say separated by a few mm? What kind of hot spot are you willing to accept in normal brain tissue in the "bridge" between the lesions?
 

Neuronix

Total nerd
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
20+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
7,619
There shouldn't be any hot spot in the area between them. It's just a question of how much dose falloff you can get between the two lesions. That's technique dependent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

RickyScott

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2017
Messages
4,332
Reaction score
8,143
Obviously it depends on size and distance, but we try not have 50% bridging when lesions are a few cm apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Ray D. Ayshun

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
2,774
Reaction score
4,946
We go with v10 < 10 ml and v12 < 8 ml for single fraction, in this case just considering it a single lesion. If that won't work, then fractionate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

scarbrtj

I Don't Like To Bragg
5+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2015
Messages
3,216
Reaction score
4,922
How do you guys handle SRS planning with closely adjacent lesions...say separated by a few mm? What kind of hot spot are you willing to accept in normal brain tissue in the "bridge" between the lesions?
The situation is kind of like black hole mergers; the closer the two things get, the "hotter"* the intervening space gets. Can't defy the physics in either situation. You make it be as good as it can is the cop-out answer. The highest dose(s) in the plan should still be the centers of targets... not out in the invisible bridges between (keeping in mind what a "hot spot" truly is). Inverse optimization allowing heterogeneity (ie Dmax's that are up to 50% hotter than the Rx dose, aka Rx'ing up to the ~67% line) plus a single isocenter approach are your friends, if they're not already. Another help is to use beams that are in a plane, or close to a plane, that is perpendicular to a plane that holds the isocenters of the two targets; only applies in two target problems cases really though.

* I know there aren't "heat maps" in the video
 
Last edited:

evilbooyaa

Full Member
Staff member
Volunteer Staff
10+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
8,104
Reaction score
9,522
Try to avoid 50% bridging. If they are really close (like within 2-3mm of each other) then we just contour it all as one PTV, and focus on V12 constraint. Consider IMRT planning as it won't be a nice clean circle rather than DCA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Neuronix

Total nerd
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
20+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
7,619
In addition to what's all been reasonably suggested, depending on size and risk some people would come back and treat the other one at a later date to give the normal brain in between some time to repair.

I try not to let V12s touch in general. But if the total area is small I let it go. GK has the tightest fall-off followed by cone based linac, especially if you favor the cone or shot edges to try to separate the two lesions.

Greater than 8 cc with 18 Gy prescription dose is when I'd strongly consider fractionating the entire volume.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top