The logistical nonsense is largely imposed by our members of our own profession (the AOA and osteopathic state medical boards) in order to promote their agenda at your expense.
A number of us have the same complaints. I myself will be honest, back in my day, whenever I was applying for medical school, I didn't really care if I did DO or MD, I just wanted to be a damn doctor, but if I knew how many damn hoops I had to jump through in the DO world, I might have thought different.
Its a shame and it doesn't work out well for specialist. There is an abundance of FP and IM osteopathic programs but heaven forbid if you want to be a specialist. First off, seems like if you want to be a specialist, the bulk of the programs are offered at some hospital in the armpit of Detroit and not many places otherwise. Heaven forbid you do not match into one of the five specialty programs offered on the DO side of the house (versus the hundereds of FP programs), if you do an MD program for the purposes of geography or availability, you are treated like a "traitor" by the AOA.
On my end, I did an allopathic program for the military. I was actually lucky because much to my surprise, if you say "military" to the AOA, its like carte blanche for getting past all of the BS.
Okay, so I got my complaints off my chest. I think it all comes down to this. We are the future of the AOA. Let us not be as close minded as our current leaders and I would recommend getting involved so that when the time comes, we make the decisions for the better, not the worst.