It seems like a lot of the details in some of our class notes (i.e Neuro & Histo) are unnecessary for a strong clinical foundation or preparation for step I.
Does it make sense to base studying primarily on the best Step I review books for a particular subject (BRS, RR, etc)?
i.e would it be better to read BRS 2-3 times, and the class notes once even though I will miss some of the details? I rather read high-yield material more than low-yield material... but I don't want to feel screwed for having a shallow depth of learning.
Also: my school only has P & F for the first two years. The top 10-15% get AOA after third year and this is heavily based on third year performance.
Comments and experiences are appreciated.
Does it make sense to base studying primarily on the best Step I review books for a particular subject (BRS, RR, etc)?
i.e would it be better to read BRS 2-3 times, and the class notes once even though I will miss some of the details? I rather read high-yield material more than low-yield material... but I don't want to feel screwed for having a shallow depth of learning.
Also: my school only has P & F for the first two years. The top 10-15% get AOA after third year and this is heavily based on third year performance.
Comments and experiences are appreciated.