- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited:
I interviewed at about 12 programs & terminated another 6 interviews after matching where I wanted. My impression is:
1st tier:
Stroke+ Tele+ Intervention (neurologists) group:
U Cincinnati, UCLA, UT-Houston, U Miami, UPMC, MGH, Case Western
Stroke + epidemiology group
Columbia, UT Houston, U Miami, UCSF, Mayo
2nd tier:
Stroke + TCDs +Tele
MCG, Barrow Institute, UT-South Western
Stroke volume-all work & no play
SUNY-Buffalo (800-1000 pa. 2 fellowship positions but usually fill up just 1 place- loads of experience.......& exhaution)
Stroke + intervention for Muslims only
U Minnesota (Qureshi group), UMDNJ Newark (Kirmani group)
Some home truths about Stroke Fellowship training:
CCF doesnt have Tony Furlan anymore. He moved to Case in 2008.
Ralph Sacco moved to U Miami in 2007 from Columbia.
It is a professional hazard to go to the Muslim programs if you want to train in stroke & go on to Intervention. Non-muslims may be booted out after their stroke fellowship. This has been told to me by members of their own faculty & if you dont believe it, go through their fellows names when you interview there, better still go ahead & join the programs.
Certain programs are averse to training neurologists in Intervention, some despite having trained neurologists in the past ie SUNY Buffalo, Barrow, UCLA
please need reply asap! is a fellowship contract binding? can a program force you to go there eventhough you have told them you want to resign (this is for 2009-2010)? Isnt 11 months enough for them to fill the spot?
md2bny.... do you mind if I ask what program you are considering dropping? The ONLY reason I ask is because I am just started looking for fellowships in the last week (yes, I know it's late) to start in July 2009.
It may be nice to know that they could have a candidate slot in if you are trying to leave.
For all those who called me a xenophobe & then took that posting off the website please see this link & tell me if there is a bias in selecting candidates to this institute. I also have evidence of selection bias against other institutes named here.
http://www.umdnj.edu/cbvweb/Faculty___Staff/faculty___staff.html
For all those who called me a xenophobe & then took that posting off the website please see this link & tell me if there is a bias in selecting candidates to this institute. I also have evidence of selection bias against other institutes named here.
http://www.umdnj.edu/cbvweb/Faculty___Staff/faculty___staff.html
Whatever Mr Zarbazan says, it is an estabilished fact that certain programs are practicing racism in their selection policies. This is well acknowledged in the neurovascular field. The link proves it itself. Infact one PD was asked to leave a program for hiring too many Pakistani & Arab muslim fellows to this program & has now got a new program in the Mid-West where he continues the same practices. A list of the fellows recruited to these programs over the last few years will prove this just like the link does. Of course, there is the one odd White American fellow every other year to balance the look of the fellowship. There are 3 such programs in the US right now, 2 in the Mid-West & 1 in NJ. Of course, the US grads dont see this or understand the concept since these practices are rare & done under covers in this country. Everything is done under wraps. In fact, some of the medical students in the link are now going to one of the other programs to become Fellows in endovascular neurology. That proves it in itself. Let these people shriek at the top of their voice that they recruit the best, but the truth is proven by whom they recruit.....Muslims (FMGs or AMGs). Why dont they or their defenders put up a list of their fellows since they took over their programs????? And how come so many Muslims get recruited to these programs where the PD is a Muslim regardless of whether they are US citizens or IMGs in a country where 80% of fellows training in neurocritical care & stroke are White Christians? Statistics dont lie. These questions need answers, otherwise the recruitment policy/interviews & their claims that they are training the best are a big farce. I will leave it to that.The post was not taken away by it's author, but by the administrator. Spreading false rumors about your colleagues will get you in serious trouble in your career as a neurointerventionalist. It is a small world and you are accusing some serious people of selecting fellows based upon their religion yet your pathetic claims are completely unsubstantiated. I am not going to argue this again as there was, is, and will be only one kind of ESN fellows at UMN and UMDNJ - the best ones. Some of them are muslims, many are not (including current ones). I feel sorry for you and your future colleagues...No more posts on my end to this regard.
The post was not taken away by it's author, but by the administrator. Spreading false rumors about your colleagues will get you in serious trouble in your career as a neurointerventionalist. It is a small world and you are accusing some serious people of selecting fellows based upon their religion yet your pathetic claims are completely unsubstantiated. I am not going to argue this again as there was, is, and will be only one kind of ESN fellows at UMN and UMDNJ - the best ones. Some of them are muslims, many are not (including current ones). I feel sorry for you and your future colleagues...No more posts on my end to this regard.