- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
How are sub-I's, particularly those in internal medicine, evaluated by attendings and residents? Or, more fundamentally, what exactly are sub-Is supposed to be doing?
I started my medicine sub-I a few days ago, and I seem to occupy an awkward gap between the intern and MS3 on my team. I know marginally more than the MS3 and far less than the intern. In fact, I often feel as clueless as I was during my 3rd year. I find myself flipping furiously through Pocket Medicine on the wards while being expected to write orders, make sure they're actually carried out, call consults (I know a lot of people do these as 3rd years, but for some reason I rarely had to), and most stressful yet empowering of all, answer pages! By the time I get home, I'm so tired that I usually don't get to read very much on my patients.
For MS3s, learning takes precedence over work on the wards (at least in theory). But as a sub-I, is my main role to improve my fund of knowledge, or is it to gain experience in working more independently and "prove" to the attending and residents that I would make a good intern? Although doing both would be ideal, which matters more as far as evals and LORs go, eagerness to learn (by reading and asking lots of questions) or ability to get the job done efficiently?
By the way, I feel uncomfortable asking questions on rounds as an MS4 because they might be thought of as things I should have learned during 3rd year... Thoughts?
I started my medicine sub-I a few days ago, and I seem to occupy an awkward gap between the intern and MS3 on my team. I know marginally more than the MS3 and far less than the intern. In fact, I often feel as clueless as I was during my 3rd year. I find myself flipping furiously through Pocket Medicine on the wards while being expected to write orders, make sure they're actually carried out, call consults (I know a lot of people do these as 3rd years, but for some reason I rarely had to), and most stressful yet empowering of all, answer pages! By the time I get home, I'm so tired that I usually don't get to read very much on my patients.
For MS3s, learning takes precedence over work on the wards (at least in theory). But as a sub-I, is my main role to improve my fund of knowledge, or is it to gain experience in working more independently and "prove" to the attending and residents that I would make a good intern? Although doing both would be ideal, which matters more as far as evals and LORs go, eagerness to learn (by reading and asking lots of questions) or ability to get the job done efficiently?
By the way, I feel uncomfortable asking questions on rounds as an MS4 because they might be thought of as things I should have learned during 3rd year... Thoughts?