- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Messages
- 4,832
- Reaction score
- 14,382
Last edited:
Not according to any Attending in private practice I've talked with.
I feel like Winged Scapula's input would help here.
It matters in private practice radiology. One group I know of has 18 partners, 18 were chief residents, 16 were AOA, and all of them were from top 15 programs in radiology (WashU, Wake, UCSF, etc).
Of course you do, because you're a pre-med and everything as a pre-med is based on becoming better than other pre-meds and getting into the absolute best program possible. I understand. Once you get into medical school you will realize that people don't really care about prestige, with two key exceptions: those in Academic Medicine, and those who went to prestigious institutions (because they want to think that makes them special).
Data based on one group. N=1. That proves it. 🙄
and we won't get into the debate of whether some of the places you list (Wake) are even top 15 programs in that specialty.
Radiology is rapidly becoming dominated by academic center affiliations and multistate mega-corporations, not 18 partner shops, so it's hard to say if the place you picked is representative of a place many would deem a better private practice gig, versus one that is simply waiting to be wiped out by a big chain. Sort of like mom and pop stores competing with Walmart in that field these days.
In radiology most hires are based on where and with whom you did fellowship and in what subspecialty (over 90% in rads do fellowship these days), so I assure you your med school AOA isn't going to make a difference.
What non-n=1 data have you posted?
Data based on one group. N=1. That proves it. 🙄
and we won't get into the debate of whether some of the places you list (Wake) are even top 15 programs in that specialty.
Radiology is rapidly becoming dominated by academic center affiliations and multistate mega-corporations, not 18 partner shops, so it's hard to say if the place you picked is representative of a place many would deem a better private practice gig, versus one that is simply waiting to be wiped out by a big chain. Sort of like mom and pop stores competing with Walmart in that field these days.
In radiology most hires are based on where and with whom you did fellowship and in what subspecialty (over 90% in rads do fellowship these days), so I assure you your med school AOA isn't going to make a difference.
I've said and am saying this whole kind of anecdotal data is garbage evidence. so it would be hypocritical for me to combat that n=1 with another n of my own.
In radonc most don't do fellowships.