I'm planning to take a year off to do some research, and I was wondering whether basic science or clinical (ophthalmology-related) research experience would be favored by residency programs. Can anyone share their thoughts? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Taking a Year Off for Research - Basic Science vs. Clinical Research
Started by Monkeymaniac
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I'm planning to take a year off to do some research, and I was wondering whether basic science or clinical (ophthalmology-related) research experience would be favored by residency programs. Can anyone share their thoughts? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Def do clinical. Bench research is slower, less productive. You'll likely get many projects done if you do clinical work; probably 1, 2 max with bench.
Generally speaking its # of Publications that is "favored".
As REsseDoc said, you are more likely to get pubs in Clinical research (non-bench clinical research).
Still, if the basic scienctist PI is a star, and you think you can work like a star, there might be more reward to the basic scientist (especially if his work is translational or clinically relevant). My 2 pence.
As REsseDoc said, you are more likely to get pubs in Clinical research (non-bench clinical research).
Still, if the basic scienctist PI is a star, and you think you can work like a star, there might be more reward to the basic scientist (especially if his work is translational or clinically relevant). My 2 pence.
Basic science labs are more likely to tag you on multiple pubs than individual clinicians performing clinical chart review-style research. I think the quality of the research is also important. I would be more impressed by a single pub in a top-5 ophtho journal than a bunch of case reports.
Question on the topic. I am also taking a year off to do research due to the fact that I am not a stellar student and I felt it would help my chances of matching. I was wondering how residency directors view that decision (does it actually help my application or will people be questioning me about why I decided to take the year for research).
The other question is I want to do benchwork and I was debating on whether to do it with an MD/PhD or a PhD; is there a difference?
The other question is I want to do benchwork and I was debating on whether to do it with an MD/PhD or a PhD; is there a difference?
Question on the topic. I am also taking a year off to do research due to the fact that I am not a stellar student and I felt it would help my chances of matching. I was wondering how residency directors view that decision (does it actually help my application or will people be questioning me about why I decided to take the year for research).
The other question is I want to do benchwork and I was debating on whether to do it with an MD/PhD or a PhD; is there a difference?
If you were going to definitely do bench research, I would stay stick to someone who is doing very clinically relevant research in ophthalmology.
To the OP, I personally prefer to read about clinical research than basic science research on someone's application (it makes it easier for me to talk to them about it), but no matter which one you choose, make sure to work really hard and produce quality work.