- Joined
- Dec 22, 2018
- Messages
- 583
- Reaction score
- 1,615
Over the last few years, I've noticed a widespread and pervasive trend of surgeons refusing to let us place epidurals for gnarly abdominal cases (including stem-to-stern ex-laps), and instead either asking for TAP vs rectus sheath blocks/catheters - or more often, "placing their own TAP block". There are 1 or 2 surgeons who do this laparoscopically and actually are probably doing real plane blocks, but the vast majority seem to be basically doing field blocks where most of the local anesthetic ends up in the sub-Q or muscle.
The stated reasons for refusing to allow their patients to have an epidural vary... Most commonly they will cite concerns regarding postop hypotension (which is bogus with the dilute mix we use, but that's a whole different discussion). I'm convinced that a real driver of this trend is the fact that our surgeons don't want to have their case start delayed at all- we're an academic institution with slow turnovers to begin with, residents doing our epidurals, and so it does delay the case start a bit. Having followed a fair number of these patients on the floor, they usually do OK; but they almost always need some narcotic (often a considerable amount vs a PCA), and just because we're getting away with doing this doesn't mean that we're really doing the optimal thing for the patient. The real kicker, which makes me see red, is that the surgeons insist that their TAP blocks are just as good as an epidural, and continue to call these cases ERAS.
I'm curious, how often are others encountering this? Any strategies for dealing with this? I feel like all I can do at the end of the day is make my strong recommendation as a consultant known, and if the surgeon chooses not to follow that recommendation, then I provide the anesthetic- or lack thereof- that they request. Even so, it's frustrating: I don't tell them how to do the surgery, but they apparently feel qualified to dictate the anesthetic.
The stated reasons for refusing to allow their patients to have an epidural vary... Most commonly they will cite concerns regarding postop hypotension (which is bogus with the dilute mix we use, but that's a whole different discussion). I'm convinced that a real driver of this trend is the fact that our surgeons don't want to have their case start delayed at all- we're an academic institution with slow turnovers to begin with, residents doing our epidurals, and so it does delay the case start a bit. Having followed a fair number of these patients on the floor, they usually do OK; but they almost always need some narcotic (often a considerable amount vs a PCA), and just because we're getting away with doing this doesn't mean that we're really doing the optimal thing for the patient. The real kicker, which makes me see red, is that the surgeons insist that their TAP blocks are just as good as an epidural, and continue to call these cases ERAS.
I'm curious, how often are others encountering this? Any strategies for dealing with this? I feel like all I can do at the end of the day is make my strong recommendation as a consultant known, and if the surgeon chooses not to follow that recommendation, then I provide the anesthetic- or lack thereof- that they request. Even so, it's frustrating: I don't tell them how to do the surgery, but they apparently feel qualified to dictate the anesthetic.