Last edited:
Unless it says "I beat cancer", people will make silent judgments and won't bother to know the back story.
So, I am a recently treated cancer patient as well as an MS2-3 (finished with Step 1 but haven't started rotations). My chemotherapy left me with some unwelcome reminders on my left upper arm & shoulder region in the form of skin discolorations (streaks, blotches, etc.). This sort of skin discoloration, as per literature and other peoples experiences, may or may not resolve on its own but after a year or so you'll pretty much know which group you fall under. I figure in 2 years if it doesn't resolve on it's own, I may reclaim that space of my body as my own by getting a tattoo over my left shoulder and upper arm (like a half-sleeve) with a personalized design that relates specifically to my cultural background (no flaming skulls or anything).
I recognize that tattoos in medicine are generally frowned upon, but given my circumstances I'm wondering if mine would be perceived as acceptable (especially when one learns the back story). For what it's worth, I'm a student in good standing with a solid Step 1 score and I'm most interested in EM and Trauma Surgery. Not to sound self serving, but I'm a pretty personable person and tend to interview well. Also I wouldn't be getting this tattoo (assuming I still want it) until AFTER matching residency (because a half sleeve tat requires multiple sessions and I'd work with a reputable artist and would much rather go through this process when I fewer professional obligations on my plate so that I can be sure it's done correctly and tastefully).
Let me know your thoughts
This could be you OP
I'm not giving an opinion when i ask this but...are there no skin-colored tattoos or cosmetic work that can minimize the discoloration?Interesting perspectives and experiences. Thanks for sharing! Good thing I have a couple years to mull over this decision..
I'm not giving an opinion when i ask this but...are there no skin-colored tattoos or cosmetic work that can minimize the discoloration?
I think having tattoos should be against the law, and those who do should be thrown in jail for suspicious drug activity.So, I am a recently treated cancer patient as well as an MS2-3 (finished with Step 1 but haven't started rotations). My chemotherapy left me with some unwelcome reminders on my left upper arm & shoulder region in the form of skin discolorations (streaks, blotches, etc.). This sort of skin discoloration, as per literature and other peoples experiences, may or may not resolve on its own but after a year or so you'll pretty much know which group you fall under. I figure in 2 years if it doesn't resolve on it's own, I may reclaim that space of my body as my own by getting a tattoo over my left shoulder and upper arm (like a half-sleeve) with a personalized design that relates specifically to my cultural background (no flaming skulls or anything).
I recognize that tattoos in medicine are generally frowned upon, but given my circumstances I'm wondering if mine would be perceived as acceptable (especially when one learns the back story). For what it's worth, I'm a student in good standing with a solid Step 1 score and I'm most interested in EM and Trauma Surgery. Not to sound self serving, but I'm a pretty personable person and tend to interview well. Also I wouldn't be getting this tattoo (assuming I still want it) until AFTER matching residency (because a half sleeve tat requires multiple sessions and I'd work with a reputable artist and would much rather go through this process when I fewer professional obligations on my plate so that I can be sure it's done correctly and tastefully).
Let me know your thoughts
I think having tattoos should be against the law, and those whho do should be thrown in jail for suspicious drug activity.
Sooo you're a bigot or a troll. Take your pick.
Sooo you're a bigot or a troll. Take your pick.
There is actually. They have para-medical tattooing where they can camouflage that sort of stuff very easily. Certainly a very good option but I'd have to see someone who specializes at that to verify I'm a candidate. I probably am though since my chemo basically just caused dermal hyperpigmentation so the epidermis is completely fine. It's amazing how para-medical tattooing can make port wine stains and even the redness of 3rd degree burns almost vanish. It's really a shame dermatologists and plastic surgeons are very very very reluctant to support that field (with a few exceptions). I guess maybe they feel like they are the masters of the skin and that if they can't make it right, nobody else can...
If this is accurate, someone should tell all the women looking for miracles with their post-baby stretch-marks? Anyway, I am clueless about how the medical world looks on this but it seems if patients can't see it then it really shouldn't matter. Either way, I'm a fan of the skin neutral option.
Here's a video about this sorta thing
I think having tattoos should be against the law, and those whho do should be thrown in jail for suspicious drug activity.
Here's a video about this sorta thing
Here's what I'll say - people will judge you regardless. The people that judge aren't going to change. Some might judge you for having a tattoo, but it's become so common that I fail to see the reason one should be judged or treated any differently. The only times I find fault in tattoos are when someone gets something "just to get it" or "to fit in". I've seen so many outstanding tattoos on people that I fail to see how you can look at something like that and think "God, what a dirt-poor, Hep-B ridden, mindless, *****". People have their reasons for them and I actually enjoy hearing about it.
And times are changing, people. The old-school docs who believe in old school aren't staying forever and neither will their opinion. So, if you want to get one, get it. I'd applaud you for it. Especially for your reasons. If someone questions/judges you, then I'd encourage you to say why you did it so they can feel like an ignorant douche. Just.... don't get a tribal tattoo.
Hmmm I wonder how well this would work on vitiligo
Most plastic surgeons have medical tattoo artists they work with already - say for post mastectomy nipple/areolar tattooing. However despite the psychological benefit, it's cosmetic and therefore not covered.That kind of blows my mind. Nice! Thanks for the education.
Derm and Plastics should so contract these people or...do something. I guess that would need to be cleared by these stodgy medical boards?
Yet insurance plans will cover sex reassignment surgery, at least in New York, due to psych repercussions of not doing so. Go figure - but for breast CA patients, post mastectomy? No way.Most plastic surgeons have medical tattoo artists they work with already - say for post mastectomy nipple/areolar tattooing. However despite the psychological benefit, it's cosmetic and therefore not covered.
i would get a tattoo, but you wouldn't put a bumper sticker on a Ferrari would you?
Most plastic surgeons have medical tattoo artists they work with already - say for post mastectomy nipple/areolar tattooing. However despite the psychological benefit, it's cosmetic and therefore not covered.
We're not talking about the implants. My comment was about the medical tattoo artist for the re-creation of the nipple areolar complex. The implants are covered under the Women's Health Act of 1998; the tattooing is not always a covered benefit, depends on the policy. Sometimes the issue is that the artist don't take insurance so even if you have coverage you end up paying out of pocket and trying to recoup monies from your carrier.
It's your car; do what you want
*it's for the gumball rally
Wait... what? That's... I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just baffled because I've heard/been told that breast implants are covered for mastectomy and all. So, I'm confused how this wouldn't be covered.
That is not always the case; many plans either restrict or deny coverage for gender reassignment.Yet insurance plans will cover sex reassignment surgery, at least in New York, due to psych repercussions of not doing so. Go figure - but for breast CA patients, post mastectomy? No way.
It's your car; do what you want
*it's for the gumball rally
Wait... what? That's... I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just baffled because I've heard/been told that breast implants are covered for mastectomy and all. So, I'm confused how this wouldn't be covered.
As much as I screw around on here, I feel like I learn tons! SDN is a proper classroom.That is not always the case; many plans either restrict or deny coverage for gender reassignment.
Those plans that are restricted put significant limitations on the coverage. Furthermore, at the very least, Toby Meltzer M.D., a renowned local gender reassignment surgeon does not take insurance. So if you want the cream of the crop surgeon, you may end up paying out-of-pocket for it anyway, regardless of what your plan covers.
The women's health and cancer rights act of 1998 has some restrictions too and insurance companies always look for loopholes. In general I don't have too much trouble with them paying for it although they will balk at procedures for symmetry and of course the nipple areolar reconstruction. http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/whcra.html
It IS your body isn't it (although I'm not sure getting one to be a "badass" is the best idea)?I think it would be badass to get a tattoo. I would get some on my pectoralis major or my deltoids, area where they could be easily covered by scrubs.
Unfortunately, I approached the topic obliquely with my parents (I pointed out a tattooed guy on the street and asked what they thought of his tattoos). They reacted surprisingly violently, and started raging about how they think that "only weirdos and insecure people get tattoos."
Well, there goes that idea. I was surprised with how angry they got, but I guess some patients will react that angrily too. Better not to make it an issue I guess.
I think it would be badass to get a tattoo. I would get some on my pectoralis major or my deltoids, area where they could be easily covered by scrubs.
Unfortunately, I approached the topic obliquely with my parents (I pointed out a tattooed guy on the street and asked what they thought of his tattoos). They reacted surprisingly violently, and started raging about how they think that "only weirdos and insecure people get tattoos."
Well, there goes that idea. I was surprised with how angry they got, but I guess some patients will react that angrily too. Better not to make it an issue I guess.
It IS your body isn't it (although I'm not sure getting one to be a "badass" is the best idea)?
You always do what your parents tell you to do? Keep doing that, women think that's hot.
Oh, I plan to get (non-visible on scrubs) tattoos when I'm an attending, parental approval or not. But when I'm financially (and otherwise) dependent on them, I'd rather keep my head down.
And lots don't...so there's that!Fair enough. And a lot of girls do like tats. So there's that. Just don't get something stupid.
Fair enough. And a lot of girls do like tats. So there's that. Just don't get something stupid.
I have a weakness for girls with tats and piercings. ..
Why hasn't anyone figured out how to make tattoos with like a 6 month commitment? Derm people? What are you busy doing with yourselves?