Taxanomy old vs new

[Electrons]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Are we responsible for the new Taxa scheme rearrangement?

I was going over new Campbell book and noticed it has new scheme. The new one have 3 Domains before 6 Kingdoms...and clades and stuff...are we suppose to know these new stuff?

They also rearranged the Protozoa crap with new words.

 

[doc3232]

bump, this confused me...ADA says the 5 kingdoms which would be Monera, Protista, etc...

Someone answer this please

 

[Electrons]

bump, this confused me...ADA says the 5 kingdoms which would be Monera, Protista, etc...

Someone answer this please

Well, if ADA said 5, I'm stick with the old book and ignore the new stuff. Wiki already updated with the new stuff. Probably next year, they'll test the new stuff.

 

[yakuza]

Stupid zoologists and they're new namings..

 

[dentworld]

It's easy actually. look at the "summary" of this page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_(biology)

hope this clarifies a little. Everything is the same. Just the classification is different. For example, eubacteria and archaebacteria make up monera kingdom (in 5 kingdom system), while they're two different domains. The third domain Eukarya includes everythings else.

 

[Electrons]

Yea, the top are easy. In new Campell book, they added new stuff in almost every kingdom and rearrange some out of past disputes.

 

[Contach]

Yea, the top are easy. In new Campell book, they added new stuff in almost every kingdom and rearrange some out of past disputes.

****k there's a new campbell book? dammmmit i wanted to sell mine!