TBR, Gchem, Electrochem. Passage 6 #35

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Sammy1024

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
701
Reaction score
59
35. Because the CV(aq) anion is NOT oxidized by the Ag+(aq) cation, it can be safely assumed that the reduction potential of Cl2(g) is which of the following?

A . Less than -0.80 volts
B. Between -0.80 and 0.0 volts
C . Between 0.0 and 0.80 volts
D . Greater than 0.80 volts

(Ag+ is a reducing agent with the listed value being 0.80 V).

Can someone explain this to me? I'm okayish at Electrochemistry but I don't really understand how to go about doing the problem/understand the explaination.

Choice D is correct. According to Table 1, the reduction potential for silver cation is 0.80 volts. This means that because chloride anion is not oxidized to Cl2 by silver cation, the oxidation potential of CI- to Cl2(g) must less than (more negative than) -0.80 volts. Reversing this reaction means that the reduction potential of Cl2(g) to CI- must be greater than +0.80 volts. This makes choice D the best answer. You should have been instinctively inclined to zero in on either choice A or choice D without knowing anything about the numerical values, because they are the extreme answers that exclude the other choices.

40. Which of the following reactions would produce the LOWEST (or most negative) voltage?

Since the metal cations are reduced by chlorine gas in each case, we can simplify this question. Because chlorine is oxidized in each answer choice, the question of which reaction generates the lowest voltage is really a question of which cation has the lowest reduction potential. The lowest reduction potential, according to the data in Table 1, is found with Ag+. This makes choice A the best answer.


How do you get to the conclusion that lowest voltage is really a question of lowest reduction potential?

Members don't see this ad.
 
35. Because the CV(aq) anion is NOT oxidized by the Ag+(aq) cation, it can be safely assumed that the reduction potential of Cl2(g) is which of the following?

A . Less than -0.80 volts
B. Between -0.80 and 0.0 volts
C . Between 0.0 and 0.80 volts
D . Greater than 0.80 volts

(Ag+ is a reducing agent with the listed value being 0.80 V).

Can someone explain this to me? I'm okayish at Electrochemistry but I don't really understand how to go about doing the problem/understand the explaination.

Choice D is correct. According to Table 1, the reduction potential for silver cation is 0.80 volts. This means that because chloride anion is not oxidized to Cl2 by silver cation, the oxidation potential of CI- to Cl2(g) must less than (more negative than) -0.80 volts. Reversing this reaction means that the reduction potential of Cl2(g) to CI- must be greater than +0.80 volts. This makes choice D the best answer. You should have been instinctively inclined to zero in on either choice A or choice D without knowing anything about the numerical values, because they are the extreme answers that exclude the other choices.

40. Which of the following reactions would produce the LOWEST (or most negative) voltage?

Since the metal cations are reduced by chlorine gas in each case, we can simplify this question. Because chlorine is oxidized in each answer choice, the question of which reaction generates the lowest voltage is really a question of which cation has the lowest reduction potential. The lowest reduction potential, according to the data in Table 1, is found with Ag+. This makes choice A the best answer.


How do you get to the conclusion that lowest voltage is really a question of lowest reduction potential?

35) Easier to look at the reduction potential half reation. If Cl- were to be oxidized by the Ag+ cation then Ag+ would have to be reduced to Ag solid with a reduction potential of 0.80 volts. Therefore, the reduction potential of Cl2+ 2e- --> 2Cl- would have to be less than 0.80 V (if it were to be oxidized). but they're saying it's not oxidized therefore the reduction half potential of Cl2 + 2e--> 2Cl-would have to be greater than .8 V ( same thing as saying the oxidation potential of Cl- to Cl2 would have to be more negative than -.8 V)

40) When multiplying balanced equations of EMF voltages coefficients don't matter. Chlorine- is being oxidized to Cl2 in all 3 cases. Therefore, Eoxidation + E reduction simply becomes Ereduction b/c Eoxidation is constant for A B and C. It doesn't matter if the E oxidation for chlorine is positive or negative, E reduction is the lowest with .8V. If you don't believe this pick a positive and negative case for 2Cl- --> Cl2 + 2e-

Ag+ wins both times as the lowest voltage (I just picked 10V to make the numbers easier, it would work of course for any other value)

10V +.8=10.8
10V+1.2=11.2
10V+1.5=11.5

-10+.8=-9.2V
-10+1.2-8.8V
-10+1.5=-8.5V
 
Top