- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
this is another example of how TBR CBTs have flawed questions.
"Based on the pedigree shown in Figure 1, what is the probability that the oldest sib is a heterozygote for the PKU trait?"
it gives you 2 generations of a tree for PKU. PKU it says is an autosomal recessive disease. the parents are unaffected, and the 4 siblings are the following:
from left to right with X being they have PKU.
0 X X O
it says the siblings are left to right oldest to youngest. so the individual we are dealing with is the unaffected one on the very left.
since the parents are unaffected and half their kids have PKU, then both parents are heterozygous (Pp x Pp). so each child has 25% PP, 50% Pp, 25% pp. i chose 1/2 and got it wrong. it says the answer is 2/3 because you know it doesn't have the "pp" since the oldest sib is not recessive.
that question is poorly worded. you can try to claim "well the mcat is tricky and you have to watch out," but guess what, the real mcat isn't that lame. the question should say they only want you to take into account it being unaffected. i know the pedigree says it is unaffected, but the question doesn't tell you to neglect the 25% chance that it could have been recessive.
i don't know. this question is crappy. TBR is full of bad questions like this, not to mention bad typos that mess up given equations.
"Based on the pedigree shown in Figure 1, what is the probability that the oldest sib is a heterozygote for the PKU trait?"
it gives you 2 generations of a tree for PKU. PKU it says is an autosomal recessive disease. the parents are unaffected, and the 4 siblings are the following:
from left to right with X being they have PKU.
0 X X O
it says the siblings are left to right oldest to youngest. so the individual we are dealing with is the unaffected one on the very left.
since the parents are unaffected and half their kids have PKU, then both parents are heterozygous (Pp x Pp). so each child has 25% PP, 50% Pp, 25% pp. i chose 1/2 and got it wrong. it says the answer is 2/3 because you know it doesn't have the "pp" since the oldest sib is not recessive.
that question is poorly worded. you can try to claim "well the mcat is tricky and you have to watch out," but guess what, the real mcat isn't that lame. the question should say they only want you to take into account it being unaffected. i know the pedigree says it is unaffected, but the question doesn't tell you to neglect the 25% chance that it could have been recessive.
i don't know. this question is crappy. TBR is full of bad questions like this, not to mention bad typos that mess up given equations.
Last edited: