- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Messages
- 129
- Reaction score
- 0
After my experience of taking the August MCAT, I realized that some of the information on the exam wasnt in the review books. I went through the review books several times before the test and then I looked through them again after the test to confirm if the material on the test was in fact in the review books or not. It turned out that there was some information that i had seen on the test that was new to me and i didnt find them in the review books. The review books i am referring to is the examkrackers 5th edition review books.
So is it worth going through textbooks to study or not? I realized after taking the test that the most important tool you need to take the test is not your content(which of course is very important) but rather your critical thinking ability in relation to your content background. This may seem to most of you as an obvious statement and it was obvious to me also before taking the test. However after taking the test that obvious statement wasnt a reality in my preperation. I relied heavily on my content background and panicked when i saw new information that i had not come across in my studying.
So the question stands: should i prepare with my textbooks in conjunction with the review books??
So is it worth going through textbooks to study or not? I realized after taking the test that the most important tool you need to take the test is not your content(which of course is very important) but rather your critical thinking ability in relation to your content background. This may seem to most of you as an obvious statement and it was obvious to me also before taking the test. However after taking the test that obvious statement wasnt a reality in my preperation. I relied heavily on my content background and panicked when i saw new information that i had not come across in my studying.
So the question stands: should i prepare with my textbooks in conjunction with the review books??