The MSAR is seriously a good use of 20 something dollars (or for those receiving FAP, good use of $0).
The MSAR is seriously a good use of 20 something dollars (or for those receiving FAP, good use of $0).
Just a few years ago they stated that the published data used the most recent MCAT (per phone call) for an individual's score. It will be interesting to see if the answer has changed (if you can get a response from someone who really knows the answer).AAMC doesn't indicate which of multiple MCAT's it counts as the individual's "MCAT" score.
They recommend an average. I'll ask if that is what they use!
Interesting that schools with higher LizzyM scores tend to have lower levels of Clinical and non-clinical volunteering but higher levels of research.
It's alive!
I think they should just give us their excel files with all of the raw data.
Edit: I accidentally a word.
Unsure that's true since hofstra has been known to poach with generous aid.Va Tech and Hofstra have stats at or > the national avg. No more "new school" for these two.
Darn hofstra and their mcat median of 33! Ooc why do you think despite being relatively new (their first class just matched), hofstras numbers are so high? Geographic location can't be the only factor! Perhaps that and the LI bagels 😛Va Tech and Hofstra have stats at or > the national avg. No more "new school" for these two.
Darn hofstra and their mcat median of 33! Ooc why do you think despite being relatively new (their first class just matched), hofstras numbers are so high? Geographic location can't be the only factor! Perhaps that and the LI bagels 😛
Lots of smart Jews on Long Island.
You don't buy a particular edition. You buy a one-year subscription that will update to the new version as it becomes available. I would wait until at least June of the year before you'll apply to buy it, so that it will still be active when you're finalizing your school list.I'm not applying till 2016. Would you all recommend getting this year's edition? I will absolutely buy the 2017 MSAR regardless.
Many schools now have a 37 (98th percentile) MCAT median, but there are still only two with a 38 median: Wash U and Penn. Interesting how Harvard, Stanford, & Yale still can't break the 99th percentile for their matriculating classes.
I'm sure their answer would be "We could if we wanted to".
Here's a start:I've been looking through but failed to see any new schools, are they on there? And if so, what are they?
My feeling is that Stanford (and Harvard too) tend to go for those applicants who have that special "something" (e.g., a special EC) instead of just super high stats.
Do you know which three schools that stopped accepting internationals? I hope they are the ones that says they accept but never do.No OOS applicants matriculated to UCR or UCD.
Rutgers still only matriculated 1 OOS.
RWJ is all the way up to 5 OOS.
Only 62 schools are accepting international applicants (down from 65).
AZ continues to matriculate a considerable number of OOS applicants.
That's all the top programs...
It's no secret that there is some significant leadership change all the way down to Associate Dean level as well.Only interesting thing I'm observing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sexton#President_of_New_York_University
This guy was responsible for making NYU good, with some house of cards-style tactics perhaps but still...anyway after some votes of no confidence he's basically being fired in 2016. They went from 140 million of NIH funding in 2010 to 245 million in 2014, which is insane.
I am REALLY curious as to how this impacts NYU's stratospheric ascent. Wasn't it like #35 5 years ago?
I wonder what @gyngyn thinks will happen. Very few people 5 years ago would have said NYU would be ranked higher than cornell/sinai. Will they coast? Will they plummet? Will they manage to keep the momentum?
Only interesting thing I'm observing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sexton#President_of_New_York_University
This guy was responsible for making NYU good, with some house of cards-style tactics perhaps but still...anyway after some votes of no confidence he's basically being fired in 2016. They went from 140 million of NIH funding in 2010 to 245 million in 2014, which is insane.
I am REALLY curious as to how this impacts NYU's stratospheric ascent. Wasn't it like #35 5 years ago?
I wonder what @gyngyn thinks will happen. Very few people 5 years ago would have said NYU would be ranked higher than cornell/sinai. Will they coast? Will they plummet? Will they manage to keep the momentum?
Those were all on the 2015 MSAR though, were they not? I'm looking for schools who are accepting their first round of applicants this for the 2016 start date.Here's a start:
Florida International University College of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, and Commonwealth Medical College in Pennsylvania, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of MedicineHofstra University School of Medicine,Central Michigan University School of Medicine and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville; University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine; Western Michigan University.
Dell? If you are from TX.Those were all on the 2015 MSAR though, were they not? I'm looking for schools who are accepting their first round of applicants this for the 2016 start date.
Stanford over accepted the previous year (now they have a new admissions dean).Most interesting things I've found so far besides what was already listed:
UCLA median MCAT went from 35 to 34, while UCI stays at 34 and UCSD stays at 35. Unbelievable, UCLA has a lower median MCAT than SD!
University of Colorado went from 29.75% (47) out of state matriculation to 35% (64) 17 more students!
Dartmouth went down to a 33 from a 34, opposite of my expectation.
Stanford had 12 less matriculants from 102 to 90 and went from 61 instate matriculating students to 48, 13 less in state!
University of Miami went from 93 (46.97%) matriculating out of state students to 113 (56.78%), while the class size stayed roughly the same!
I wonder what the co-relation of matriculants to accepted student is... would love to get my hands on some of that data.
Hard to say...Also what exactly does a new admissions director mean for 15-16 applicants, as in how will things change for us?
Many schools now have a 37 (98th percentile) MCAT median, but there are still only two with a 38 median: Wash U and Penn. Interesting how Harvard, Stanford, & Yale still can't break the 99th percentile for their matriculating classes.
I'm sure their answer would be "We could if we wanted to".
On the acceptance information tab you get matriculant data.I'm pretty sure the MSAR just gives info about the accepted students, not the matriculated class
You've got that backwards.I'm pretty sure the MSAR just gives info about the accepted students, not the matriculated class
harvard got easier to get into. 10th percentile GPA went from 3.73 -> 3.72
after a certain point (36 or 37), the scores are all basically the same
They can't update the scores yet, because the first round of MCAT 2015 test takers doesn't matriculate into schools for another 6 months.Dang I hate that they did not update the scores to the new scoring system. I really want to know what score I should get on the MCAT to get in to a particular school.