Creating this for people who want to discuss The Economist articles if they're having problems with VR and just understanding author's tone/main point in general.
I read this article: Bobby Jindal, Trying to lead the party of growth
http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21576099-likely-contender-next-republican-nomination-setting-out-his-stall-trying
From what i got, the author thinks although he is successful, interesting, had potential to run for the next Republican president, his chances are slim now because he is moving too fast with his reforms and moving too fast in general? So really, the author doesn't believe he will be able to even make it for the run in 2016?
Please correct me, i am trying to understand more politics in general. And if you have any other comments on the author's tone or the article itself, let me know.
I read this article: Bobby Jindal, Trying to lead the party of growth
http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21576099-likely-contender-next-republican-nomination-setting-out-his-stall-trying
From what i got, the author thinks although he is successful, interesting, had potential to run for the next Republican president, his chances are slim now because he is moving too fast with his reforms and moving too fast in general? So really, the author doesn't believe he will be able to even make it for the run in 2016?
Please correct me, i am trying to understand more politics in general. And if you have any other comments on the author's tone or the article itself, let me know.
