- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 182
- Reaction score
- 1
<---- looks furtively around for mod . . .
I suppose this could go on forever, as long as we don't offer medical advice.
That is actually somewhat convincing. However, I'd like to know the scope of their review (i.e., every study that has been done at Penn, only Dental studies, etc.), and whether the retrospective studies were validated (I know, I know, that was their whole point, but the review doesn't say whether they bothered to check this out).
Yes and no. Unfortunately, there are so many rules and regulations surrounding adoption at this point that "would love" has almost nothing to do with it. Try adopting with a bankruptcy on your record. Or a criminal conviction. Try adopting as a single parent. Or as a gay couple. (Yes, I went there.) Or a combination of factors. I remember re-reading Anne of Green Gables and thinking "wow, they're sending for a kid like I'd send out for pizza."
I assume "change of life" refers to menopause? Maybe it was her tonsils that were preventing pregnancy. Or, with a slightly more scientific approach, maybe she did have (a) low-grade infection(s), and these were enough to throw off her systemic homeostasis to the point where her body couldn't support the fetal implantation in the uterine lining? In that case, it wouldn't be the antibiotics that interfered with her birth control, but rather the biotics already extant.
Have there been any systematic studies of infertility that focus on *cause* instead of solution? I'm asking in genuine curiosity, not to tweak anybody.
And finally . . . just because I feel like lecturing (must be the overbearing, arrogant male in me ), remember that we're entering a relatively small community. I know that some folks will always butt heads almost on first meeting (my favorite study parter is a pre-med whom nobody else can seem to get along with). Just in the NYC area, I know vets who won't speak to each other at conferences, or who are so radically opposed to another's practice philosophy that they run them down constantly. With that said, I wonder if everyone here is aware that there are very good odds that we will all interact on a professional or semi-professional level at some point in our careers (unless you graduate, move to the bayou, or the sticks, or wherever your preferred hole-in-the-wall is, and never emerge again and never do any CE and never update your knowledge but I know that nobody here would ever do that) . . . and the things said on message boards exist forever. To provide a non-medical example, there's an entire portion of the LGBT community that *still* (six years later) will not watch/read/discuss anything that Joss Whedon has done post Season Six of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, because he had the nerve to kill off a lesbian character. And the vitriol they spilled on message boards six years ago is still cited in discussions about the issues, and is still ruining friendships.
Ok, off my soapbox, return to your poo-slinging, I'll keep the parvosol handy.
HEY!! Anyone want to comment on the AIG bonus returns?
I suppose this could go on forever, as long as we don't offer medical advice.
BayleeVet2B said:My mom is in the "human" medical field and actually the "antibiotic/birth control interaction" has not been scientifically proven to be true! Just my two cents worth in what is a VERY interesting conversation!!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12436822
That is actually somewhat convincing. However, I'd like to know the scope of their review (i.e., every study that has been done at Penn, only Dental studies, etc.), and whether the retrospective studies were validated (I know, I know, that was their whole point, but the review doesn't say whether they bothered to check this out).
flyhi said:Seriously, anyone ever heard of ADOPTION?? What's all this bull about paying for abortions v. raising a child?? Gimme a friggin break. There are a ton of wonderful couples who would love to have your child and.......pay for everything...what a concept.
Yes and no. Unfortunately, there are so many rules and regulations surrounding adoption at this point that "would love" has almost nothing to do with it. Try adopting with a bankruptcy on your record. Or a criminal conviction. Try adopting as a single parent. Or as a gay couple. (Yes, I went there.) Or a combination of factors. I remember re-reading Anne of Green Gables and thinking "wow, they're sending for a kid like I'd send out for pizza."
sumstorm said:On a different angle, my husband's mother didn't have him till she was 48. She thought she had already started the change of life. They had tried to have children and had accepted that they just weren't able. Then she had her tonsils removed due to recurring infections. One month later she was pregnant...they assume that the antibiotics cleared up a low grade infection.
I assume "change of life" refers to menopause? Maybe it was her tonsils that were preventing pregnancy. Or, with a slightly more scientific approach, maybe she did have (a) low-grade infection(s), and these were enough to throw off her systemic homeostasis to the point where her body couldn't support the fetal implantation in the uterine lining? In that case, it wouldn't be the antibiotics that interfered with her birth control, but rather the biotics already extant.
Have there been any systematic studies of infertility that focus on *cause* instead of solution? I'm asking in genuine curiosity, not to tweak anybody.
And finally . . . just because I feel like lecturing (must be the overbearing, arrogant male in me ), remember that we're entering a relatively small community. I know that some folks will always butt heads almost on first meeting (my favorite study parter is a pre-med whom nobody else can seem to get along with). Just in the NYC area, I know vets who won't speak to each other at conferences, or who are so radically opposed to another's practice philosophy that they run them down constantly. With that said, I wonder if everyone here is aware that there are very good odds that we will all interact on a professional or semi-professional level at some point in our careers (unless you graduate, move to the bayou, or the sticks, or wherever your preferred hole-in-the-wall is, and never emerge again and never do any CE and never update your knowledge but I know that nobody here would ever do that) . . . and the things said on message boards exist forever. To provide a non-medical example, there's an entire portion of the LGBT community that *still* (six years later) will not watch/read/discuss anything that Joss Whedon has done post Season Six of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, because he had the nerve to kill off a lesbian character. And the vitriol they spilled on message boards six years ago is still cited in discussions about the issues, and is still ruining friendships.
Ok, off my soapbox, return to your poo-slinging, I'll keep the parvosol handy.
HEY!! Anyone want to comment on the AIG bonus returns?