The good, the bad and the ugly. My perspective.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ExperiencedDPM

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2015
Messages
954
Reaction score
1,624
Here's my take on the good, the bad and the ugly in the podiatric profession.

GOOD:

-We've got some great docs doing great work

-There are improved scopes of privileges compared with years ago

-Residency training is a mandatory 3 years, so there is some consistency though training varies

-There is an increasing presence of DPMs in ortho groups, hospitals and specialty groups

-Many young docs are starting with respectable salaries

-Hard work and honesty can result in a much better than average income.

BAD:

-There's not a lot of "uniqueness". Many things we do are duplicated by other professions

-NPs and PAs are now performing palliative care, wound care and treating common pathology

-Schools have a decreased applicant pool

-Decreased applicant pool results in poor quality students being accepted

-There is a major disparity in the training among residency programs

-There is minimal valuable original research within the profession

-APMA dues are ridiculous

-APMA needs to focus on important issues and not issues such as their Seal of Acceptance program

-Every time I see a newspaper clip about a DPM it involves the doc talking about the perils of flip flops

-Every time I see a DPM being interviewed on TV, it's about what shoes or socks to buy

-Low pass rates on the ABFAS certification exam

-Too many bogus certifying boards

-Practice management groups who are more concerned with money that patient outcomes

The UGLY:

-DPMs promoting screws that are DESIGNED to be removed in a few weeks (so they can bill for removal) and scaring the public with fears of "metallosis".

-DPMs using $20,000 worth of hardware for simple cases

-DPMs performing an arthroreisis and having the balls to bill for a subtalar joint arthroDESIS or billing for an open reduction with internal fixation of a talo tarsal dislocation.

-DPMs who advertise miracle cures of fungal nails with lasers

-DPMs having to use elaborate systems and fixation systems that cost thousands of dollars when performing a Lapidus

-DPMs who "sell" custom orthoses for every ailment when OTC will work as well.

-Crap residency programs (NY is a huge culprit) where the residents learn nothing and the residency directors use the residents and clinic for personal use and gain, while teaching them nothing of value and performing unbelievable amounts of unnecessary surgery on uneducated and vulnerable welfare patients.

-There is a "pediatric foot and ankle society" that claims to be the premier expert on pediatric foot pathology. However the current president
doesn't even perform pediatric surgery. The "premier" group? Is that why no pediatric hospital in the world has ever heard of one of these self proclaimed experts?

-There is a practice management group that preaches that they can make you more money. How ironic that the former or it may be the present president of the organization filed bankruptcy.

-There is a "balance brace" that is hawked to prevent falls in the elderly, even though there is no valid literature to support it's use. It's sold because Medicare pays thousands for the brace. Ironic that no valid literature about fall prevention ever mentions this brace. Ironic that no physiatrist, rehab doc, therapist or neurologist ever uses this brace. Ironic that Medicare does not pay for fall prevention braces, so even though it's hawked as a fall prevention brace the doctor has to fabricate a different diagnosis to get paid.

I can go on and on, but these are just a few of the thoughts that popped into my head. I'm sure my colleagues can add to this list.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the post, really appreciate the insight.

From your perspective, do you think that there will be a streamlining of certifications required in the future? Just having 1 board and being done?
 
Thank you for the post, really appreciate the insight.

From your perspective, do you think that there will be a streamlining of certifications required in the future? Just having 1 board and being done?

No.

There is really only one board that is significant in my opinion. The ABFAS.

New boards and new board sub-sections will keep popping up and our colleagues are stupid enough to buy into this crap.

These docs want more meaningless initials after their names. The boards are not stupid, they know that no matter what crap they make up, people will bite AND pay. It’s a money maker and it’s not going away any time soon.

Although we don’t need any more boards or sub specialty certifications, it’s only going to get worse.
 
Which programs in NY are you referring to?

Sorry, not going down that road. Anyone with any neurons firing in their brains can figure this out within minutes of visiting the programs.

I can tell you that Lombardi is legit and anything he’s involved with is the real deal. You may not like him or his style but he’s 100% legit.
 
Thanks for the insight
I just finished my first semester of Podiatry school
and thought it would be nice to visit some programs during my break
I intend to stay in NY, if you could nudge me in the right direction for good programs that would be nice!
 
Come on, this sounds legit....
 

Attachments

  • imagejpeg_0.jpg
    imagejpeg_0.jpg
    204.4 KB · Views: 228
Thanks for the insight
I just finished my first semester of Podiatry school
and thought it would be nice to visit some programs during my break
I intend to stay in NY, if you could nudge me in the right direction for good programs that would be nice!

If you want to be nudged in the right direction, look for programs outside of NY.
 
If I could add. Put it any category you like, probably ugly: The majority of referring doctors view podiatry as a toenail doctor. Everyone denies that this affects them, but the top codes billed are 11721, 11719. Most podiatry money is made on cutting toenails and a large amount of surgery revenue generated started with a toenail referral. You are misguided if you think you will only do surgery. That is a minority of DPMs. Its not as though you choose what you want to do. You graduate with a few hundred K in debt and the jobs available will determine what you do and once you start a low or non surgical pathway, the window of maintaining your surgical training and obtaining board certification closes. Grades and residency are not always enough to propel you out of this dilemma. Good people get pushed aside. This is why we have so many DPMs selling laser treatments, topical tolnaftate toenail miracles and the like.
Perception is reality and podiatry has only slightly cracked the mold of being a toenail doctor in the eyes of the public and referring medical peers. Having a separate degree with separate non MD/DO training is a barrier for most people.
For the above reasons DPMs generally do better in lower income and lower education areas where there is less consideration of ones degree and being called doctor is good enough.
I don't need the anecdotes as to where I am "completely wrong". If you are going to refute the above, please post broad or regional statistics. I would love to be wrong.
 
View attachment 226906
Sponsored ad on Facebook...

Don’t get me started on this COMPLETE BS. It never hurts being born into one of the biggest practices in the country. Did he ever have concerns about getting into school? Did he ever have concerns regarding how he was going to pay for college or podiatry school? Did he ever have concerns about obtaining a residency? Did he ever have any concerns regarding competing for a job? Did he ever have any concerns about negotiating a contract with the boss? Did he ever have any concerns that the boss would screw him (or his wife who is a DPM in the practice). The list can go on forever.

I have a colleague who was foolish enough to spend money to take the FABI course (no, it wasn’t me!). This is the take away he told me he “learned”.

1). Open up a store as part of your office to sell ALL kinds of sh-t. Yeah, you know the story. They try to rationalize by telling you it’s easier and more convenient for the patient, blah, blah, blah.

2). They tell you how to aggressively bill to maximize reimbursement. (They don’t talk about that actually quality of the surgical outcomes)

3). They tell you to invest in bells and whistles technology. ESWT, EPAt and all other devices used to make money that they’ve done “studies” on (they also got in trouble for some of those but that’s another story).

4) they convince you to use ultrasound. So I really need US to tell me a patient had plantar fasciitis? Really?

5). They tell you that you need to use ultrasound guided injections for PF, neuromas, etc. So you can make more money doing something unnecessary. Sorry, but if you really need ultrasound to perform a PF injection or neuroma injection you really shouldn’t have a license.

6). Consider a CT scanner or MRI for your office. Sure, we all have that kind of cash laying around to perform more unnecessary tests.

7). They tell you that you can be honored to visit and tour their office for a few hundred bucks. Yes you read that correctly. A colleague charging you for the privilege of touring their office. I wonder if they include lunch?

I get emails from FABI and it’s like used car sales. Every week the price gets cheaper. Then there’s an informercial with Jr talking from the family compound in Mexico, overlooking the water telling us how important it is to have down time. Sure, none of have to worry about taking time off and zipping down to our family compound.

Sorry, but this rates below sleaze in my books.

My original title of this thread was the good, the bad and the ugly. We can now add the VERY ugly. Nauseating.
 
Don't forget about using modifiers within the global period for "strapping" of the bunion or hammertoe. Sorry, if you are relying on the way you wrap it to maintain correction then you picked the wrong procedure or didn't do it right in the OR. When I heard they bill for that on a lot of post ops I nearly spit my nice single malt Islay scotch out.
 
Don't forget about using modifiers within the global period for "strapping" of the bunion or hammertoe. Sorry, if you are relying on the way you wrap it to maintain correction then you picked the wrong procedure or didn't do it right in the OR. When I heard they bill for that on a lot of post ops I nearly spit my nice single malt Islay scotch out.

Agreed. What they don’t tell you is that using a modifier doesn’t simply “erase” the post op rules or give you carte blanche to be creative. There are rules for a reason and CCI edits. The use of a modifier such as “59” doesn’t simply erase those edits. There must be a rational and legitimate explanation.

59 is an abused modifier that people think simply cancels out any CCI edit.

The list of shady things they recommend is staggering.

Made me spill my bottle of Night Train.
 
Lol....I think this tells you who reads PM news/Podiatry Management online etc....suppose this was in ACFAS - greater than 5%?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    42.1 KB · Views: 147
Top