Which one is more indicative of being a good physician?

  • Grades and MCAT scores

    Votes: 21 77.8%
  • Extracurriculars and life experience

    Votes: 6 22.2%

  • Total voters
    27

Dumpy

1,000,000+ Posts
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Apr 22, 2004
49
0
A cave.
Status
OK, let's have at it. I've ruffled some feathers, now let's see public opinion. Which is more important when determining who will be a better physician?
 

Dumpy

1,000,000+ Posts
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Apr 22, 2004
49
0
A cave.
Status
Fumoffu said:
Kind of funny how on an anonymous poll, grades and mcats seem to be winning...
What do you know? People are actually contradicting themselves? On this forum? Nooo.

Just to let all of you know, I have received a plethora of PM's congratulating me and agreeing with my post. So, take a better look at the ass-kissing pre-med next to you... they are secretly plotting to destroy you!
 
About the Ads

Squat n Squeeze

Membership Revoked
Removed
15+ Year Member
May 22, 2003
594
3
Visit site
Status
Fumoffu said:
Kind of funny how on an anonymous poll, grades and mcats seem to be winning...
:thumbup: :thumbup:
 

UseUrHeadFred

Oh no! It's a Wumpus!
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 10, 2004
935
2
Columbia, MO
Status
I think MCAT scores and GPA predict whether or not you CAN become a doctor. I think extracurriculars and life experience probably correlate with being a so-called "better doctor". Once you're in med school, all bets are off. Kiss those scores GOODBYE.

Now, a poll that included the USMLE steps would be interesting...
 

Dr. N

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Apr 21, 2004
174
0
Status
Dumpy said:
OK, let's have at it. I've ruffled some feathers, now let's see public opinion. Which is more important when determining who will be a better physician?

I think everythink together: GPA, MCAT and experience. Don't you think so?
 

Dumpy

1,000,000+ Posts
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Apr 22, 2004
49
0
A cave.
Status
Squat n Squeeze said:
SquatnSqueeze... what can I say. You're the reason I got into the trolling business. Its an honor.

:smuggrin:
 

Fumoffu

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Mar 25, 2004
194
0
Visit site
Status
Dumpy said:
What do you know? People are actually contradicting themselves? On this forum? Nooo.

Just to let all of you know, I have received a plethora of PM's congratulating me and agreeing with my post. So, take a better look at the ass-kissing pre-med next to you... they are secretly plotting to destroy you!
I arm myself with a sack full of pennies before I walk in any science related class.

I think a lot of people actually agree with you but don't have the balls to say it outloud because they're afraid that all the other "PC supporters" are going to bash them. When deep down everyone is thinking the SAME thing, just afraid that the social norm or whatever is going to result in a public stoning.
 

Dumpy

1,000,000+ Posts
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Apr 22, 2004
49
0
A cave.
Status
Well folks, this poll is rapidly reaching statistical significance. Looks like all of you warm-fuzziers out there are screwed. You're entering a profession where, like anything that works, competition and results are what matters. Take your hippie bull$hit elsewhere.
 

E.A. Poe

the man
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Mar 18, 2004
111
0
Visit site
Status
The bottom line is that you have to be able to read between the lines with some people. I myself had a 3.3 GPA with my first year: 0.9 (try swimming with that cement block attached to your feet). My overall GPA statistic merely makes me underated and has absolutely no bearing on my ability, motivation, or intelligence. First year was 10 years ago so you simply cannot make a blanket statement gauging "bad" medical students from stats. It doesn't always work. Give me a Harvard matriculant and I'll wager I stack up favorably. IMO non-research extracurriculars should count as 5-10% of someone's overall admissions ranking; you've got to have some.
 

Dumpy

1,000,000+ Posts
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Apr 22, 2004
49
0
A cave.
Status
E.A. Poe said:
IMO non-research extracurriculars should count as 5-10% of someone's overall admissions ranking; you've got to have some.
Why? What, besides the bull$hit that you spewed/plan to spew to admissions committees, did you take from non-research EC's. They are a hurdle you jump through. A painless one, sure , but still nothing more than a hurdle. I spent mine stuffing envelopes and filing stuff. Personally, without the experience of stuffing envelopes, I don't think I could have accurately described to my interviewer why I wanted to be a doctor. How could I?
 

Ryo-Ohki

7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 29, 2002
3,575
1
Visit site
Status
"life experience", "complete applicant", "well-rounded" are obfuscating terms usually used to conceal a goal that can not be achieved through objective measurements like MCAT/GPA.
 
About the Ads