- Joined
- Oct 14, 2014
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 152
So we can talk about all things MCAT 2015.
Just registered too!
Just registered too!
So I just finished my AAMC full length and here are my percentages:
Chem/Phys- 75%
CARS- 89%
Bio- 73%
Psyc- 88%
And I guess overall that's 81.25%?
Am I in okay shape for getting a good score? I'm not gonna stop studying obviously, but I so want to be in the 90+ percentile.
I would work on bringing up Bio. What were you getting wrong? I think 80% is a marker for a good score, but who really knows right now. The actual exam will be harder. The consensus is that the bio on the actual exam is pretty comparable to the sample test, Chem/physics might be a little easier on the actual exam, CARS is about the same, a little harder with a little bit longer passages, and psych/soc is considerably harder on the actual test. If you can bring up your bio then I would feel more comfortable about it.
How have you been doing on other practice tests?
Thanks for the reply! It was weird that bio was my worst section because it's usually by 2nd best (right under CARS). I think all the research jargon tripped me up. I see you did great in that section, any tips?
I'm taking Kaplan and have been scoring around a 505, which is clearly a bad score, but I don't trust it. You said 80%+ is probably a marker for a good score, but what exactly is a good score?
There are "conversions" to old scale numbers, but the comparison between the two is a moot point. The old test is much much different the resulting scores and percentiles are resultantly much different as well.
No one officially knows where we stand, but to answer your question,
Old - New
---------
03 -- 472
06 -- 476
09 -- 480
12 -- 484
15 -- 488
18 -- 492
21 -- 496
24 -- 500
27 -- 504
30 -- 508
33 -- 512
36 -- 516
39 -- 520
42 -- 524
45 -- 528
For a single section:
Old - New
---------
01 -- 118
02 -- 119
03 -- 120
04 -- 121
05 -- 122
06 -- 123
07 -- 124
08 -- 125 * "Average"
09 -- 126
10 -- 127
11 -- 128
12 -- 129
13 -- 130
14 -- 131
15 -- 132
Don't get yourself down though. The new practice test are really hard, quite unrealistic, and honestly, TPR's projection of what a 503 is based on no actual experience. Their assignment is completely arbitrary. Best method of practice would be to record the percentage of questions you get wrong, mark the areas you need to work on, and study those!
There are "conversions" to old scale numbers, but the comparison between the two is a moot point. The old test is much much different the resulting scores and percentiles are resultantly much different as well.
No one officially knows where we stand, but to answer your question,
Old - New
---------
03 -- 472
06 -- 476
09 -- 480
12 -- 484
15 -- 488
18 -- 492
21 -- 496
24 -- 500
27 -- 504
30 -- 508
33 -- 512
36 -- 516
39 -- 520
42 -- 524
45 -- 528
For a single section:
Old - New
---------
01 -- 118
02 -- 119
03 -- 120
04 -- 121
05 -- 122
06 -- 123
07 -- 124
08 -- 125 * "Average"
09 -- 126
10 -- 127
11 -- 128
12 -- 129
13 -- 130
14 -- 131
15 -- 132
Don't get yourself down though. The new practice test are really hard, quite unrealistic, and honestly, TPR's projection of what a 503 is based on no actual experience. Their assignment is completely arbitrary. Best method of practice would be to record the percentage of questions you get wrong, mark the areas you need to work on, and study those!
I'm not memorizing any specific pathways. (Other than ones I already know from Biochem class) AAMC doesn't seem to test super specific detail. For each pathway I'm devoting to memory the major enzymes, especially the ones with large delta G, and the general purpose of the pathway.Is anyone memorizing certain mechanisms in detail (like the Chymotrypsin Mechanism) for last minute content review? I don't see the Chymotrypsin Mechanism specifically in the aamc outline.. tbr is making me go crazy.
There are "conversions" to old scale numbers, but the comparison between the two is a moot point. The old test is much much different the resulting scores and percentiles are resultantly much different as well.
No one officially knows where we stand, but to answer your question,
Old - New
---------
03 -- 472
06 -- 476
09 -- 480
12 -- 484
15 -- 488
18 -- 492
21 -- 496
24 -- 500
27 -- 504
30 -- 508
33 -- 512
36 -- 516
39 -- 520
42 -- 524
45 -- 528
For a single section:
Old - New
---------
01 -- 118
02 -- 119
03 -- 120
04 -- 121
05 -- 122
06 -- 123
07 -- 124
08 -- 125 * "Average"
09 -- 126
10 -- 127
11 -- 128
12 -- 129
13 -- 130
14 -- 131
15 -- 132
Don't get yourself down though. The new practice test are really hard, quite unrealistic, and honestly, TPR's projection of what a 503 is based on no actual experience. Their assignment is completely arbitrary. Best method of practice would be to record the percentage of questions you get wrong, mark the areas you need to work on, and study those!
They're probably going to look at percentiles in lieu of the MCAT. I imagine they'll put less weight in the MCAT than normally, but probably not by much... I don't think anyone has a clue TBH.So if we can't really equate new scores to old ones, does anyone have any idea how medical schools will be evaluating our scores? Do you think there will be more emphasis on GPA this cycle?
So if we can't really equate new scores to old ones, does anyone have any idea how medical schools will be evaluating our scores? Do you think there will be more emphasis on GPA this cycle?
POE?Does anyone know the difference between cognitive dissonance and drive reduction? For example this problem:
A woman is on a diet but she experienced a moment of weakness and a ate a doughnut. She feels guilty about "breaking" her deit, so she decides to spend an extra 30 minutes at the gym. Her behavior can be attributed to which of the following processes?
A. Cognitive Dissonance
B. Drive Reduction
C. Social Loafing
D. Classical Conditioning
I thought Drive Reduction was an internal discomfort, is feeling guilty not an internal discomfort, why? What is the fine line between these two terms?
Any help would be appreciated, please and thank you.
Does anyone know the difference between cognitive dissonance and drive reduction? For example this problem:
A woman is on a diet but she experienced a moment of weakness and a ate a doughnut. She feels guilty about "breaking" her deit, so she decides to spend an extra 30 minutes at the gym. Her behavior can be attributed to which of the following processes?
A. Cognitive Dissonance
B. Drive Reduction
C. Social Loafing
D. Classical Conditioning
I thought Drive Reduction was an internal discomfort, is feeling guilty not an internal discomfort, why? What is the fine line between these two terms?
Any help would be appreciated, please and thank you.
Took AAMC full length yesterday:
CP - 78%
CARS - 85%
B - 90%
PS - 81%
83% overall
So far completed:
TPR FL 1: 509
CP - 127 80%
CARS - 126 72%
B - 129 85%
PS - 127 74.5%
TPR FL 2: 507
CP - 127 80%
CARS - 124 60.3%
B - 129 88%
PS - 127 73%
AAMC Official Guide:
CP - 80%
CARS - 87%
B - 79%
PS - 67%
AAMC BIO 1: 87%
AAMC BIO 2: 91%
AAMC CHEM: 84%
AAMC PHYSICS: 84%
AAMC CARS 1: 89%
AAMC CARS 2: 80%
Plan for last two weeks:
Address some Biochem memorization, molecules, etc.
Keep reviewing note cards for all chem/physics equations, and amino acids.
Memorize Psych Soc terms, note cards.
Do about 5 passages in each subject (Bio, chem, physics, psych soc) in the TPR Science work books each day. Want to get another 2000 problems completed and reviewed.
3 TPR CARS passages each day, timed. Do 2 passage 10 minute drills every few days.
Take 2 more full lengths.
Have no life.
F**K
The BEST answer would be cognitive dissonance because her actions in eating a donut contradicted her inner beliefs (that donuts are bad) which gave rise to a mental stress or discomfort (feeling guilty). The reason it is not a drive is because the discomfort was merely guilt as a result of her actions, not a result of a biological/basic need. Although you could say the act of eating a donut could be attributed to drive reduction, but cognitive dissonance is clearly the better answer.Does anyone know the difference between cognitive dissonance and drive reduction? For example this problem:
A woman is on a diet but she experienced a moment of weakness and a ate a doughnut. She feels guilty about "breaking" her deit, so she decides to spend an extra 30 minutes at the gym. Her behavior can be attributed to which of the following processes?
A. Cognitive Dissonance
B. Drive Reduction
C. Social Loafing
D. Classical Conditioning
I thought Drive Reduction was an internal discomfort, is feeling guilty not an internal discomfort, why? What is the fine line between these two terms?
Any help would be appreciated, please and thank you.
Hey guys, can someone guide me to the FL AAMC practice exam? I have purchased it, but I can't find it on the website. I plan on taking it either this weekend or next. Probably next, considering I have one more FL ExamKrackers left to take. Thanks!!
Drive reduction theory deals with reducing or eliminating internal tension states, but these tension states are the result of biological needs, not wants.
Thank you guys! It seems I had a loose definition of what a "drive" was, this helped clarify it!The BEST answer would be cognitive dissonance because her actions in eating a donut contradicted her inner beliefs (that donuts are bad) which gave rise to a mental stress or discomfort (feeling guilty). The reason it is not a drive is because the discomfort was merely guilt as a result of her actions, not a result of a biological/basic need. Although you could say the act of eating a donut could be attributed to drive reduction, but cognitive dissonance is clearly the better answer.
Just took the 120 official guide under timed conditions (45 min/section), I didn't do the VR because I've pounded out an hour and forty mins of CARS already... anyways my scores were as follows
Bio: 70%
PS 87%
Psych 84%
I'm quite upset at the Bio score, especially as it has been my highest scoring section lately... however I'm very pleased with the PS score as I've been working hard the last few weeks to increase my Physics and chemistry knowledge.
I took the FL at the beginning of my prep and my Bio score then was a 73%. Not really sure what to make of this
Just got verified!! So weird to think this whole process is actually happening. We all grow up so fast !![]()
Those scores are very good for an EK exam!Took the 2nd EK today. Slight improvement from the first one, but still not where I'd like to be at. Still making some stupid mistakes, along with the occasional gap in content knowledge. Went from 77% overall in the first one (42/59, 40/53, 46/59, 49/59) to 83% overall (46/59, 42/53, 50/59, 53/59). Still so hard to sit and focus for over 6 hours, despite this being the 4th or 5th time I've written a FL exam. Hopefully will improve in the 3rd EK exam, although I seem to recall some people saying the 2nd was easier. How's everyone else doing as we get closer? Anyone else feeling super burnt out? 🙁 I feel like I'm getting to that point, but trying to push through since we're only 2 weeks away!
Thanks! Yeah I'm not super concerned, I don't think its a gap in knowledge because on the two bio packs of 120 questions each I scored 93% for each. When I looked back I made 3 stupid errors that I really shouldn't have, one of which was accidentally selecting the wrong option...needless to say I was relieve and mad at myself. Those kinds of mistakes can't be made on the real thing!I wouldn't sweat it too much. The bio on the official guide seemed more difficult than usual. I'd say to just review the concepts behind the questions you missed and try not to let the actual score stress you out. Regardless though, 70% isn't bad at all! 🙂
Great news! Yeah after that point it gets very surreal. Out of curiosity though, for the people in this thread, it's somewhat of a risk getting verified before even taking the MCAT correct?
Well, other than not having submitted mine because I haven't really worked on my PS, I would NOT submit to the actual schools you want until you get an MCAT or at least preliminary. You can submit to a throw away school to get the verification process started, though.
I think the verification process takes about as long as it takes to get scores, so in theory if you have your ducks in a row and submit right after you take your MCAT it probably won't delay things much, or at all!
I have no doubt you're going to have a top 2%tile MCAT score. You can probably afford to take a week off if you're feeling burnt outTook the 2nd EK today. Slight improvement from the first one, but still not where I'd like to be at. Still making some stupid mistakes, along with the occasional gap in content knowledge. Went from 77% overall in the first one (42/59, 40/53, 46/59, 49/59) to 83% overall (46/59, 42/53, 50/59, 53/59). Still so hard to sit and focus for over 6 hours, despite this being the 4th or 5th time I've written a FL exam. Hopefully will improve in the 3rd EK exam, although I seem to recall some people saying the 2nd was easier. How's everyone else doing as we get closer? Anyone else feeling super burnt out? 🙁 I feel like I'm getting to that point, but trying to push through since we're only 2 weeks away!
Trying to make the curve a little easier are we? 😉I have no doubt you're going to have a top 2%tile MCAT score. You can probably afford to take a week off if you're feeling burnt out
That would be nice but I'm actually serious. Think about it someone who's scoring exceptionally well is not going to lose much if anything in a week. And then there will still be a week left for another FL and some last minute review. It's certainly what I would do if I was in that position (scoring <90% on the AAMC FL and <80% on EK/other TP companies).Trying to make the curve a little easier are we? 😉
That was quick! How do the verify it? Do they call all your references and your colleges attended?Just got verified!! So weird to think this whole process is actually happening. We all grow up so fast !![]()
I was going to help you out but I missed them too!anyone explain number 5,11 on the physical section?
That was quick! How do the verify it? Do they call all your references and your colleges attended?
So can you submit for verification if you only have grades in and not PS and activities?I believe they verify the grades you reported on AMCAS to your transcript
anyone explain number 5,11 on the physical section?
So can you submit for verification if you only have grades in and not PS and activities?
You have to have everything in except for LoR's and Mcat scores.So can you submit for verification if you only have grades in and not PS and activities?