- Joined
- Apr 7, 2010
- Messages
- 560
- Reaction score
- 278
I find it pretty interesting that CRNAs have continuously battled us for independence and have always argued on the premise that they should be the anesthesia provider because they are cheaper and more cost effective option. Now a lot of them would rather take on liability independently because they want to make 300-400k a year. I'm thinking at this point if you want the independence and income of a physician you should've gone to medical school and put in the appropropriate training to be able to do that, especially for the safety of the patient. It's unbelievable to me that groups, hospitals, etc. are allowing CRNAs to get away with independent billing in many states for anesthesia services to make the same as many attendings nationwide. This completely defeats the whole purpose of them even existing in the first place. If they are coming for the same independence and income potential, I don't see what their purpose is anymore. These places might as well have only physicians providing anesthesia if they are planning on letting midlevel providers make 300-400k.