The URM Advantage

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know a single successful black pre-med who wasn't middle-class or higher. Do you?
Well I would definitely say that I know myself. I've only been able to go to college because of the government assistance of the Pell Grant because my family really is poor. In May of 2013 I will graduate from college with honors and apply to medical school; I would consider myself successful and not a member of the middle class.

You're very wrong to assume that the minorities who succeed only come from successful families.
 
Also, the mistrusts of white doctors is way overblown in this thread. I have never encountered this. Actually, I have seen white doctor preferred over other. The mistrust of black doctors by other races, which this policy is the feeding fuel, are far more relevant in my experiences. Also, when i think about it, The arguments that patients wanna be treated by a doctor of their own races is moot. Are you just going to treat people of your race when you become a doctor? If you hope to convey in your application that you are 100% going to be a primary care doc and say yes to my question, all power to you, I hope you get in with urm advantage. This should be the only exception, negating the point that you might change your intention of becoming a pcp completely in the future during medical school.
And 😀 at last paragraph. They taking everything!
lol. I don't think mistrust of white doctors is a good way to put it though. I think it's more like, who are you more likely to be buddies with? Who could you think of as advising you as a friend rather than as a superior? You're right about it being overblown though. My pediatrician was indian and I never thought about it in a negative manner.
 
Well I would definitely say that I know myself. I've only been able to go to college because of the government assistance of the Pell Grant because my family really is poor. In May of 2013 I will graduate from college with honors and apply to medical school; I would consider myself successful and not a member of the middle class.

You're very wrong to assume that the minorities who succeed only come from successful families.
I'm sure there are a number of them. I'm thankful for programs like the Pell grant (I also got that, you don't exactly have to be no toys for christmas broke to get it) that allow people who are intelligent to have access to the programs that they deserve. My experience has been that myself and the other successful black students at my university are not the ghetto ones. I'm not saying they don't exist, I'm saying they are the exception not the rule. All the more reason to feel pride in your accomplishments if you ask me. Most people DON'T do you what did.
 
Sure, but if the SCOTUS repeals AA, it would give the message that AA was wrong in the first place, which is not I think. Like Adrian said; is about level out the playing field.

The lack of access to those "programs" isn't likely gonna help the cause for diversity in schools or encourage more minorities to take on the challenge to step up their game.
We are a product of our environment; we are unique because each of us experience a different environment which continues to define how we interact in the world. Minorities [in general] pursuit higher education at lower rates than other ethnicities/races because different factors have been embedded in their culture. Repealing AA will just make it more difficult for those who have the drive to pursuit higher education, but who might have lower stats because of socioeconomic status, lack of role models, internalized racism, etc (just to mention a few reasons).

It bothers me that many times successful people acquired this individualist mentality of "If I can do it, they can do it also," or "pull yourself by your bootstraps." What this people fail to realize is that their approach to life is different than anyone else; people deals with adversities in different ways, we are a product of our environment, which is unique to each of us.


Once again, Lobo, we are on the same side. I was actually mocking at the people who think banning AA and those kinds of programs will make any big difference in the fact that institutions are within their rights to create admission policies that serve their purposes and missions and not the demands of people who think the deserve to have whatever they want.

I have this to say to those who are not happy with the current situation. Remove the need for those programs. Stop thinking of yourselves as better, smarter and more deserving. Commit to practising medicine in the areas that need physicians regardless of whatever you may meet. Find ways to provide workable solutions to the very real problems that exist in providing healthcare access to poor minority-dominant regions.

NB

We have a responsibility to hold the door of opportunity open for those who might have trouble opening it for themselves but we cannot drag them kicking and screaming through it and on to success.
 
Last edited:
Once again, Lobo, we are on the same side. I was actually mocking at the people who think banning AA and those kinds of programs will make any big difference in the fact that institutions are within their rights to create admission policies that serve their purposes and missions and not the demands of people who think the deserve to have whatever they want.

I have this to say to those who are not happy with the current situation. Remove the need for those programs. Stop thinking of yourselves as better, smarter and more deserving. Commit to practising medicine in the areas that need physicians regardless of whatever you may meet. Find ways to provide workable solutions to the very real problems that exist in providing healthcare access to poor minority-dominant regions.

We have a responsibility to hold the door of opportunity open for those who might have trouble opening it for themselves but we cannot drag them kicking and screaming through it and on to success.

Wow. I do not know how you stay sane reading these threads.
 
I'm sure there are a number of them. I'm thankful for programs like the Pell grant (I also got that, you don't exactly have to be no toys for christmas broke to get it) that allow people who are intelligent to have access to the programs that they deserve. My experience has been that myself and the other successful black students at my university are not the ghetto ones. I'm not saying they don't exist, I'm saying they are the exception not the rule. All the more reason to feel pride in your accomplishments if you ask me. Most people DON'T do you what did.
Up until about 13-14, my parents were legitimately poor. I wouldn't consider myself ghetto but I do have stereotypical black tendencies (listen to loud music, lazy, have tattoos, love chicken [white people really do love chicken as much as black people, may I add]). While I didn't grow up in a well off family, my entire success is because of my mother's amazing ability to stress the importance of education. Sadly, education is not seen as important in many African-American families and communities (I'm sure the same is true for Hispanics as well), and that is because of the society that America implemented towards minorities. When you spend your entire life simply trying to survive, it's hard to focus on your education.
 
Wow. I do not know how you stay sane reading these threads.


I laugh, scratch my head and stare disbelievingly at my computer screen at the immense stupidity I see sometimes, give an occasional fist pump when someone makes a solid point, give the finger to others who don't, bang my head on my desk when I see these kind of threads pop up again and agin becasue I know I will not be able to resist diving into the derp...and when I am sick of it, I log out, close the window, go study to make sure that I have what it takes to achieve the goals I have set for myself, hang out with friends to remind myself that not everyone in this world is totally clueless and selfish, listen to music, go for a run, call my family and remind myself that life goes on.
 
proving that it is unfair to weed out an individual based on race, just as much as it is to shoe in an individual based on race. good for them to do a race-blind system. But yea you're right..its human. I still think it's mainly an American thing. I've spent several months in Brazil and nobody ever even thinks about race differences..


Compare Brazils rich-poor discrepancy, human rights record etc etc with the US's and you will realize that the fact that nobody "ever even thinks about racial differences" does not mean that those differences to not exist and do not keep some down and others up. I bet you a fairer skinned person in Brazil with more caucasian type features does ot face the kind of discrimination and stereotyping that darker skinned people do.

Resigning yourself to a situation is different from not talking about a situation because it nolonger is an issue.
 
Compare Brazils rich-poor discrepancy, human rights record etc etc with the US's and you will realize that the fact that nobody "ever even thinks about racial differences" does not mean that those differences to not exist and do not keep some down and others up. I bet you a fairer skinned person in Brazil with more caucasian type features does ot face the kind of discrimination and stereotyping that darker skinned people do.

Resigning yourself to a situation is different from not talking about a situation because it nolonger is an issue.

but in the situation of med school apps, not talking about race and keeping race blind ensures that everyone has an equal chance. Again, Dr. Ben Carson. African American, from ghetto in detroit, had a good mother, she wouldn't let him make excuses for anything because he was the only person that could influence his life...now, he's one of the best neurosurgeons in the country and he still feels the same way.

P.S, I wasn't referring to the rich-poor aspect of Brazil. Yes, there is a big discrepancy. But with race ( skin color), it is a non-issue.
 
but in the situation of med school apps, not talking about race and keeping race blind ensures that everyone has an equal chance. Again, Dr. Ben Carson. African American, from ghetto in detroit, had a good mother, she wouldn't let him make excuses for anything because he was the only person that could influence his life...now, he's one of the best neurosurgeons in the country and he still feels the same way.

P.S, I wasn't referring to the rich-poor aspect of Brazil. Yes, there is a big discrepancy. But with race ( skin color), it is a non-issue.

Equal Chance??? Wow... Talk about not getting it.

How long did you live in Brazil again? And could you dig into your expert knowledge on Brazils social structure to tell us all how wealth and opportunity is divided in that country? Becasue I have a sneaking suspiciion the populations who historically were of the slave class do not have it as good as those who were of the ruling class.

And I suppose Ben Carson did it all by himself right? There were no programs and policies put in place to ensure that nobody barred him from opportunities becasue he was black. His brilliant mind did it all.
 
Last edited:
I laugh, scratch my head and stare disbelievingly at my computer screen at the immense stupidity I see sometimes, give an occasional fist pump when someone makes a solid point, give the finger to others who don't, bang my head on my desk when I see these kind of threads pop up again and agin becasue I know I will not be able to resist diving into the derp...and when I am sick of it, I log out, close the window, go study to make sure that I have what it takes to achieve the goals I have set for myself, hang out with friends to remind myself that not everyone in this world is totally clueless and selfish, listen to music, go for a run, call my family and remind myself that life goes on.

Just for that, I'll need to buy you a drink. Well done.
 
Equal Chance??? Wow... Talk about not getting it.

How long did you live in Brazil again? And could you dig into your expert knowledge on Brazils social structure to tell us all how wealth and opportunity is divided in that country? Becasue I have a sneaking suspiciion the populations who historically were of the slave class do not have it as good as those who were of the ruling class.

And I suppose Ben Carson did it all by himself right? There were no programs and policies put in place to ensure that nobody barred him from opportunities becasue he was black. His brilliant mind did it all.

I see what you did there. A lot of people believe that their wealth, their resources, and their smarts are enough to achieve their goals and dreams without life interfering. no one is above life, or beyond help for that matter.
 
How UT Chooses Its (not top 10%) students;

Fisher involves the admissions policy for undergraduates at the University of Texas at Austin. To facilitate diversity, Texas adopted a policy of taking the top 10 percent of graduates from high schools across the state. For the time period covered by the litigation, about 70 percent to 80 percent of the undergraduates were admitted via this Top Ten Percent Plan. Texas found, though, that this did not yield the desired diversity. In the fall of 2002, African-Americans comprised only 3.4 percent of the students and Hispanics were only 14.3 percent. This was less than the fall 1996 levels, despite a significant increase in the Hispanic population of Texas during this time period.

After Grutter v. Bollinger, the Regents of the University of Texas adopted a policy to further diversity. This involved a “holistic” review of each application, with race being a small part in the consideration.

Each applicant was assigned a numerical score, and placed on a grid, based on two assessments:

1) an Academic Index (based on grades and test scores)

2) and a Personal Achievement Index. The Personal Achievement Index is a product of the evaluation of two essays and a Personal Achievement Score. Race is one of seven factors used in determining an applicant’s Personal Achievement Score.

Since Fisher just missed the top 10% of her class (82/674) she was evaluated under the "holistic" formula for admission. She also had a 3.6 gpa, scored nearly 1,200 on the SAT, and she was an accomplished cellist. Both LSU and Baylor offered her scholarships.

Should be an interesting case to follow. 👍
 
How UT Chooses Its (not top 10%) students;

Fisher involves the admissions policy for undergraduates at the University of Texas at Austin. To facilitate diversity, Texas adopted a policy of taking the top 10 percent of graduates from high schools across the state. For the time period covered by the litigation, about 70 percent to 80 percent of the undergraduates were admitted via this Top Ten Percent Plan. Texas found, though, that this did not yield the desired diversity. In the fall of 2002, African-Americans comprised only 3.4 percent of the students and Hispanics were only 14.3 percent. This was less than the fall 1996 levels, despite a significant increase in the Hispanic population of Texas during this time period.

After Grutter v. Bollinger, the Regents of the University of Texas adopted a policy to further diversity. This involved a “holistic” review of each application, with race being a small part in the consideration.

Each applicant was assigned a numerical score, and placed on a grid, based on two assessments:

1) an Academic Index (based on grades and test scores)

2) and a Personal Achievement Index. The Personal Achievement Index is a product of the evaluation of two essays and a Personal Achievement Score. Race is one of seven factors used in determining an applicant’s Personal Achievement Score.

Since Fisher just missed the top 10% of her class (82/674) she was evaluated under the "holistic" formula for admission. She also had a 3.6 gpa, scored nearly 1,200 on the SAT, and she was an accomplished cellist. Both LSU and Baylor offered her scholarships.

Should be an interesting case to follow. 👍

So let me see if I have this straight...She has acceptances to attend Baylor and LSU with scholarship offers but she sues UT-Austin for not accepting her....

if this is true this should be an interesting case to follow.
 
So let me see if I have this straight...She has acceptances to attend Baylor and LSU with scholarship offers but she sues UT-Austin for not accepting her....

if this is true this should be an interesting case to follow.

UT is still a better school depending on her choice of major. Also, it is still probably cheaper to go to UT despite the scholarship. (Baylor is private and lsu is oos).
And, it is the overall principle that matters not her own circumstances.
 
So let me see if I have this straight...She has acceptances to attend Baylor and LSU with scholarship offers but she sues UT-Austin for not accepting her....

if this is true this should be an interesting case to follow.

Yup, that's what I've read. She has already graduated from Louisiana State University. Fisher filed the lawsuit asserting that she was rejected because she was white and, not considered on an equal basis with African-American and Hispanic applicants.
 
UT is still a better school depending on her choice of major. Also, it is still probably cheaper to go to UT despite the scholarship. (Baylor is private and lsu is oos).
And, it is the overall principle that matters not her own circumstances.


But then how many black/hispanic/native american students even get the chance to have their choices come down to where it would be cheaper to go?

Remember that AA and its derivatives were designed mainly to give a chance to people who were intentionally barred from opportunity by others because of their race. How is it now that people are getting upset becasue it gives opportunity to those people because of their race? What am i missing here guys?

And let's not forget that Miss Fisher had the opportunity to participate in Texas's race blind selection process but missed it because she was not in the top 10% of her class. Of the 7 factors considered in the holistic approach I wonder why she focused on the race factor alone. They took her spot?

Lets talk about equal chances...why is it that black/hispanic/native american students who get admitted to college and post grad institutions tend to drop out more? Likely because they were not adequately prepared for those kinds of academic environments by the education they received at levels at or below high school. And why were they not adequately prepared ? Likely becasue they were educated in a piss poor school system with none of the resources that that more economically viable whites and asians have access to. And why are they more likely to be educated within such poor conditions in the first place? We could trace this back to Harriet Tubman, Sacagawea and [Insert hispanic historical figure here]. This is not in any way meant to belittle the struggles that Asians have had to face in the US but honestly if you as an Asian immmigrant feel that you have the kinds of issues and face the kinds of challenges that blacks and native americans and hispanics historically and currently face in this country. You need a class in American history and not the Pocahontas version either.

So you want equal opportunity for all? How about investing into programs that ensure that at the very basic level, nomatter what economic situation a child faces at home, he has access to the best possible educational foundation? How about ensuring that by the time it comes to college and post grad institutions, all these students have had access to similar resources and the opportunity to develop whatever potential they have. Then you can say that such and such a person does not deserve to be admitted because they had the same things as we did and did not make the best of it.
 
Last edited:
Equal Chance??? Wow... Talk about not getting it.

How long did you live in Brazil again? And could you dig into your expert knowledge on Brazils social structure to tell us all how wealth and opportunity is divided in that country? Becasue I have a sneaking suspiciion the populations who historically were of the slave class do not have it as good as those who were of the ruling class.

And I suppose Ben Carson did it all by himself right? There were no programs and policies put in place to ensure that nobody barred him from opportunities becasue he was black. His brilliant mind did it all.

are you saying you don't think he achieved it by himself...no, his success was because of the groups who made sure he could study at the right universities and not be discriminated against? Dude, I don't even consider that in the equation..that's not really the point I'm trying to make. Okay, let me make a disclaimer. In a normal, free society, everyone has equal opportunity.

Actually, yes, lol. Carson did achieve what he achieved because of his brilliant mind. Actually, he attributes his great success because of his "normal" brain. He earned the grades. he earned the scholarships, and he earned his spot at Hopkins. Of course when it gets higher up and more specialized, one can use a little luck, but in principle, Carson did it all because he was hungry and realized he could change his environment.

you mad, brah?
tumblr_m1y441Bsbc1r3mtwbo1_400.gif
 
are you saying you don't think he achieved it by himself...no, his success was because of the groups who made sure he could study at the right universities and not be discriminated against? Dude, I don't even consider that in the equation..that's not really the point I'm trying to make. Okay, let me make a disclaimer. In a normal, free society, everyone has equal opportunity.

Actually, yes, lol. Carson did achieve what he achieved because of his brilliant mind. Actually, he attributes his great success because of his "normal" brain. He earned the grades. he earned the scholarships, and he earned his spot at Hopkins. Of course when it gets higher up and more specialized, one can use a little luck, but in principle, Carson did it all because he was hungry and realized he could change his environment.

you mad, brah?
tumblr_m1y441Bsbc1r3mtwbo1_400.gif

Chew on this "brah"

AA was instituted in 1961 when Dr Carson would have been 10 years old. Wanna bet that somewhere along the line he benefited from it in one way or the other seeing as outright legal segregation completely ended in the US in the 70's?


By the way what is the point you are trying to make? Becasue Ben Carson was lucky enough to use his "normal" brain to achieve success, this extends to every single black child in Detriot? The US?
 
But then how many black/hispanic/native american students even get the chance to have their choices come down to where it would be cheaper to go?
They can if they put in the same efforts asian students did. srsly, that is all there is to it, whether a person is willing to put in the effort or not. Actually, there are tons of people of the aforementioned races who get to choose. idk what you are talking about?
Remember that AA and its derivatives were designed mainly to give a chance to people who were intentionally barred from opportunity by others because of their race. How is it now that people are getting upset becasue it gives opportunity to those people because of their race? What am i missing here guys?
Because AA by itself is a flaw concept of reverse discrimination.
And let's not forget that Miss Fisher had the opportunity to participate in Texas's race blind selection process but missed it because she was not in the top 10% of her class. Of the 7 factors considered in the holistic approach I wonder why she focused on the race factor alone. They took her spot?
The top 10% rule is deeply flawed. The rule, desgined to get more Hispanic and Black students, effectively taking away the importance of the SAT so that students in lower income area can attend their top choices of college. This place heavy burden on students at a well-funded public school who had to compete with overachieving peers. Why did she focused on races? well quite simply, when you see another student at the same school with lower class rank and lower SAT score than you get in, and that person is Hispanic/Black while you are outright rejected...what do you think the deciding factor is?
Lets talk about equal chances...why is it that black/hispanic/native american students who get admitted to college and post grad institutions tend to drop out more? Likely because they were not adequately prepared for those kinds of academic environments by the education they received at levels at or below high school. And why were they not adequately prepared ? Likely becasue they were educated in a piss poor school system with none of the resources that that more economically viable whites and asians have access to. And why are they more likely to be educated within such poor conditions in the first place? We could trace this back to Kunta Kinte, Sacagawea and [Insert hispanic historical figure here]. This is not in any way meant to belittle the struggles that Asians have had to face in the US but honestly if you as an Asian immmigrant feel that you have the kinds of issues and face the kinds of challenges that blacks and native americans and hispanics historically and currently face in this country. You need a class in American history and not the Pocahontas version either.
This is just a theory. You might be able to make a case for black and native american oppression causing regression in eucation values. But hispanics immigrants face the same challenges as asian immigrants. other theory include genetic, cultural, personal attributes, values, environment.... ect. I can tell you right now that it all come down to parenting, about how much you want your kids to be successful or not. If you do, then you move out of the piss poor area, work 3 jobs at minimum wage so your kids received adequate schooling. There are all kinds of programs to help you if you want to do so. Oh another thing, what is your background? who are you to say that the challenge asian immigrants faced is nothing compared to other races? you dont get to say that unless you are unequivocally, an asian immigrant.
So you want equal opportunity for all? How about investing into programs that ensure that at the very basic level, nomatter what economic situation a child faces at home, he has access to the best possible educational foundation? How about ensuring that by the time it comes to college and post grad institutions, all these students have had access to similar resources and the opportunity to develop whatever potential they have. Then you can say that such and such a person does not deserve to be admitted because they had the same things as we did and did not make the best of it.
You must live in a perfect world 😀
sound like socialism to me, rich people will always have more resources to develop more potential than poor people. now you can either overcome that unequalities through sheer effort or god-given intelligence or step back and enjoy the show.
bored so i will give a shot
 
Last edited:
What you get out of something depends on what you put in. You can say whatever you want about a lack of educational opportunities or whatever but it depends your motivation. At the very least, you can learn basically anything that interests you from excellent teachers on the internet and the internet is free at the public library. If you don't develop your potential, you only have yourself to blame. Most people don't have the world handed to them, they have to go out and take it. You can point a finger at history or socioeconomic factors but the fact remains that no one can force someone else to learn and that people have to take personal responsibility for their actions.
 
Originally Posted by Freesia88 and Modified by tn4596
But then how many black/hispanic/native american students even get the chance to have their choices come down to where it would be cheaper to go?
1.They can if they put in the same efforts asian students did. srsly, that is all there is to it, whether a person is willing to put in the effort or not.
Remember that AA and its derivatives were designed mainly to give a chance to people who were intentionally barred from opportunity by others because of their race. How is it now that people are getting upset becasue it gives opportunity to those people because of their race? What am i missing here guys?
2. Because AA by itself is a flaw concept of reverse discrimination.
And let's not forget that Miss Fisher had the opportunity to participate in Texas's race blind selection process but missed it because she was not in the top 10% of her class. Of the 7 factors considered in the holistic approach I wonder why she focused on the race factor alone. They took her spot?
3. The top 10% rule is deeply flawed. The rule, desgined to get more Hispanic and Black students, effectively taking away the importance of the SAT so that students in lower income area can attend their top choices of college. This place heavy burden on students at a well-funded public school who had to compete with overachieving peers. Why did she focused on races? well quite simply, when you see another student at the same school with lower class rank and lower SAT score than you get in, and that person is Hispanic/Black while you are outright rejected...what do you think the deciding factor is?
Lets talk about equal chances...why is it that black/hispanic/native american students who get admitted to college and post grad institutions tend to drop out more? Likely because they were not adequately prepared for those kinds of academic environments by the education they received at levels at or below high school. And why were they not adequately prepared ? Likely becasue they were educated in a piss poor school system with none of the resources that that more economically viable whites and asians have access to. And why are they more likely to be educated within such poor conditions in the first place? We could trace this back to Kunta Kinte, Sacagawea and [Insert hispanic historical figure here]. This is not in any way meant to belittle the struggles that Asians have had to face in the US but honestly if you as an Asian immmigrant feel that you have the kinds of issues and face the kinds of challenges that blacks and native americans and hispanics historically and currently face in this country. You need a class in American history and not the Pocahontas version either.
4. This is just a theory. You might be able to make a case for black and native american oppression causing regression in eucation values. But hispanics immigrants face the same challenges as asian immigrants. other theory include genetic, cultural, personal attributes, values, environment.... ect.
So you want equal opportunity for all? How about investing into programs that ensure that at the very basic level, nomatter what economic situation a child faces at home, he has access to the best possible educational foundation? How about ensuring that by the time it comes to college and post grad institutions, all these students have had access to similar resources and the opportunity to develop whatever potential they have. Then you can say that such and such a person does not deserve to be admitted because they had the same things as we did and did not make the best of it.
5 You must live in a perfect world 😀
sound like socialism to me, rich people will always have more resources to develop more potential than poor people. now you can either overcome that unequalities through sheer effort or god-given intelligence or step back and enjoy the show.






bored so i will give a shot

Unfortunately for you, work is slow and Calculus has fried my brain so I have the time to focus my attention on this.

1. I notice you left whites out of the equation. You talk about effort. Lets see just how far your effort alone takes you if you are surrounded by poverty, and part of a group of people who for centuries were suppressed and relegated to the position of automatic underachievment. Effort alone would not teach a child how to read properly and work on math. Nomatter how bad he wants it, he will not learn as much as he could have if his school just does not have the resources available to make conditions optimum for him. Effort alone will not get that black/native american/hispanic person a job if there were not laws to ensure that they are not discrimated against because they" will not would not fit in" . Do you even realize that Affirmative Action goes far beyond education?

2. Reverse Discrimination..... What AA has been in effect for ~50 years and you are already screaming discrimination? Go talk about that to someone on an Indian Reservation Reservations which exist because of discriminations that have been going on ~400 years


3. "Well funded public schools" ? Why are all publics schools not as well funded so all students have the chance to become over achievers? And I doubt the idea is for low income students to "attend their top choice of college" seeing as the idea of graduating HS is hard enough talk less about attending college. And could it be that that minority student articulated their dreams and goals better than you did in their personal statements? Cold it be that the UG adcoms thought he had more potential than you?

4. "Just a theory"? I "might be able to make a case" ? 😱

5. If you truly believe that, I will not waste any more time debating this with you.
 
Unfortunately for you, work is slow and Calculus has fried my brain so I have the time to focus my attention on this.

1. I notice you left whites out of the equation. You talk about effort. Lets see just how far your effort alone takes you if you are surrounded by poverty, and part of a group of people who for centuries were suppressed and relegated to the position of automatic underachievment. Effort alone would not teach a child how to read properly and work on mathNo matterer how bad he wants it, he will not learn as much as he could have if his school just does not have the resources available to make conditions optimum for him.actually, i just forgot to put "white and asian", it wasnt done intentionally. we talking about high school senior here...they at least know how to access the internet. oh and some schools at lower income districts actually give away computer/ipad to students! talk about resources, the differences is largely negligible at this day and age. lol cute comparison though, but moot. Effort alone will not get that black/nativAmericanaHispanicic person a job if there were not laws to ensure that they are nodiscriminateded against because they" will not would not fit in" . Do you even realize that Affirmative Action goes far beyond education? I am all in for laws removing existing discrimination, but that is not in the same page as AA.

2. Reverse Discrimination..... What AA has been in effect for ~50 years and you are already screaming discrimination? Go talk about that to someone on an Indian Reservation Reservations which exist because of discriminations that have been going on ~400 years
What is your point here? the duration that AA has been in effect have no bearing on whether it is a flawed concept or not. It had been flawed 50 years ago, it is still flawed now.


3. "Well funded public schools" ? Why are all publics schools not as well funded so all students have the chance to become over achievers? cuz school district funding come from local tax. And I doubt the idea is for low income students to "attend their top choice of college" seeing as the idea of graduating HS is hard enough talk less about attending college. we are talking about the top 10% of the class here, this is a very competent group regardless of where they go to school And could it be that that minority student articulated their dreams and goals better than you did in their personal statements? PS is rarely the deciding factor, nice try. Cold it be that the UG adcoms thought he had more potential than you?
valid argument point here, if a person achieve something with less resources, does it means he/she have more potential? but then this is strictly concerning a socioeconomic comparison, not races.
4. "Just a theory"? I "might be able to make a case" ? 😱
surely you can do better than quoting me

5. If you truly believe that, I will not waste any more time debating this with you. shocking right? even in socialist country unequalities still exist (more even so). real life example: if you are poor, you are not gonna get that SAT/MCAT prep courses. you are not going to attend that private hs, or private university with more oportunities. you are not going to get that highly regarded tutor who charged 50 bucks an hour. But!!! you can studied yourself, maybe put in more works than your well-off peers, go to a state school with grants and scholarships so you can come out with no debts...and so on
the principle here is that government cannot fix everything! which is what I think you are leaning toward


Just as suspected, your thought patterns are highly idealogical; and you are a hardcore left-winger. I, on the other hand, is on the other side of the spectrum.
 
Last edited:
Just as suspected, your thought patterns are highly idealogical; and you are a hardcore left-winger. I, on the other hand, is on the other side of the spectrum.

Strong argument brah...
:sarcasm:
 
Just as suspected, your thought patterns are highly idealogical; and you are a hardcore left-winger. I, on the other hand, is on the other side of the spectrum.
Originally Posted by Freesia88 and again modified by tn4596
Unfortunately for you, work is slow and Calculus has fried my brain so I have the time to focus my attention on this.

1. I notice you left whites out of the equation. You talk about effort. Lets see just how far your effort alone takes you if you are surrounded by poverty, and part of a group of people who for centuries were suppressed and relegated to the position of automatic underachievment. Effort alone would not teach a child how to read properly and work on mathNo matterer how bad he wants it, he will not learn as much as he could have if his school just does not have the resources available to make conditions optimum for him.actually, 1 i just forgot to put "white and asian", it wasnt done intentionally. we talking about high school senior here...they at least know how to access the internet. oh and some schools at lower income districts actually give away computer/ipad to students! talk about resources, the differences is largely negligible at this day and age. lol cute comparison though, but moot. Effort alone will not get that black/nativAmericanaHispanicic person a job if there were not laws to ensure that they are nodiscriminateded against because they" will not would not fit in" . Do you even realize that Affirmative Action goes far beyond education? 2. I am all in for laws removing existing discrimination, but that is not in the same page as AA.

2. Reverse Discrimination..... What AA has been in effect for ~50 years and you are already screaming discrimination? Go talk about that to someone on an Indian Reservation Reservations which exist because of discriminations that have been going on ~400 years
3, What is your point here? the duration that AA has been in effect have no bearing on whether it is a flawed concept or not. It had been flawed 50 years ago, it is still flawed now.


3. "Well funded public schools" ? Why are all publics schools not as well funded so all students have the chance to become over achievers? 4 cuz school district funding come from local tax. And I doubt the idea is for low income students to "attend their top choice of college" seeing as the idea of graduating HS is hard enough talk less about attending college. 5 we are talking about the top 10% of the class here, this is a very competent group regardless of where they go to school And could it be that that minority student articulated their dreams and goals better than you did in their personal statements? 6 PS is rarely the deciding factor, nice try. Cold it be that the UG adcoms thought he had more potential than you?
7 valid argument point here, if a person achieve something with less resources, does it means he/she have more potential? but then this is strictly concerning a socioeconomic comparison, not races.
4. "Just a theory"? I "might be able to make a case" ?
8 surely you can do better than quoting me

5. If you truly believe that, I will not waste any more time debating this with you. 9 shocking right? even in socialist country unequalities still exist (more even so). real life example: if you are poor, you are not gonna get that SAT/MCAT prep courses. you are not going to attend that private hs, or private university with more oportunities. you are not going to get that highly regarded tutor who charged 50 bucks an hour. But!!! you can studied yourself, maybe put in more works than your well-off peers, go to a state school with grants and scholarships so you can come out with no debts...and so on
the principle here is that government cannot fix everything! which is what I think you are leaning toward


1. Hmmm...schools in the heart of the Black South and Native American reservations give away Ipads... and all these students know how to use the internet as a resource for education and self improvement. The differences are also negligible... I am not sure what version of these United States you live in buddy but it sure ain't mine.


2. Do you even know what AA is? What it's goals are? Because reading that statement I get the distinct impression that you do not.

3. My point is that I find it amusing and ironic that a society (and a group of people) who perpetuated systematic discrimination for hundreds of years now bitch and whine when the tables are turned on them. At least this form of "discrimination" is not designed to crush human beings under the weight of despair and hopelessness.. AA is not perfect but until a way is found to make it more effective or replace it with something that addresses the complexities of the case, it is what we have.

4.Ii suppose the SCOTUS is a local court too, seeing as they have been dragged into this after the case was knocked down by pretty much all the local courts it went to.

5. Actually Ms. Fisher was not part of the top 10%. And just out of curiosity, who do you think constitute most of that top 10%?

6. Oh but it is! Do your research into the Fisher case and you will see that of those not automatically selected by being in the top 10% other factors including PS's counted.

7. But then which races again are more likely to be disadvantages socioeconomically?

8. Some levels of ignorance are just not worth responding to

9. Well we might as well revert to the natural state of things then. Survival of the fittest in every aspect of life. Any man for himself.

Government definitely cannot fix everything (and if you want to have that discussion i will be glad to accommodate you) but government can and should facilitate and play the role or arbiter to ensure that those who do not have..especially when their circumstances were engineered by powers beyond them, can have a fighting chance.


I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding as to what it really takes to become a successful person. Motivation is a key factor but motivation without opportunity and the right environment can motivate for as long as it wants and it will go no where... Disagree?

Let's leave the US for a bit.... lets go to Africa!!!

Hundreds of thousands of motivated young Africans who graduate with top honors from college and high school end up as hawkers on the streets. Were they motivated to be educated Yep. Did their parents encourage them? are they raised in the proper environment to foster success? In most cases yes... to have gone that far in education. Do they have opportunity to do better than hawking tawdry chinese-made trinkets? Nope.I guess you could say the ones smart enough to scam stupid westerners out of millions of dollars found an opportunity to use their education to their benefit.

How about the millions of other African children who do not go to school? Are they motivated? Do they want to learn? Do they want to be successful? You have no idea how much. But grow up listening to your parents telling you that you are the son of a palm wine tapper and you are destined to be a palm wine tapper in turn, couple that with poorly funded schools and zero opportunity and what do you have:

Motivation - (proper environment + opportunity ) = No dice.

Why are poor Asians more likely to succeed than other poor minorities? Likely because not only do they have the motivation and proper environment, opportunities have been presented to them...some of which are guaranteed by the oft maligned Affirmative Action Act. But then, lets look at African American and native American and even Hispanic communities... Why is there so little motivation? Well...your parents and their parents and their parents going back again to Harriet Tubman, Sacagawea and Co. have been fed steady diets of you're nothing but a stupid ******, indian, wetback, beaner. They have been barred overtly from opportunity, proper environment and every bit of motivation crushed out of them..for generations...suddenly they are supposed to see the light? That takes a toll, whether you like it or not.

Asians were viewed in derogatory terms too in the US you argue, how is it that they are nolonger? Might it have something to do with the fact that China, India and many Asian countries are becoming powerhouses in their own right? Could that be a positive reinforcement cycle right there? Could it be a cultural thing? What culture do African Americans and Native Americans and even Hispanics have to draw inspiration from?

This whole issue cuts across so many aspects of life... I don't even know why we thing making things "equal" at the level of tertiary education will have any effect.
 
New minority label at CUNY: ‘White/Jewish’ :prof:

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/new_minority_label_at_cuny_jewish_orJZewejNjoC1c1cLA2d5J

Something isn’t kosher about a CUNY scheme to single out Jews, angry professors charge.

Touting a move to make its faculty more diverse, CUNY administrators have broken out Jews into a separate minority group: “White/Jewish.”

CUNY insists “some faculty” want the label, instead of being lumped in as just white. But the theistic tag has outraged both Jewish and non-Jewish professors, and sparked a furor.

“This is, as far as I know, the first time a religion has been introduced into any affirmative-action document,” said David Gordon, a history professor at Bronx Community College and the Graduate Center. “What would the response be to a category ‘White/Methodist?’ Silly? Irrelevant?”

“It’s an insult and idiotic,” said Hershey Friedman, deputy chairman of the Finance and Business Management Department at Brooklyn College. “Most Jews are brown-skinned. We also have black Jews and Asian Jews. Once you mix religion with race you’re opening a Pandora’s box — and you look stupid.”

The new White/Jewish category is discussed in a report on CUNY’s Diversity Action Plan, issued last month by CUNY Chancellor Matthew Goldstein. The plan is aimed at boosting the recruitment and inclusion of minorities.

A steering committee led by Joyce Moy, director of CUNY’s Asian Research Institute, ran faculty focus groups based on “identity.” The groups included “African-American/black, Asian, White/Jewish, Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgender, Hispanic/Latino, Individuals with disabilities, and Italian-American.”

CUNY targets Italian-Americans for affirmative action in response to lawsuits alleging bias.

CUNY spokesman Michael Arena explained: “In addition to a group organized for white faculty, some faculty expressed a strong affinity and need for a focus group comprised of Jewish faculty members. Such a group was assembled, and it contributed to the effort of gathering facts and opinions from a wide cross section of groups at CUNY campuses.”

But Jewish professors told The Post that marking them as Jews won’t make them the chosen people on campus — and may even shrink their ranks if Jews are found to be “overrepresented.”

“White,” said a Jewish professor at Kingsborough Community College, “is in every way a detriment to be categorized because of the push to hire minorities.”
An Irish-Catholic professor at Lehman College quipped: “I can get yellow stars to put on my colleagues’ arms,” referring to the badges that Jews were forced to wear in Nazi-occupied Europe.

The CUNY report, “Building on a Strong Foundation,” notes “positive changes in the gender, ethnic and racial composition of the faculty,” with several minority groups growing over 20 years.

Whites made up 61.8 percent of the full-time faculty in 2010, down from 73.6 percent in 1990, it says. Blacks make up 12.7 percent, up slightly from 11.6 percent. Asians jumped from 4.2 percent to 10.6 percent.

Among all students over the two decades, whites dropped from 39.3 percent, to 30.1 percent, but blacks also dipped from 29.8 percent to 25.4 percent. Hispanics increased from 20.1 percent to 27.1 percent, and Asians from 10.6 percent to 17.1 percent. No numbers of Jewish faculty or students are included.

Assemblyman Dov Hikind, who last week called on the state attorney general to investigate complaints of anti-Semitism in hiring at Brooklyn College, called the new Jewish category “abhorrent.”

“I think it goes to the idea of ‘We have enough of this group, let’s get more of that group,’ ” Hikind said. “Diversity is a wonderful thing, but I think the university should hire the best and most qualified educators. If that means all professors are Asian, so be it.”

:corny:
 
1. Hmmm...schools in the heart of the black south and native american reservations give away ipads... And all these students know how to use the internet as a resource for education and self improvement. The differences are also negligible... I am not sure what version of these united states you live in buddy but it sure ain't mine.
they are doing it to replace textbooks. (i think a deposit is needed) for computers currently you can get a small dell laptop for 100 dollars if you sign up.

2. Do you even know what aa is? What it's goals are? Because reading that statement i get the distinct impression that you do not.
why dont you tell me your version of aa?

3. My point is that i find it amusing and ironic that a society (and a group of people) who perpetuated systematic discrimination for hundreds of years now bitch and whine when the tables are turned on them. At least this form of "discrimination" is not designed to crush human beings under the weight of despair and hopelessness.. Aa is not perfect but until a way is found to make it more effective or replace it with something that addresses the complexities of the case, it is what we have.
exactly, aa is not perfect. You know what is? No aa :d
4.ii suppose the scotus is a local court too, seeing as they have been dragged into this after the case was knocked down by pretty much all the local courts it went to.
huh?
5. Actually ms. Fisher was not part of the top 10%. And just out of curiosity, who do you think constitute most of that top 10%?
who do i think? I "know" top 10% is mostly asian and white. Even at lower income schools in my neighborhood, top 10% is largely asian immigrants. The disparity is large, these kids live in the same neighborhood, same school, same teachers...
6. Oh but it is! Do your research into the fisher case and you will see that of those not automatically selected by being in the top 10% other factors including ps's counted.
to the original question: Why out of 7 factors, race is the one being disputed. The main point is that race is the only unfair factor out of the 7. Fisher might have been rejected because of her ps, who know, but the fact that her race were also considered make this a case.
7. But then which races again are more likely to be disadvantages socioeconomically?
if they make it a socioeconomic system, then we wouldnt be having this convo. Just because a race is more likely to be disadvantage economically doesnt mean that we are going to assume that every person of that race is disadvantage and give them special treatments.
8. Some levels of ignorance are just not worth responding to
lol i am ignorant? Maybe you should read your own words belittling asian immigrants.
9. Well we might as well revert to the natural state of things then. Survival of the fittest in every aspect of life. Any man for himself.

Government definitely cannot fix everything (and if you want to have that discussion i will be glad to accommodate you) but government can and should facilitate and play the role or arbiter to ensure that those who do not have..especially when their circumstances were engineered by powers beyond them, can have a fighting chance.


I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding as to what it really takes to become a successful person. Motivation is a key factor but motivation without opportunity and the right environment can motivate for as long as it wants and it will go no where... Disagree?

Let's leave the us for a bit.... Lets go to africa!!!

Hundreds of thousands of motivated young africans who graduate with top honors from college and high school end up as hawkers on the streets. Were they motivated to be educated yep. Did their parents encourage them? Are they raised in the proper environment to foster success? In most cases yes... To have gone that far in education. Do they have opportunity to do better than hawking tawdry chinese-made trinkets? Nope.i guess you could say the ones smart enough to scam stupid westerners out of millions of dollars found an opportunity to use their education to their benefit.

How about the millions of other african children who do not go to school? Are they motivated? Do they want to learn? Do they want to be successful? You have no idea how much. But grow up listening to your parents telling you that you are the son of a palm wine tapper and you are destined to be a palm wine tapper in turn, couple that with poorly funded schools and zero opportunity and what do you have:

Motivation - (proper environment + opportunity ) = no dice.
you could only put this and i would get your point instead of writing all those paragraph. Us are not like africa lol, that comparison is pretty far fetched. As a student from a low income family, there are plenty of programs and oportunities to help you succeed. There are a few area where it is downright slums and there are absolutely no oportunities, but this is also a very small percentage. As i have said, if you care about your kids, you would not live there.
why are poor asians more likely to succeed than other poor minorities? Likely because not only do they have the motivation and proper environment, opportunities have been presented to them...some of which are guaranteed by the oft maligned affirmative action act. But then, lets look at african american and native american and even hispanic communities... Why is there so little motivation? Well...your parents and their parents and their parents going back again to harriet tubman, sacagawea and co. Have been fed steady diets of you're nothing but a stupid ******, indian, wetback, beaner. They have been barred overtly from opportunity, proper environment and every bit of motivation crushed out of them..for generations...suddenly they are supposed to see the light? That takes a toll, whether you like it or not.
what percentage of parents say those things to their kids? Should we assume that those parents all belong to a particular group/races and then give special treatment to everyone belonging to those races because of that percentage?
asians were viewed in derogatory terms too in the us you argue, how is it that they are nolonger? Might it have something to do with the fact that china, india and many asian countries are becoming powerhouses in their own right? Could that be a positive reinforcement cycle right there? Could it be a cultural thing? What culture do african americans and native americans and even hispanics have to draw inspiration from?
lol sound like a blame game. If you are lazy and didnt take advantage of your oportunities, all you have to blame is yourself, not your homeland/culture.
this whole issue cuts across so many aspects of life... I don't even know why we thing making things "equal" at the level of tertiary education will have any effect.
123
 
I can see the reasoning behind helping individuals with URM status, but according to the data it doesn't seem all that effective. I think the economic approach would benefit all. The minorities that are being passed up in the current system would be more likely to be considered, and the many individuals who try to pass off as minorities wouldn't be able to take advantage of the system either. The main reason Caucasians oppose URM advantage is because everyone knows at least someone who is half or 1/4 URM from a super rich family that gets in after putting forth less effort because they know they will get preference. This is who the system is helping the most currently. Yes it can also help URM who actually grew up at a disadvantage, but dividing by economic status would be a more efficient way targeting those who grew up without enough resources. Additionally, this system would also be equal in helping members of other races who are at an economic disadvantage.
 
Even a small safety net makes a huge difference in predicting success. That's something a lot of poor people don't have. If your car breaks down, and Dad can loan you $300 so you can get it fixed, that's huge. Most of us have safety nets SIGNIFICANTLY larger than that.

What amazes me to hear is the stories of all these people who have enormous safety nets with mommy and daddy paying for college.. and every rent check, ouchie, booboo, broke-down car, and emergency, who were brought up in an environment that praised work ethic instead of drug dealing, and who went to a school where teachers taught instead of spending all day trying to break up fights and teach kids how to act, talk about how they did it all by themselves through sheer force of will.

Scratch that. It actually embarrasses me.

We are a product of our environment. You're the exception though, sure. I'm sure if you were born to his parents, with his life experiences, in his neighborhood, with his lack of supervision and good role models, you'd be nothing like him. Yup. Sure.

I agree with the economic approach though. Statistically, socioeconomic status is a much better predictor of opportunity than race.
 
Last edited:
SDN Fam,

Other than the historically black college that favor URM (Black specifically) are there any schools that also highly consider URM applicants. There is obviously a URM advantage across the board, however is there more of an advantage at certain MD schools?

As a hispanic male with about average stats for MD schools (30 mcat 3.7 GPA, solid EC's solid LOR's etc.) what schools should i make sure and apply to next june.

Taking the instate % acceptance factor, im from CA.

If anyone can throw out some names from schools they currently are at or know about, or even schools that i SHOULD NOT apply to .
 
^^ Stay out of top 10 schools unless you like being the only cheeto in a bag of lays.
 
I wouldn't doubt it; minorities (asians and indians don't count) aren't very prevalent in big name medical schools.
 
I read the OP and then skipped to my own reply so I haven't really read anything on this thread since that first post. I couldn't read anymore after the OP talked about black applicants having a reduced chance of even applying. How is that even relevant when evaluating a "URM advantage" when it comes to med school acceptance? If someone has applied then they have applied. Many more ridiculous claims by the OP. It's a shame bc the post started out making these simple and valid claims from clear-cut data, and then jumped to making sweeping and inaccurate generalizations. Clearly the OP had an agenda and w/o reading the previous several pages of posts I have to believe that these sentiments have been echoed by others.
 
"Is it wrong for schools to look at some proxies for factors that may have contributed to these lower scores and consider them in the admissions process?"

That isn't a bad idea. Height is strongly correlated with IQ, probably in part because they are both affected by childhood environment as a child. Since height is correlated with disadvantages we could use it to adjust the standards for applicants with short applicants get a break for a low MCAT while tall applicants would need, say, a 35 when the average for the school is a 32.
 
"Is it wrong for schools to look at some proxies for factors that may have contributed to these lower scores and consider them in the admissions process?"

That isn't a bad idea. Height is strongly correlated with IQ, probably in part because they are both affected by childhood environment as a child. Since height is correlated with disadvantages we could use it to adjust the standards for applicants with short applicants get a break for a low MCAT while tall applicants would need, say, a 35 when the average for the school is a 32.

Or we could just put a measuring stick alongside the door to the admissions office with a sign that says, "You must be this tall to interview here." 🙄
 
"Is it wrong for schools to look at some proxies for factors that may have contributed to these lower scores and consider them in the admissions process?"

That isn't a bad idea. Height is strongly correlated with IQ, probably in part because they are both affected by childhood environment as a child. Since height is correlated with disadvantages we could use it to adjust the standards for applicants with short applicants get a break for a low MCAT while tall applicants would need, say, a 35 when the average for the school is a 32.

Increased height does correlate with increased MCAT. But that's only because 2 year olds aren't very good at verbal reasoning. amateurs
 
Increased height does correlate with increased MCAT. But that's only because 2 year olds aren't very good at verbal reasoning. amateurs

LOLZ

Sent from my SCH-I405 using SDN Mobile
 
Poor URMs are at a disadvantage but middle class to well off URMs are taking a fee ride👍
 
Blacks have the lowest applied/acceptance ratio, lowest GPAs, lowest MCATs, lowest faculty percentage lowest everything. Go to a medical school interview? How many blacks do you see? Yes, the current 3rd year class of Yale has only one black male. Out of 45,000 applicants only 3,000 blacks apply. While other URMs are increasing. What is scary is that with all of the affirmative action more black students are applying. In three years only 100 students had GPAs over 3.6 and MCAT over 33. ONLY ONE HUNDRED (Data published by AAMC Black Acceptance Grid). That means roughly 30-40 students annually. That is the average for White and Asian students and is considered sub-par for most applicants. Top schools like Ivies will settle for a 3.5 and a 30 from a black student because they really don't have that much else to choose from. Oh, and blacks with stats much lower than that have a hard time getting in, again that's why blacks have the lowest acceptance rate. When you look at the data you see a sweet spot everything over 30 and 3.4 has a good shot pretty much anywhere and everything lower than that doesn't. Now, when you take into consideration the fact that blacks mean stats are much lower than that you arrive at the fact the most do not get in. WE DO NOT TAKE SPOTs.
 
I wouldn't doubt it; minorities (asians and indians don't count) aren't very prevalent in big name medical schools.

URMs are very prevalent at big name medical schools. Penn has more Hispanics/African American students than Asian students which is a huge joke.
 
URMs are very prevalent at big name medical schools. Penn has more Hispanics/African American students than Asian students which is a huge joke.

penn state will forever be seen as a joke thanks to sandusky
 
URMs are very prevalent at big name medical schools. Penn has more Hispanics/African American students than Asian students which is a huge joke.

UPenn has 27 URM's and 28 Asians so no.

and anyway aren't Blacks & Hispanics roughly 1/3 of the American population vs. Asians being around 5%? If you were going for a population of med students which was reflective of the general population that we serve, Asians are still highly overrepresented here so I don't see what the big joke is.
 
UPenn has 27 URM's and 28 Asians so no.

and anyway aren't Blacks & Hispanics roughly 1/3 of the American population vs. Asians being around 5%? If you were going for a population of med students which was reflective of the general population that we serve, Asians are still highly overrepresented here so I don't see what the big joke is.

Maybe some schools are going for that, but many (e.g. top-tier research-oriented schools) clearly are not. Yet almost all schools practice affirmative action.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top