theory about wash u

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

bewitched1081

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2004
Messages
748
Reaction score
7
ive been thinking about this for awhile. i heard the debate about wash u and numbers. some say that it is sacrificing something by only accepting high stat students. well, it may not be sacrificing too much. first, because they recruit much more aggressively than any other top ten school. secondly, they interview many students relative to their class size. third, they go out of their way to impress interviewees. fourth, they offer generous financial aid packages. so what all this would add up to is that wash u would attract a large proportion of high stat students. from these students they can pick and choose which ones they want and attract them by making them feel wanted and giving them money. this can do wonders. therefore, high stat students with great personalities, ec's, lor's, etc. that could be drawn away by other big names may eventually choose wash u.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Jlee, I totally agree with your assertion! Nicely put! :laugh:
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Originally posted by jlee9531
ummm....nah 😀

i respond in a similar manner but with more humour and conviction to the theory of evolution.
 
Wash U admissions is a pure numbers game. I knew many of my classmates GPA's and MCATs when we all applied to Wash U, and you could have drew a line between those who were wait-listed and those who were accepted using numbers only.
 
Sounds like somebody is trying to convince themselves that Wash U isn't what everybody else thinks it is. When I took the MCAT 4 years ago, I had a 3.0 GPA at UCLA (mostly because I wanted to be a football player and hadn't thought about medicine) After I got my MCAT score which was higher than Wash U's average, a week later I got a letter from them congratulating me and strongly encouraging me to apply to Wash U. They were the only school that contacted me in any way shape or form. Made me feel like they cared more about my MCAT than me.
 
Originally posted by Jalby
Sounds like somebody is trying to convince themselves that Wash U isn't what everybody else thinks it is. When I took the MCAT 4 years ago, I had a 3.0 GPA at UCLA (mostly because I wanted to be a football player and hadn't thought about medicine) After I got my MCAT score which was higher than Wash U's average, a week later I got a letter from them congratulating me and strongly encouraging me to apply to Wash U. They were the only school that contacted me in any way shape or form. Made me feel like they cared more about my MCAT than me.

That letter scared the hell out of me too! As soon as I saw that, I decided not to apply to WashU.

That said, a lot of the criticism directed at WashU is unfair. WashU does quite well w/ residency and has excellent research facilities.
 
Originally posted by bigbaubdi
That said, a lot of the criticism directed at WashU is unfair. WashU does quite well w/ residency and has excellent research facilities.

No arguement there. Wash U is a great school. But if the question is whether they are numbers based or not (compared to other schools), I think that answer is fairly obvious. But I would expect it to have great research and residency placement. I would also expect it to have a higher than average number of gunners. People who focus and class and nothing else in college most likely would do the same in Med school.
 
Actually, I think WashU is a 100% numbers game. They are very concerned about their US News ranking. There was some discussion a while back about how far WashU would drop in the rankings if their admitted class had a GPA/MCAT average similar to Harvard or Hopkins. You can do the calculation yourself. Now that they've ascended to their current position in the rankings they intend to keep it that way, and they do it by actively recruiting those with big numbers (hence the lame post-MCAT mailings we all got). I wouldn't be surprised if their average GPA/MCAT numbers went up yet again this year. 🙄

tf
 
Originally posted by TheFlash
Actually, I think WashU is a 100% numbers game. They are very concerned about their US News ranking. There was some discussion a while back about how far WashU would drop in the rankings if their admitted class had a GPA/MCAT average similar to Harvard or Hopkins. You can do the calculation yourself. Now that they've ascended to their current position in the rankings they intend to keep it that way, and they do it by actively recruiting those with big numbers (hence the lame post-MCAT mailings we all got). I wouldn't be surprised if their average GPA/MCAT numbers went up yet again this year. 🙄

tf

They score high in other departments(residency director assesment, peer assessment, research dollars, etc) and I don't think they would drop very far if they had lower average GPA/MCAT. I think they would go down a few ranks at most.
 
Originally posted by Jalby
Sounds like somebody is trying to convince themselves that Wash U isn't what everybody else thinks it is. When I took the MCAT 4 years ago, I had a 3.0 GPA at UCLA (mostly because I wanted to be a football player and hadn't thought about medicine) After I got my MCAT score which was higher than Wash U's average, a week later I got a letter from them congratulating me and strongly encouraging me to apply to Wash U. They were the only school that contacted me in any way shape or form. Made me feel like they cared more about my MCAT than me.

Regardless of your MCAT score, they would have rejected you because of your GPA. Wash U focuses as intensively on GPA as they do on MCAT. They are tied with Hopkins for the highest GPA average in the USNews rankings. Much of the bad press they get is due to envy.

Also, I don't get the reasoning behind people criticizing Wash U for sending out recruitment letters based on MCAT score. Given the fact that Wash U is not as well known as many of the elite schools on the east and west coasts due to its location, how else is it supposed to attract brilliant students? I don't hear anyone criticizing Harvard, UPenn or Columbia for sending out recruitment letters to URMs. If for reasons beyond your control you are unable to attract certain segments of the population to your school, doesn't it make sense to judiciously recruit?
 
Originally posted by TheFlash
Actually, I think WashU is a 100% numbers game. They are very concerned about their US News ranking. There was some discussion a while back about how far WashU would drop in the rankings if their admitted class had a GPA/MCAT average similar to Harvard or Hopkins. You can do the calculation yourself. Now that they've ascended to their current position in the rankings they intend to keep it that way, and they do it by actively recruiting those with big numbers (hence the lame post-MCAT mailings we all got). I wouldn't be surprised if their average GPA/MCAT numbers went up yet again this year. 🙄

tf
This is a silly argument. Duke, Yale, Columbia, UPenn and UMich would also drop was it not for their admissions stats so why is Wash U being singled out?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Originally posted by Gbemi24
Also, I don't get the reasoning behind people criticizing Wash U for sending out recruitment letters based on MCAT score. Given the fact that Wash U is not as well known as many of the elite schools on the east and west coasts due to its location, how else is it supposed to attract brilliant students?

Other top schools such as UMich, Baylor, UChicago, etc.. are well known to applicants, despite not being on the east or west coast. Also I sincerely doubt that applicants to top med schools are not aware of US News rankings but I could be wrong about this.
 
Originally posted by bigbaubdi
Other top schools such as UMich, Baylor, UChicago, etc.. are well known to applicants, despite not being on the east or west coast. Also I sincerely doubt that applicants to top med schools are not aware of US News rankings but I could be wrong about this.

UMich has a great football program and gets a lot of publicity for it. UChicago is in CHICAGO, a major US city. Baylor is in Texas. Missouri is not exactly Texas is it? Texas is a big state with a lot of applicants. Applicants to top med schools might have heard of Wash U but they probably do not have it on their minds like they have Harvard, Stanford, JHU or Yale. So whats wrong with a little aggressive recruiting? Besides, the recruitment letter does not guarantee admission. It simply makes applicants aware of the opportunities at Wash U and invites them to apply.

Also, why don't you berate Harvard, UPenn and Columbia for sending recruitment letters to URMs that took the MCAT. After all how many URMs do you know that have not heard of these prestigious schools? This criticism of Wash U has no basis in reason.
 
Originally posted by Gbemi24
Regardless of your MCAT score, they would have rejected you because of your GPA.

Duh.

But that does prove my point. I got a 3.7+ the rest of my time at UCLA in the harder classes (not the prerec which I got the 3.0 in)with good research and good clinical and good EC's. If they wern't focused on the numbers as much, I would have gotten an interview there which I got at other big name schools.
 
Originally posted by Jalby
Duh.

But that does prove my point. I got a 3.7+ the rest of my time at UCLA in the harder classes (not the prerec which I got the 3.0 in)with good research and good clinical and good EC's. If they wern't focused on the numbers as much, I would have gotten an interview there which I got at other big name schools.

Well, you did not say you got a 3.7+ the rest of the time you were at UCLA in your original post. Last year, Wash U's GPA range was 3.22 to 4.0 so they do accept people with GPAs in the low 3s just like the other big name schools, but they do not accept many. Look, Wash U and JHU have the same GPA average so if Wash U is bad for accepting students with high GPAs then why isn't JHU bad? You are not being consistent. Columbia and Duke are very selective with regards to GPA/MCAT, but I don't here you criticizing them.
 
And what's the difference between MCAT's of JHU and Wash U??? Wash U has the top MCAT by a bunch and the #2 GPA. Why do you think that is?? I think it's because Wash U recruits people based on numbers more than other things. And I'm not the only person who thinks this. BTW, where do you happen to go??
 
Originally posted by Jalby
And what's the difference between MCAT's of JHU and Wash U??? Wash U has the top MCAT by a bunch and the #2 GPA. Why do you think that is?? I think it's because Wash U recruits people based on numbers more than other things. And I'm not the only person who thinks this. BTW, where do you happen to go??

Well the difference between Wash U and Columbia in terms of MCAT is much smaller than the difference between Columbia and Harvard, but I don't hear you accusing Columbia of being much more numbers oriented than Harvard. Another fact that many ignore is that 20% of Wash U's class is MSTP. Since MSTP programs accept students with higher stats than MD programs, Wash U's numbers are a bit inflated. If you take away the MSTPs, Wash U's numbers would be about the same as Columbia's or Duke's.

P.S. I am not in med school yet. I am still in the process of applying. Wash U, UPenn and Columbia are my top choices.
 
After I got my MCAT score which was higher than Wash U's average, a week later I got a letter from them congratulating me and strongly encouraging me to apply to Wash U. They were the only school that contacted me in any way shape or form. Made me feel like they cared more about my MCAT than me.

Washington University isn't the only school that does this kind of thing. I received similar correspondence from a couple other schools in addition to Wash U after I got my MCAT score.
 
I got a lot of mail from colleges after I took the PSATs/SATs...I thought this was a similar kind of thing.

How else are schools supposed to know about potentially great candidates other than through AAMC, who administers the MCATs?

besides, if you didn't want such mail I think there was some box you could have checked or unchecked.
 
to summarize previous posts and add a bit:

-wash u's gpa is not any different from hopkins (no one is giving hopkins crap)

-wash u's mcat is not significantly different than columbia (no crap dealt in that direction)

-wash u has a higher mstp percentage than most schools

-wash u gives out more merit scholarships than most schools in addition to the fully funded mstp positions

-wash u is known for actively recruiting students because of its location in the midwest and confusion about its name, hence recruitment letters. they send more mail for undergrad admissions than almost any school. by what other criteria would they send out letters? gpa and ec's would be impossible. furthermore, i received at least 3 other letters from schools soliciting my application, so they are not alone.
 
Originally posted by bewitched1081
ive been thinking about this for awhile. i heard the debate about wash u and numbers. some say that it is sacrificing something by only accepting high stat students. well, it may not be sacrificing too much. first, because they recruit much more aggressively than any other top ten school. secondly, they interview many students relative to their class size. third, they go out of their way to impress interviewees. fourth, they offer generous financial aid packages. so what all this would add up to is that wash u would attract a large proportion of high stat students. from these students they can pick and choose which ones they want and attract them by making them feel wanted and giving them money. this can do wonders. therefore, high stat students with great personalities, ec's, lor's, etc. that could be drawn away by other big names may eventually choose wash u.

Your theory is BS. Take a look at WashU's accept rate. It is WAY higher than any other top 10 school. They ahve to accept more students because the common admits to Harvard/UCSF/Hopkins/etc hardly ever choose WashU.
 
Originally posted by Kashue
They score high in other departments(residency director assesment, peer assessment, research dollars, etc) and I don't think they would drop very far if they had lower average GPA/MCAT. I think they would go down a few ranks at most.

You obviously dont understand US News methodology. If you change WashU's MCAT and GPA avg to Harvard/Hopkins, they drop out of the top 5.

Do the calculation and see for yourself.
 
You guys need to re-read the US News ranking methodology.

Of the student selectivity score (MCAT/GPA), 65% is devoted to MCAT.

65 ****ING PERCENT!

Now, look at WashU's MCAT avg. Its a full 1 point higher than Harvard/Hopkins.

WashU knows they have no chance of being top 5 without prostituting their school as an MCAT *****. They actively ignore other qualifications and instead focus on MCATs. If you redo the rankings with the same MCAT scores as Harvard/Hopkins, then WashU falls all the way down to #8.

BTW, WashU's MSTP MCAT scores are the same as other top schools, so that BS about how 20% of the class at WashU is MSTP is moot.

Before you label me as a WashU reject, let me issue a pre-emptive strike with the claim that I have an acceptance letter from their institution, and am prepared to fax it to anyone who wants it.
 
I'm mad at Wash U, so I thought that I would post in this thread. I interviewed at SLU in October and Wash U wouldn't grant me an interview while I was in town. Now they've granted me an interview several months later and I can't afford to fly all the way out there. Anyway, I feel like writing them a letter that says "sorry, you missed your chance."
 
Originally posted by MacGyver
Your theory is BS. Take a look at WashU's accept rate. It is WAY higher than any other top 10 school. They ahve to accept more students because the common admits to Harvard/UCSF/Hopkins/etc hardly ever choose WashU.

That is not necessarily true. Their high acceptance rate is due to the fact that they have fewer and higher caliber, academically speaking, applicants than the other elite schools.

Let's take a look at the 2002 data.


Wash U
Applied (2,847) Accepted (308) rate 10.8%

Hopkins
Applied (4,622) Accepted (260) rate 5.6%

Harvard
Applied (5,321) Accepted (246) rate 4.6%

UCSF
Applied (4,094) Accepted (237) rate 5.8%

Columbia
Applied (2,388) Accepted (290) rate 12.1%



If Wash U got as many applications as Harvard it would have a 5.7% acceptance rate. Which is in line with many of the elite schools. Wash U's acceptance rate is impressive given the fact that it has a lot of things working against it. Things like location and quality of applicants. Wash U's applicants on average have higher GPA/MCAT than applicants to other schools because Wash U recruits heavily based on MCAT. Given the statistical fact that students with high MCAT/GPA tend to have more acceptance options than those with moderate or low MCAT/GPA, the students Wash U accepts have more options than the students other elite schools accept. The fact that they have been able to achieve such a proportionally low acceptance rate is impressive.

Columbia has an even higher acceptance rate than Wash U. Does this mean a lot of students are turning down Columbia for other elite schools? Of course not! As you can see from the data above, Columbia does not get as many applicants as the other elite schools so it will have a higher acceptance rate. If Columbia had as many applicants as Harvard, it would have an acceptance of 5.5%. This is precisely why acceptance rate counts for only 5% in the selectivity rankings. It is very misleading. As I have said before, the criticisms of Wash U on SDN have no basis in reason.
 
Originally posted by MacGyver
You obviously dont understand US News methodology. If you change WashU's MCAT and GPA avg to Harvard/Hopkins, they drop out of the top 5.

Do the calculation and see for yourself.

If you do the same for Duke they will also drop out of the top 5. Also, that is a silly statement. It is similar to saying that if you change Harvard's NIH funding to Wash U's it will drop out of the top 5. That is not saying anything meaningful. Different schools have different strengths that is why rankings have to use a combination of different criteria to have any value.
 
Originally posted by MacGyver
BTW, WashU's MSTP MCAT scores are the same as other top schools, so that BS about how 20% of the class at WashU is MSTP is moot.


Obviously you do not reason well quantitatively. Other top schools having the same MSTP MCAT averages is meaningless in this debate unless 20% or higher of their students are MSTP.
 
A top 10 is a top 10.

WashU is a good school, so are Duke, UPenn, UCSF, Columbia, UMich, Stanford, Yale, and Harvard.

But of course, Hopkins' the best of the pack😀
 
Originally posted by CalBeE
A top 10 is a top 10.

WashU is a good school, so are Duke, UPenn, UCSF, Columbia, UMich, Stanford, Yale, and Harvard.

But of course, Hopkins' the best of the pack😀

gonna have to add ucsf with hopkins bro haha. gotta show some of that cali love.
 
Originally posted by Gbemi24
Obviously you do not reason well quantitatively. Other top schools having the same MSTP MCAT averages is meaningless in this debate unless 20% or higher of their students are MSTP.

You still dont get it. Most schools have MSTP class sizes of 10% or so.

WashU's MCAT is a full point HIGHER than Harvard/Hopkins.

You cant explain a full 1 point differential based on an extra 10 MSTP students. A 1 point difference in MCAT average is huge, implying an across the board increase in MCAT scores, not just MSTP MCATs.

If we were talking about a 0.3 or 0.6 differential, then your argument might have some merit. But a full 1 point cant be explained by just a large MSTP class size, ESPECIALLY when that translates only to an extra 10 students or so.
 
Originally posted by Abraham
whats an mstp ?

MSTP stands for medical scientist training program, which is an NIH funded MD/PhD program.
 
Rather than discussing this thing abstractly, let's do some math.

According to the 03-04 MSAR, WashU has about 120 people in their first year class. If 20% of WashU students are MSTP, then this means that approximately 24 of the 120 students are MSTP. Say these students have an average MCAT score of 38 (a ridiculously high average). For WashU to have an average MCAT score of 36.6, the rest of the 96 MD students would have to have an average MCAT score of 36.25.

Let's look at the schools with the next highest MCAT averages, Columbia and Duke.

Assume that about 10% of Columbia and Duke students are MSTP. Also assume that MSTP students have an average MCAT score of 38. Also assume that Columbia has a class of ~150 people and Duke has a class of ~100 people.

If you run the numbers, then you will find out that the average MCAT score of the MD students at Columbia and Duke is 35.4 and 34.4, respectively.

The bottom line is that WashU still has an average MCAT score that is much higher than other top schools.

And scholarships can't account for it - UPenn offers a lot of scholarships as well, yet it doesn't have such a high average MCAT score.

One factor might be the relatively low number of URMs at WashU, who tend to score lower on the MCAT.

- BTW, I have no intention of getting into another AA discussion
 
Along with the Olin scholarships one can easily say that 25% of WashU SOM is on a scholarship [i am not so sure how many med students win the Olin scholarship]. Add the 20% MSTPs or MD/PhDs and you see why they have such a high number.

Even if their numbers went down - their NIH money and residency directors score would be able to keep them in the top 5. Their numbers are just able to put them up there tied with Hopkins.

Whatever. I think WashU SOM is a great school beyond rankings. Everything about it is great. It is very hard to find other schools that are better in so many aspects. On top of that i was so surprised when i got to meet and talk with WashU students. They were really nice and down to earth and had a lot of interests outside of school (very active in the community as well).

If you like it apply there. If you don't then ... don't.
 
Originally posted by Tezzie
Along with the Olin scholarships one can easily say that 25% of WashU SOM is on a scholarship [i am not so sure how many med students win the Olin scholarship]. Add the 20% MSTPs or MD/PhDs and you see why they have such a high number.

Penn also gives out quite a few scholarships as well, but that doesn't bump their MCAT average up to anywhere near WashU's. It seems as though WashU is choosing to give out scholarships to ppl w/ high stats.

Originally posted by Tezzie
Whatever. I think WashU SOM is a great school beyond rankings. Everything about it is great. It is very hard to find other schools that are better in so many aspects. On top of that i was so surprised when i got to meet and talk with WashU students. They were really nice and down to earth and had a lot of interests outside of school (very active in the community as well).

WashU IS a great med school. The research opportunities there are fantastic and WashU grads do real well on match day. WashU definitely deserves to be up there w/ other top med schools. Heck almost 20 years ago, WashU was ranked #6. Give credit where credit is due.

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=59299&highlight=2003+US+News


However WashU can legitimately be criticized for its relatively small proportion of URMs.

Also it is reasonable to assume that WashU has a higher proportion of gunners. I'm sure that the vast majority of WashU students are students who have great stats with significant interests outside of the classroom, but that 36.6 MCAT average suggests that more of the gunner types may have slipped through the cracks at WashU than at other schools.
 
Originally posted by jlee9531
gonna have to add ucsf with hopkins bro haha. gotta show some of that cali love.

UCSF's the worst school ever cause they consider almost no foreign students at all 😛
 
Originally posted by ManchotPi
Now, as for the MSTPs. I think this is the best theory. Someone above claimed that there weren't enough MSTPs to make a difference. WashU's MSTP is 25% of the class, while other schools (except UPenn have under 10% of their class). School's with large med school class (like Harvard) have an even lower MSTP percentage. The difference between the size of WashU's MSTP and everyone else's is huge. This large number of MSTPs at WashU is certainly greater than the number of high-scoring-but-otherwise-incompetent applicants that are supposedly what WashU is filling its class with. So, it would be hard to hold that theory 1 holds while theory 3 is wrong.

Where is your evidence to support this? According to WashU's own page, ~25 students of their med class are MSTP. Given a class size of ~120, this equates to ~20%.

http://mstp.wustl.edu/students.html

Even if you take out high scoring MSTP students, WashU's average MCAT is still much higher than other med schools. Take a look at my previous post.
 
"Before you label me as a WashU reject, let me issue a pre-emptive strike with the claim that I have an acceptance letter from their institution, and am prepared to fax it to anyone who wants it."

if you're so against wash u, then why did you even apply?
 
Originally posted by bigbaubdi
Where is your evidence to support this? According to WashU's own page, ~25 students of their med class are MSTP. Given a class size of ~120, this equates to ~20%.

Even if you take out high scoring MSTP students, WashU's average MCAT is still much higher than other med schools. Take a look at my previous post.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by bigbaubdi
Other top schools such as UMich, Baylor, UChicago, etc.. are well known to applicants, despite not being on the east or west coast. Also I sincerely doubt that applicants to top med schools are not aware of US News rankings but I could be wrong about this.

Hmmm. I actually applied to a couple top ten schools without realizing what their ranking was at the time, WashU. was one of them. I don't think it's a number game, but what do I know?
 
Originally posted by efex101
Tezzie will you be attending Wash U? was this your top choice? just curious...

It is definately one of my top choices. Up there tied with Hopkins. I thought that i would be heading to Hopkins however given the situation with my bf that may never happen and i may as well stay here. Don't know for sure yet.

I cross my fingers for a scholarship also 🙂
 
rg porter is a nice person 🙂 good for you that you don't obsess over numbers.
 
Originally posted by ManchotPi
When I interviewed there however, my interview group had a larger percentage of URMs than I've run into elsewhere (of course one day is not a great sample size). Do you think these people are not being accepted due to low numbers? Or do you think that generally URMs get in and choose to go elsewhere (based on some perception that St. Louis is not a diverse city or something like that)?

Hmmm... you bring up some interesting points....

Well, I took a look at some of the URM data from the 2004 US News and World Report -

Percentage of students who are URM at Top 10 schools (for fall 2002) -

Harvard - 22%
Stanford - 21%
Duke - 19%
UMich - 15%
Yale - 15%
UCSF - 15%
Hopkins - 14%
Penn - 12%
Columbia - 11%
WashU - 8%

Average - 15.2%

Well, it appears as though WashU has a lower percentage of URMs than any other med school.

But even if WashU enrolled the average percentage of URMs at top med schools, would this have any substantial effect on their average MCAT score?

Let's take a somewhat extreme exaggeration and see what happens. To get to the average percentage of URMs at top schools, WashU would have to increase its percentage of URMs from 8% to 15.2%. Say the average accepted URM has an average MCAT score of 31 whereas the average accepted non-URM has an average MCAT score of 38 (remember this is an extreme exaggeration). To maintain an enrollment of ~120 students/year, this would mean that WashU would have to enroll an additional 9 URM students and reject 9 non-URMs.

What does this do to WashU's average MCAT score of 36.6?

WashU's average MCAT score would decrease to 36.075, a decrease of approximately half a point.

After this, lets see what happens when we subtract a few MSTPers. Say WashU decides then to reduce its number of MSTPers to the average of 10%.

Let's say that WashU MSTPers have an average MCAT score of 38 whereas WashU MD students have an average MCAT score of 34. To reduce WashU's percentage of MSTPers to 10%, WashU would have to enroll an additional 12 MD students and reject 12 MSTPers.

Now what does this do to the average MCAT score at WashU?

This reduces WashU's average MCAT score to 35.675 - which happens to be less than Columbia's average MCAT score!

I haven't taken account scholarships into any of these calculations - it is possible that scholarship students have much higher stats than other students. This doesn't seem to have too much of an effect on the average MCAT scores of other schools that offer scholarships (Penn comes to mind). However, if you took away the 10% of the WashU student body that received scholarships b/c of superstar credentials (great stats, ecs), then WashU's average MCAT score would drop an additional .4 points to approximately 35.275.

To put it another way, WashU's average MCAT score would be on par w/ other top med schools if it didn't offer scholarships, accepted the average number of URMs, and had an average sized MSTP program. About 1.3 points of WashU's high average MCAT score can be attributed to these 3 factors.

Of all of these factors, I think WashU can only criticized for its relatively low proportion of URMs.

However as you point out, the reason for this is unclear... Is WashU rejecting URM applicants or are URMs rejecting WashU? How many URMs reject WashU b/c of its low percentage of URMs or b/c of St. Louis? How many of WashU's scholarships go towards attracting URMs who would otherwise attend HMS, Hopkins, etc... Does WashU send out recruitment letters to URMs as they send out letters to ppl who get high MCAT scores? It's difficult to say w/ out knowing much about WashU's diversity initiatives. Maybe the diverse group of students you saw on your interview day was indicative of an increased effort to improve WashU's diversity.

In any case, it seems to me that most of the criticism leveled at WashU is unfair. I have to admit that I was guilty of this earlier, but as I did these calculations, it became clear to me that my earlier criticisms were misguided. I know that these calculations are only rough approximations but in doing them, it seems to me that WashU's high average MCAT score can be quantitatively accounted for without too much difficulty.
 
Thanks also Bigbaubdi for the interesting quantitative analysis of Wash Us relatively high MCAT average and also for Manchotpi and others for the points raised which were factored into the analysis.
I just wanted to add that in terms of drives towards improving diversity by exanding URMs at WashU, I heard that Wash U is instituting about 10 merit scholarships for URMs. So it seems the school is not ignoring the problem of diversity of the student body but rather are actually working to solve this.

Lets see what transpires in a few years to come.
 
i hate to throw a wrench in all this great analytical reasoning.... but, i know someone who got into WashU with an mcat <33, bcmp <3.4, overall gpa ~3.6, lots of clinical exp... so it is not just about the numbers 🙂

(edited for the sake of peace on earth and good will to (wo)mankind)
 
Top