Therapeutic Optometrists?

Started by PACtoDOC
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

PACtoDOC

1K Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Let me ask you guys about this. As a PA and now starting MS3, I have always sent my diabetic patients for routine ophthalmological exams but recently I have seen some of them coming back with notes from these therapeutic optometrists, even after I specifically make the referral to the ophtho. I am a little concernec about it. In fact, my wife being a type I for 6 years now, she just went to one of my professors who is an ophtho and she too came back home having seen the theapeutic optometrist. Has this become a standard of acceptance and should I just go with the flow, or does the ADA really want ophtho's themselves to be doing these exams? I don't really know the complexity involved in looking for diabetic retinopathy but I think this is sort of heading in one of those anesthesiology/CRNA directions. I just wonder what you future and current ophtho's think.
 
PACtoDOC said:
Has this become a standard of acceptance and should I just go with the flow, or does the ADA really want ophtho's themselves to be doing these exams? I don't really know the complexity involved in looking for diabetic retinopathy but I think this is sort of heading in one of those anesthesiology/CRNA directions. I just wonder what you future and current ophtho's think.

Optometrists do a good job screening for diabetic retinopathy. Optometrists should refer patients to general ophthalmologists when patients develop macula edema, severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, or proliferative diabetic retinopathy. I think optometrists should consult general ophthalmologists first instead of sending patients directly to a retina specialist.
 
Andrew_Doan said:
I think optometrists should consult general ophthalmologists first instead of sending patients directly to a retina specialist.

Dr. Doan,

Thanks for your post. I do believe the terminology in our profession is quite confusing and can be misleading.

On the second issue, I actually agree with your recommendation. Except for complicated fibrous tractional issues or proliferative problems, most general ophthalmologists do a great job in PRP, focal or grid laser. However, I do "interview" the ophthalmologist before I do send them as general ophthalmologists have different comfort levels themselves. My case load consists of 30-50 diabetics / week of varying stages of diabetic eye disease for the past 2 years.

Richard_Hom