debtfreee2019
New Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
This is why I support Trump's immigration policy
Started by debtfreee2019
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
- Status
The Mexican drug cartels have been using American gang members for decades.
How would immigration policies affect the actions of US citizens that were born here.
US born gang members famously gunned down priest at an airport.
If criminals don't obey gun laws, making gun laws useless why are immigration laws any better?
Immigrants are like guns.
You can't just use the lone spree shooter as justification to ban all guns. And you can't use the existence of criminals that happened to be foreign citizens as justification to unreasonably curtail immigration. Just like owning a reasonable semi-automatic for home protection should be a right, allowing legitimate refugees and immigrants in without delay should also be our goal.
And just like banning ridiculous guns that nobody needs like AA-12s, we should also have reasonable immigration control.
Trump's immigration policy is written by literal fascist Stephen Miller and is ridiculously heavy-handed.
You can't just use the lone spree shooter as justification to ban all guns. And you can't use the existence of criminals that happened to be foreign citizens as justification to unreasonably curtail immigration. Just like owning a reasonable semi-automatic for home protection should be a right, allowing legitimate refugees and immigrants in without delay should also be our goal.
And just like banning ridiculous guns that nobody needs like AA-12s, we should also have reasonable immigration control.
Trump's immigration policy is written by literal fascist Stephen Miller and is ridiculously heavy-handed.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
This is how you know the only thing politicians care about is getting elected.
Trump called their bluff and said ok you want immigrants, I'll send all of them to sanctuary cities. Democrats response, no that's not fair, you are just using them as political weapons.
Is he? Or is he showing the Democrats don't want immigrants in their precious cities but instead want them everywhere to have possible future votes
Trump called their bluff and said ok you want immigrants, I'll send all of them to sanctuary cities. Democrats response, no that's not fair, you are just using them as political weapons.
Is he? Or is he showing the Democrats don't want immigrants in their precious cities but instead want them everywhere to have possible future votes
These are U.S citizens. Trump immigration policy has nothing to do with them.
Just look at how many illegals have come into this country this year and last year. His policy has not worked. It is all talk. He needs to compromise with the Democrats and come up with an immigration policy that actually work.
Just look at how many illegals have come into this country this year and last year. His policy has not worked. It is all talk. He needs to compromise with the Democrats and come up with an immigration policy that actually work.
The Mueller inquiry wasn't based off of a false conspiracy theory and actually netted a profit after prosecuting all of the criminals involved.
This is false equivalency. Illegal use of an inanimate object and trying to keep the country's humanity intact while preventing entry of dangerous criminals are totally unrelated.
That profit going back into the pockets of the taxpayers?
Bull****.
You mean you want to keep the white majority intact.
I want an immigration policy that results in whites becoming the minority in this country.
It isn't. I'm comparing the logic behind the two issues, not comparing the two issues themselves.
False equivalency is when you take two unrelated things and make some sort of causality/correlation fallacy.
Like saying Kim Jung un and Sinead O'Connor both have stupid haircuts. Therefore both are evil because they have stupid hair and are the same.
My point is that perhaps we should exhibit nuance.
Last edited:
Because?
From what I understand, it goes to the US Treasury, so, yes, it is.
Wanting a white minority "just because" is just as nutty as what Trump does to asylum seekers. It's probably going to happen in 20-30 years or so either way, though.
Actually it cost about 30 million and will bring in about 30 to some say possibly 50 million.
Manafort alone could bring in over 40 million.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
No, that's not what I meant. I'm not willing to sacrifice the safety and constitutional rights of American citizens for people who break our immigration laws.
Typical leftist response. You don't care about equality or anything else you preach. It's all facade for your hatred of a group of people based on their skin color.
If this isn't blatant racism, I don't know what is. Pray we never meet prick.
Fair enough. Appreciate the insight.
Typical right wing nut response. Claim reverse racism. Cue you accusing me of being self loathing (safe space, snowflake, #MeToo). Our administration continues to be a slow burning pyre because of people who welcome being pissed on and told it's raining and then ask for more. Truly sad. The best lack all conviction, while the worst /Are full of passionate intensity.
The time and resources put into the investigation can never be recouped. Democrats spent the last two years trying to prove the POTUS is a Russian spy instead of working with the guy on immigration, social reform, healthcare, take your pick....
lol at the demonrats coming out of the wood work. You people have no idea how good you have it. All you want to do is destroy and tear down the systems that have created the freest, most technologically advanced society in human history.
Again, in the end it will have been a profitable investigation.
You are completely blind if you can't see the racism.
I don't know about these other people but I'm not a Democrat.
But are you a demonrat?
Yawn. A tired playbook.
- Status
Similar threads
