I don't really want to be a cash cow vehicle that was accepted just so I could help fund the doctoral program. Don't get me wrong as PhD students totally deserve funding but my experience working at an university opened my eyes to this practice. However, I digress as that is more of a philosophical issue.
I'm curious to know what schools operate like this. As a doctoral student myself, I know that I don't receive a single dollar from the university itself nor do any of my classmates (nor any of my friends in other doctoral programs--BU, UW, and Yale) because all of us are funded through a training or project grant. Natural and biomedical science programs are almost always funded through grants of some sort, not through tuition revenue.
What I described is not true of humanities and some social sciences as grants are rare in some of those fields. Funding generally comes from a portion of the endowment or education fund for many of these programs. This is one reason we've seen enrollment at many schools drop (particularly in humanities) for doctoral-level education: many are trying to reduce departments in the red.
Tuition revenue is generally used for direct student costs--facilities and resources, for the most part.
My take on BU as a former student
I was an epidemiology and environmental health student a few years back. I enjoyed my time there--I had the opportunity to be involved with research and worked on a project as a RA. I also had the chance to work in the community at a city health department to get the practical experience and that health department viewed BU very positively.
My pros:
+Friendly and knowledgeable faculty
+Most faculty are good teachers (at least the profs I had)
+Connected with most local health departments and state DPH (many faculty serve on local boards of health in their home cities)
+Broad focus on applied and practical health solutions in coursework (health law, for instance)
+Flexible scheduling/curriculum
+Variety of students from all walks of life
+Ability to have two areas of concentration
+Can finish in 3 (full-time) semesters
My cons:
-Research methods not required of all students (could be plus for some)
-Very focused on practical and applied public health (again, could be plus for some)
-Night classes for cores (so that the part-time students can take them)
-Limited school-provided funding for students to do internships/practicum
-Crummy party of town