Sorry for not replying, but I don't know any of the programs that you listed well enough. I bet this is why others haven't replied either--it is not that neurologists are "boring". There just aren't as many neurology residents and students worried about how much money they will make, where they will get in for residency, etc as say in radiology, IM (hoping to do GI), etc. These forums are designed for the neurotic, not the content.
Regarding your question about pediatric neurology programs in general: of course there is some correlation between the quality of pediatric programs and adult programs--but probably only as much as there is a correlation between pediatrics and medicine in general. A much stronger correlation clearly is between pediatrics and pediatric neurology. Thus, Stanford and WashU, while 2nd tier adult programs, are probably 1st tier pediatric neurology program. CHOB and CHOP fall into this top tier as well, while Columbia and JHU, which have great adult programs, don't have the best pediatric programs. Again, I don't know the programs you list very well, but I would suspect that UofCincinatti to have an excellent ped neuro program due to their reputation in peds.
This gets a little complicated if you want to do academics b/c then the quality of neuroscientific research also becomes important. Now the quality of the adult program becomes more important (especially since it will usually be an adult neurologist as a chairman hiring you--with notable exceptions such as at Stanford...)
Pediatric neurology is a great field to enter these days. New options for peds-epilepsy with surgery are dramatically changing the field. You also get to have a breadth of cases while being able to bill for EEGs. The demand for peds-neuro is through the roof and with new changes to Medicare coming soon, this will probably mean more renumeration in the end.
B
