To all img,s who have done EE after jan 2007

[innocent]

Hi all have u checked the equalence criteria at mcc website? Kindly see the following charts
1. Table 1. Relationship between Examination scores and percentile
ranking of the standard setting cohort.

EE Score Percentile Rank EE Score Percentile Rank

200 0.1 475 40.1
225 0.3 500 50.0
250 0.6 525 59.9
275 1.2 550 69.2
300 2.3 575 77.3
325 4.0 600 84.1
350 6.7 625 89.4
375 10.6 650 92.2
400 16.9 675 96.0
425 22.7 700 97.7
450 30.9

1. Table 1. Relationship between examination scores and percentile
ranking of the standard setting cohort.

EE Score Percentile Rank

50 0.0
100 0.0
150 0.8
175 2.7
200 7.8
225 17.9
250 33.7
260 41.3
270 49.2
271 50.0
280 57.1
290 64.8
300 71.9
325 86.0
350 94.3
375 98.1
400 99.5
450 100.0
500 100.0

1. Table 2. Relationship between MCCEE scores prior to January 2007 to MCCEE scores after January 2007

MCCEE scores before
January 2007 MCCEE scores after
January 2007
50 0 - 100
50 - 54 100 -125
54 - 103 125 - 150
103 - 153 150 - 175
153 - 202 175 - 200
202 - 252 200 - 225
252 -301 225 - 250
301 - 350 250 - 275
350 - 400 275 - 300
400 - 449 300 - 325
449 - 499 325 - 350
499 - 548 350 - 375
548 - 597 375 - 400
597 - 647 400 - 425
647 - 696 425 - 450
696 - 795 450 - 500
According to these tables if somebody has got 300 marks is at 71 percentile after 2007 and before 2007 the 71 percentile was at 560 marks so according to stats rules 560 should be equal to 300 but in the table to match both marks they r saying 300 is equal to 400 marks while 400 marks exist at 16.9 percentile which means equal to fail according to new scores.i know I m a bit confusing but see my point this is total unfair. I have send e mail to mcc asking about it plz all of u send then too so that they can think over it. Or if u feel it fair kindly make it clear to me thanks

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[bulgethetwine]

Hi all have u checked the equalence criteria at mcc website? Kindly see the following charts
1. Table 1. Relationship between Examination scores and percentile
ranking of the standard setting cohort.

EE Score Percentile Rank EE Score Percentile Rank

200 0.1 475 40.1
225 0.3 500 50.0
250 0.6 525 59.9
275 1.2 550 69.2
300 2.3 575 77.3
325 4.0 600 84.1
350 6.7 625 89.4
375 10.6 650 92.2
400 16.9 675 96.0
425 22.7 700 97.7
450 30.9

1. Table 1. Relationship between examination scores and percentile
ranking of the standard setting cohort.

EE Score Percentile Rank

50 0.0
100 0.0
150 0.8
175 2.7
200 7.8
225 17.9
250 33.7
260 41.3
270 49.2
271 50.0
280 57.1
290 64.8
300 71.9
325 86.0
350 94.3
375 98.1
400 99.5
450 100.0
500 100.0

1. Table 2. Relationship between MCCEE scores prior to January 2007 to MCCEE scores after January 2007

MCCEE scores before
January 2007 MCCEE scores after
January 2007
50 0 - 100
50 - 54 100 -125
54 - 103 125 - 150
103 - 153 150 - 175
153 - 202 175 - 200
202 - 252 200 - 225
252 -301 225 - 250
301 - 350 250 - 275
350 - 400 275 - 300
400 - 449 300 - 325
449 - 499 325 - 350
499 - 548 350 - 375
548 - 597 375 - 400
597 - 647 400 - 425
647 - 696 425 - 450
696 - 795 450 - 500
According to these tables if somebody has got 300 marks is at 71 percentile after 2007 and before 2007 the 71 percentile was at 560 marks so according to stats rules 560 should be equal to 300 but in the table to match both marks they r saying 300 is equal to 400 marks while 400 marks exist at 16.9 percentile which means equal to fail according to new scores.i know I m a bit confusing but see my point this is total unfair. I have send e mail to mcc asking about it plz all of u send then too so that they can think over it. Or if u feel it fair kindly make it clear to me thanks

I'm sorry, but due to your poor syntax and the overlapping display of the tables, I can't grasp what you're trying to say.

Can you try again please?