to bag or not to bag, that is the--

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

refreshingred

Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
My attending told me that after inducing I should give my sux or nimbex or whatever immediately, just like in RSI, AND not bag to see if I can ventilate. He stated that I should give the paralytic right after the induction agent for all patients. He said that it is NOT neccessary to bag the pt to see 'if i can ventilate before giving the paralytic.' His reasoning was that if i am that worried about NOT being able to bag a patient then my plan should have been awake fiber optic from the beggining. He said that the whole idea of FIRST seeing if one can bag a patient before you 'burn you bridges' with a paralytic is old fashioned and not based on the most current data. He underscored his point by asking: "If a patient isn't bagable after giving the induction agent what would any anesthesiologist do? They would intubate. Which is of course what you would do ANYWAY after giving the paralytic, so the bagging b4 paralyzing is superfluous.

Hope that makes sense. So, what is the current thinking on this? I can't seem to find much info on the net or in my textbooks that addresses this particular area.
 
refreshingred said:
My attending told me that after inducing I should give my sux or nimbex or whatever immediately, just like in RSI, AND not bag to see if I can ventilate. He stated that I should give the paralytic right after the induction agent for all patients. He said that it is NOT neccessary to bag the pt to see 'if i can ventilate before giving the paralytic.' His reasoning was that if i am that worried about NOT being able to bag a patient then my plan should have been awake fiber optic from the beggining. He said that the whole idea of FIRST seeing if one can bag a patient before you 'burn you bridges' with a paralytic is old fashioned and not based on the most current data. He underscored his point by asking: "If a patient isn't bagable after giving the induction agent what would any anesthesiologist do? They would intubate. Which is of course what you would do ANYWAY after giving the paralytic, so the bagging b4 paralyzing is superfluous.

Hope that makes sense. So, what is the current thinking on this? I can't seem to find much info on the net or in my textbooks that addresses this particular area.

You gonna wake the pt up now after inducing and apologize to them and the surgeon? Well maybe at some point but first....

You should go right to the paralytic and ventilate. If you cannot ventilate even with help then slap an LMA in and PAGE FOR HELP immediately. The scope will be brought over. The paralytic should facilitate your ability to ventilate via chest compliance etc. Why skip it?

Your airway assessment should prepare you for having LMA ,fiberoptic (awake or not), bougie etc in the room. And just because an airway looks like garbage it doesn't necessarily relate with a difficult intubation. You may have a great grade even though the pt was a pain in the arse to bag with an oral airway.
 
refreshingred said:
My attending told me that after inducing I should give my sux or nimbex or whatever immediately, just like in RSI, AND not bag to see if I can ventilate. He stated that I should give the paralytic right after the induction agent for all patients. He said that it is NOT neccessary to bag the pt to see 'if i can ventilate before giving the paralytic.' His reasoning was that if i am that worried about NOT being able to bag a patient then my plan should have been awake fiber optic from the beggining. He said that the whole idea of FIRST seeing if one can bag a patient before you 'burn you bridges' with a paralytic is old fashioned and not based on the most current data. He underscored his point by asking: "If a patient isn't bagable after giving the induction agent what would any anesthesiologist do? They would intubate. Which is of course what you would do ANYWAY after giving the paralytic, so the bagging b4 paralyzing is superfluous.

Hope that makes sense. So, what is the current thinking on this? I can't seem to find much info on the net or in my textbooks that addresses this particular area.

Great post....I agree with your attending more than I disagree with him.

When I see one of our students giving propofol, ventilating, then giving the succinylcholine, it goes like this:

Jet "Why did you wait to give the sux?"

SRNA "To make sure I can ventilate before I paralyze."

"Thats the right answer for your boards and your hard-ass, rigid instructors. Good job. But let me ask you a question...whens the last time you gave propofol/or whatever, had a hard time ventilating, and subsequently woke the patient up?"

"Uhhh...I don't think I've ever done that."

Exactly. My opinion is, at least for sux (which I like because when used properly it works well, works quickly so youre not wasting time waiting for the non-depolarizer to kick in, costs pennies), your parylitic given IMMEDIATELY after the patient looses lash reflex will give you optimum intubating conditions in 45 seconds. I dont think theres any harm in ventilating during this time and additionally, but for ASA 1 and 2 patients you dont really have to ventilate. On the other hand, if someone has low FRC for whatever reason or if the intubation takes a little longer than anticipated, if you've ventilated for that 45 seconds, you've bought yourself more time before desaturation occurs.

Bottom line is if you cant ventilate after the propofol, youre gonna give the relaxant anyway. and 99.99999% of the time you can ventilate well after the relaxant. On that rare occasion you cannot, the sux will wear off quickly, usually quickly enough that aggressive mask airway management will get you through. And if not, well, you STILL have options. I've had to put ONE 14" angio in the cricothyroid membrane and jet-ventilate in NINE YEARS of practice. No need to modify procedures for something that happens so rarely as long as you can handle it when it does happen.

My take, in conclusion, is to give the sux, usually no need to ventilate before you give it, but theres no harm in ventilating while youre waiting to intubate.

When using a nondepolarizer to intubate, if you have problems ventilating after giving the induction agent, you can switch to sux. Or, as your skill progresses, you'll probably just start giving it after loss of lid reflex. Problem is, if you run into the very-occasional difficult intubation (and many times this rare patient looks pre-op like you can intubate them), youve made it harder on yourself to fiberoptic cuz its easier when the cords are moving, or you have to bag for a while, or you have to resort to an LMA (which may not be appropriate for some cases).

The difficult intubation scenerio in private practice is more a pain in the ass than an emergency because if you have to do a surprise fiberoptic its gonna add 15 minutes or more...and in this scenerio its good to be in a MD-CRNA group because 2 clinicians are better than one.

If you are an MD doing your own cases, there may or may not be another doc available. And in this scenerio its a very lonely feeling.

In conclusion, I agree with your attending in the vast majority of cases.

This was the opinion of my Chairman at Tulane, Alan Grogono, and I've practiced how he preached. Incidentally he was a British dude who I never saw miss an intubation. Not once.
 
jetproppilot said:
Great post....I agree with your attending more than I disagree with him.

When I see one of our students giving propofol, ventilating, then giving the succinylcholine, it goes like this:

Jet "Why did you wait to give the sux?"

SRNA "To make sure I can ventilate before I paralyze."

"Thats the right answer for your boards and your hard-ass, rigid instructors. Good job. But let me ask you a question...whens the last time you gave propofol/or whatever, had a hard time ventilating, and subsequently woke the patient up?"

"Uhhh...I don't think I've ever done that."

Exactly. My opinion is, at least for sux (which I like because when used properly it works well, works quickly so youre not wasting time waiting for the non-depolarizer to kick in, costs pennies), your parylitic given IMMEDIATELY after the patient looses lash reflex will give you optimum intubating conditions in 45 seconds. I dont think theres any harm in ventilating during this time and additionally, but for ASA 1 and 2 patients you dont really have to ventilate. On the other hand, if someone has low FRC for whatever reason or if the intubation takes a little longer than anticipated, if you've ventilated for that 45 seconds, you've bought yourself more time before desaturation occurs.

Bottom line is if you cant ventilate after the propofol, youre gonna give the relaxant anyway. and 99.99999% of the time you can ventilate well after the relaxant. On that rare occasion you cannot, the sux will wear off quickly, usually quickly enough that aggressive mask airway management will get you through. And if not, well, you STILL have options. I've had to put ONE 14" angio in the cricothyroid membrane and jet-ventilate in NINE YEARS of practice. No need to modify procedures for something that happens so rarely as long as you can handle it when it does happen.

My take, in conclusion, is to give the sux, usually no need to ventilate before you give it, but theres no harm in ventilating while youre waiting to intubate.

When using a nondepolarizer to intubate, if you have problems ventilating after giving the induction agent, you can switch to sux. Or, as your skill progresses, you'll probably just start giving it after loss of lid reflex. Problem is, if you run into the very-occasional difficult intubation (and many times this rare patient looks pre-op like you can intubate them), youve made it harder on yourself to fiberoptic cuz its easier when the cords are moving, or you have to bag for a while, or you have to resort to an LMA (which may not be appropriate for some cases).

The difficult intubation scenerio in private practice is more a pain in the ass than an emergency because if you have to do a surprise fiberoptic its gonna add 15 minutes or more...and in this scenerio its good to be in a MD-CRNA group because 2 clinicians are better than one.

If you are an MD doing your own cases, there may or may not be another doc available. And in this scenerio its a very lonely feeling.

In conclusion, I agree with your attending in the vast majority of cases.

This was the opinion of my Chairman at Tulane, Alan Grogono, and I've practiced how he preached. Incidentally he was a British dude who I never saw miss an intubation. Not once.

Thanks Jet -- so what you're saying is that IF you plan to give NDMR & not sux you SHOULD bag before you intubate AND then if you cannot bag THEN you should NOT give the NDMR and give sux instead. But if you plan to use sux from the get go as your paralytic then what my attending has said holds true. Correct?
 
refreshingred said:
Thanks Jet -- so what you're saying is that IF you plan to give NDMR & not sux you SHOULD bag before you intubate AND then if you cannot bag THEN you should NOT give the NDMR and give sux instead. But if you plan to use sux from the get go as your paralytic then what my attending has said holds true. Correct?

Exactly. Thats the safest approach.

BUT, again, after you're out a while, or even after youre comfortable as a resident, and you're comfortable with your intubation skills/difficult airway skills, you'll end up blowing in a non-depolarizer right after loss of lid reflex, especially if you've got backup/extra clinicians to help.
I dont want you to think I'm saying your attending is WRONG, cuz I'm not, and really, there are not alotta "wrongs" in this business. Some, yes, but not alot. As long as you get the patient to PACU in good shape, you did nothing "wrong". Just so happens there is a plethora of styles and opinions on most subjects. And the above is my opinion/style.
 
jetproppilot said:
Exactly. Thats the safest approach.

BUT, again, after you're out a while, or even after youre comfortable as a resident, and you're comfortable with your intubation skills/difficult airway skills, you'll end up blowing in a non-depolarizer right after loss of lid reflex, especially if you've got backup/extra clinicians to help.
I dont want you to think I'm saying your attending is WRONG, cuz I'm not, and really, there are not alotta "wrongs" in this business. Some, yes, but not alot. As long as you get the patient to PACU in good shape, you did nothing "wrong". Just so happens there is a plethora of styles and opinions on most subjects. And the above is my opinion/style.

Whats gonna happen over the course of your residency, Refresh, is you will be exposed to many, many practice styles from your attendings, senior residents, and CRNAs at your institution. You will probably try most of the different styles/techniques, and you will adapt the ones you like best, effectively starting your own anesthesia-armamentarium. These will become "right" for you.

Remember, there are very few absolutes in this business. We all know the absolutes. DO NOT:
1) Administer triggering agents to known MH pts
2) Put a 22" spinal needle in the back of a critical aortic stenosis patient
3) Proceed with cavalier attitide to the OR with someone in fulminant pulmonary edema
4)etc etc etc

If you think about the breadth of our specialty, the "absolute" list is pretty short. Someone who tries to make the "absolute" list longer than it really is has not practiced high volume private practice anesthesia, and/or is not comfortable with their clinical judgement/skills.
 
I mask ventilate everyone while waiting for the nmb to work....it doesn't hurt, and definitely gives you extra time during largngoscopy if it turns out to be hard.

In marginal airways (I grade them adequate, marginal, inadequate---MP classification is not helpful), I will make sure I have an adequate mask airway prior to non-depolarizing NMB, but not before sux because sux will wear off, whereas non-depolarizing nmbs pretty much commits you to securing the airway one way or another.

I define marginal airways as those that I'm not sure about being able to intubate or mask ventilate, but plan on giving it a go with DL.

Inadequate airways are ones that get non-traditional methods of intubation, usually while they are spontaneously ventilating.
 
militarymd said:
I mask ventilate everyone while waiting for the nmb to work....it doesn't hurt, and definitely gives you extra time during largngoscopy if it turns out to be hard.

In marginal airways (I grade them adequate, marginal, inadequate---MP classification is not helpful), I will make sure I have an adequate mask airway prior to non-depolarizing NMB, but not before sux because sux will wear off, whereas non-depolarizing nmbs pretty much commits you to securing the airway one way or another.

I define marginal airways as those that I'm not sure about being able to intubate or mask ventilate, but plan on giving it a go with DL.

Inadequate airways are ones that get non-traditional methods of intubation, usually while they are spontaneously ventilating.

I do the same. I think that in residency, one of the most valuable skills learned is how to effectively mask ventilate almost everyone out there. We can all push the meds, start the lines, intubate, etc. But if your mask skills are poor you will get in trouble, quickly. Just look at the ER situation that you get called to when they can't secure an airway. Sats are piss poor. I usually end up getting the sats up by mask first then tube. Therefore , I agree with everyone here even your attending, but don't abandon the mask ventilation. I had a couple of attendings in my program that would make us mask the patient for the whole case. Its a little extreme but it works and now I mask all the breast jobs and other cases that I don't necessarily need to intubate. Yes they are breathing on their own shortly after induction but you still have to maintain their airway and without all the noises that can occur when masking them. These noises make the others in the room nervous.
 
If you are using a non depolarizer,, you should check to see if you can ventilate... However if you are using succinylcholine.. just give it..



IF after propofol you cant ventilate and you were going to use a non depolarizer you should switch plans and use succinylcholine to optimize your conditions fast..

The answer: If you do routine inductions with nondepolarizers you should check ventilation before giving paralytic because if you cant ventilate if you choose to paralyze that paralytic should not be a non depolarizers it should be succ.
 
davvid2700 said:
If you are using a non depolarizer,, you should check to see if you can ventilate... However if you are using succinylcholine.. just give it..



IF after propofol you cant ventilate and you were going to use a non depolarizer you should switch plans and use succinylcholine to optimize your conditions fast..

The answer: If you do routine inductions with nondepolarizers you should check ventilation before giving paralytic because if you cant ventilate if you choose to paralyze that paralytic should not be a non depolarizers it should be succ.

OK, you should do fine on the boards.
 
Top