gherelin said:
Hi OBP:
My experience is as a non-traditional coming out of 10+ years community non-profit work wanting to be able to do more to help people through medicine, and yes, some purely selfish aims like more intellectual challenges and making more money than the $30,000 I was making at the top of my game as a community service worker. Now, as a 3rd year resident, I have accumulated hundreds (thousands?) of individual experiences seeing, for example, one lauded faculty member who refers to patients publicly as "dirt bags","a program director who refers to the q-sign by sticking out her tongue and cocking her head in grotesque imitation of patients who have tragically suffered brain damage, OB residents who refer to pregnant woman casually as "whales," and everyone who laughs and jokes at the expense of patients who are obese, etc., etc., etc. At the same time, what is often valued, and will catapult you to being a chief resident, is a focus on "productivity," being a "warrior," being able to sleep the least, be cavalier about doing procedures you are poorly trained for, and figuring out how to make the most possible amount of money. I'll stop now because I'm sure I'm pissing people off and I really do not mean any of this as a personal attack, although I know from past experience some will take it as such and become emotional. But you asked, so I wanted to respond. For peds, I have only my pedi rotations -- 4 altogether, to judge, and while I liked some of them better-some just substituted financial greed for desire for academic prestige.
Cheers.
Thanks for the response. I'll try to respond quickly as I am in the middle of grant-writing season. What I think I'm reading is your displeasure with academics in three areas. Let me try to get them clarified and comment and then you can correct me or add more info.
1. Academic attendings don't respect patients.
2. Academic attendings don't communicate well with patients
3. Academic attendings are more interested in their own prestige than inspiring those around them.
In each case, the implication is that private attendings, presumably privates doing the same fields to be comparable in this description, do each of these things better.
I won't try to defend academics in these 3 areas, but I will comment from my experiences, especially based on pedi and to a lesser degree family-medicine faculty as this is your field.
Regarding #1 - well, this is always improper, and this topic is covered in detail in "House of God" and "Becoming a Doctor." I'm not convinced this is, especially in pediatrics, a major issue or that private attendings are better in this regard than academic ones. Regardless, there is certainly no need to do this to be successful in academic pediatrics.
Regarding #2 - This one, although you didn't separate it out, is the one that is most commonly held against academic faculty in the clinical practice area. From my corner of the world, I've always felt it was a bum rap. When we do rounds in an academic medical center, we expect and must have much of the communication with families done via residents, fellows, and NNP's. This is how they learn those skills. Although I have heard many times about how we don't talk to families like private docs do, I remain, from my experience, unconvinced this is true at all! Certainly, many of my colleagues are outstanding in the way they deal with families.
Regarding #3 - Now, here we have the crux of the matter. Is academic medicine a place where faculty are looking out for themselves or trying to serve the greater community? I could discuss this one for a while, but I note that, again, from my corner of the world, both domestic and especially international efforts to provide health care to the underserved are centered in the medical schools. Some do this much more than others of course. But it is increasing in many places. Personally, I know that it would be inconceivable for me to spend the type of time I do traveling internationally doing clinical education at overseas hospitals if it wasn't for the freedom of scheduling the academic world has given me.
Regarding the academics and the attitudes towards lack of sleep for residents and making money as the goal. Well, this is not part of anything I've ever seen in pediatrics, although I'm sure it exists "somewhere."
Thanks for your input - I appreciate the insights and the opportunity to discuss, not attack, in these debates. If medicine is to be improved, then these are worthwhile discussions.
Regards
OBP