Tooth decay a thing of the past?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
The dentist I shadowed the other day told me that even if they manage to find ways to significantly prevent tooth decay and things of that manner, there will always be kids who take spills on bikes that break teeth, adults that get into accidents, people who just neglect their teeth and don't utilize the news methods that do come out, etc.

He basically told me not to worry and that there will always be work and a need for dentists.

It even says it in the article, "However, Dijkhuizen doesn't expect that toothbrushes have had their day: 'it will always be necessary to clean your teeth.'" There will always be people who just simply do not take care of their teeth.
 
I'm sure dentists were worried about their future business when the US started adding fluoride to the public water.
 
It's kinda funny - I am a predent and want to go into dentistry to treat tooth decay in order to help others - but this article kinda scared me.

I always assumed that I would be able to work as a dentist for 30+ yrs once I'm done with school. Does anyone else worry about this?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/12/101203101341.htm

I haven't read the article, but don't worry. Dentists aren't going anywhere in terms of having work to do. Remember, there are still many people who believe that Fluoridated water should be abolished and that brushing your teeth with detergent is just as good, if not better, than toothpaste.

If you're going to worry about something, get on the increasing debt, decreasing payment worry train.
 
Very interesting article! Thanks for the post Yappy. With respect to the amount of debt we current dental students will have, it's very scary to think that someday technology of this sort may significantly reduce the patient pool. However, don't underestimate the challenges that need to be overcome to safely inhibit that enzyme. The researcher points out that glucansucrase and amylase have "virtually identical" active sites. This biological problem may prove to be as formidable as curing the common cold. That is, knowing the problem and solving it are two very different things. It freaks me out too, but there is no guarantee this is coming any time soon. Could be 10 years, could be 100, could be never.
 
Last edited:
A couple points that should calm your nerves a bit:

-70% of what general dentists do is replace old restorations (fracture, microleakage, ditched margins).

-Can you imagine if the general public was told "take THIS and dental decay will be thing of the past!" ???? This might even create more work for us to do! The typical American would probably be less likely to brush/floss, leading to more perio and thus more regenerative surgery/implants.


Bottom line- humans are lazy! As long as people with CVD consume McDonalds and smoke, I think it's safe to say that people will continue to neglect their oral health. Sad, but true.

Hup
 
Thanks guys for your words. I see how these claims being made in a science daily article may never come to meet their full expectation and change the deliverly of dentistry during our careers. Indeed, I've spent alot of time at school doing research for two years now and it has not really moved much...

This article can be related to a broader experience I've had. I tend to get two responses from people who know or have learned I'm attempting to enter the dental profession:

1.) "Oh man - this one time a dentist said I had problem X, but I know he was just trying to rip me off. Why do they always try to do that?"

2.) "Oh I never have to go to the dentist. Infact, I have not been in years. I just take great care of my teeth with my own home made tooth paiste. I'm on this new Paleo diet where I dont get decay - It's how we were made - you know... evolution.

I just listen and nod. I dont know enough about dentistry, decay or the field to have an informed opinion yet...

Though, I did once explain a sceintific article I had recently read to an "example #2 person" which discussed how pit/fissure cavities were found to form independent of low carb/sugar diets; however, they responded with:

"Yeah... but who paid for the study"....

me: "NIH"

them: "see... that's what I thought".

😕
 
Last edited:
So the microbial flora found in your mouth is so large that most researchers don't even have a good count at the number of different species found there.

Let's say that you knock out the enzyme found in a certain group of bacteria responsible for breaking down sugars. Who's to say that a different species of microbe with a different but similar enzyme would not then colonize? And who's to say that if you knock out strep mutans or any other natural flora from our mouths that it wouldn't lead to detrimental effects?

Long story short, messing with the natural flora in our mouths is extremely complicated which makes any one hit wonder drug very difficult to synthesize, test, and get approved.
 
Many individuals are caries-free or nearly so, and this is great progress. Many others though have a big issue with it still. The preventive strategy you link to looks quite interesting.

This is even more promising as a caries preventive, as it uses a protein from a natural enemy of Strep mutans to knock it off the teeth:

http://rickwilsondmd.typepad.com/rick_wilson_dmds_blog/2010/06/new-decay-preventing-strategy.html

However, it doesn't really matter what we do, there will (regrettably) be lots of caries for a long time to come. This is because there is an astonishing amount of sugar in our society, especially in liquid form. Between sucrose and other simple sugars, and high fructose corn syrup (which is in everything from sports drinks to breakfast cereals to, probably, the gasoline you put in your car and the mousse you groom your poodle with, due to the politicos and big agribusiness), people can easily overload their system with frequent carb challenges throughout all their days.

And many do.

Whatever preventive strategies we devise, for caries to form we still need: a host, the Strep, and substrate. Poor oral hygiene and simple sugar frequency add up to caries, every time. And it has been my observation that groups of people who started at lower socioeconomic status, but who have now experienced gains in that regard, often consume horrific amounts of sugar; they reach for the cookie jar first, so to speak. Economists say, "A rising tide lifts all boats." It's more like, "A rising tide buys root beer floats". And cavities.

Dental caries remains most upsetting for many of us in children, especially since it is such a preventable disease. And yet I also have more than once been almost reduced to tears of frustration by my older patients. Here's the scenario: We know them for years, maintaining 1960's-era crown and bridge, replacing or doing new crowns on occasion, but generally maintaining excellent oral health for these folks who had a hard start in their dental condition. And then-

Then they develop dry mouth, from age and/or drug side effects. And they develop a medical condition of some sort or other that renders them even more dry. So they take to cough lozenges- sugared ones!- or something equally vicious and, I swear this happens this fast, in less than six months they wreck their dentition. And then we have to clean up the mess...

So, no, I don't believe that dental caries is going to go away no matter what we do in the near future, in every age range, because any system can be overloaded by enough Strep mutans and enough sugar. Recall that the Strep grows to greater numbers as we feed it more...

We have a lot of other things to do anyway, like perio, endo, dealing with fractured cusps and such, and of course esthetics.

But, dang it, if tooth decay was reduced to a tiny fraction of its current levels next week- I wouldn't miss it one bit. It's bloody awful, the level of dental caries in modern American life.
 
Last edited:
No way. A vaccine to end tooth decay would be welcome....there are scores of other problems to handle and the dentist will not be out of work but he may find time to pursue better and advanced techniques
 
what about side effects? How do we know that the new bacteria will not be more aggressive?
 
Top