- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 2
isnt there an official ranking for general surgery programs, such as the one there is for ophthalmology for example?
A few things:
1) I don't think Baylor has any place on a top twenty list, Vandy has a far superior surgical experince and fellowship placement.
2) Colorado is a great program, that while not necessarily a top 20, offers fantastic training. They are rebuilding, but they will soon be considered elite.
3) I am an MS4, but have struggled like everyone else to make my list. If applying to one of the "elite programs," as well as other lesser known programs like my home school, are you thinking of writing two personal statements? Some of the things I want to accomplish in residency may not be possible at the lesser known programs. My personal statement may put some of these places off, and to ensure a spot at the end of the match, I am thinking of creating a toned down personal statement. Any thoughts?
I guess we will be seeing each other on the interview trail. Good luck to all.
Elliot
isnt there an official ranking for general surgery programs, such as the one there is for ophthalmology for example?
all surgeon make a **** load of money.
Again, another tidbit from my PD-- avoid the "clinics" for residency (Mayo, Cleveland etc) but target them for fellowship. As a resident, you might not get a ton of cases b/c fellows do so much
In addition, I won't change it here, but I think Hopkins is alive by reputation alone. The next few years under Dr. Freischlag will determine whether it will re-emerge as a front-runner. They have fallen from 1st in NIH funding 15 years ago to 31st currently...
i'll just put it out there now, i think hands down, the best general, and i emphasize general surgery program out there is university of miami. their broad scope of patients is unmatched. there is no place in the US that see's the vast population of immigrants, 3rd world (i.e advance stage disease, i.e operative, all classes of people and serves advanced tertiary needs WITHOUT a large influx of fellows that you see at a mayo or cleveland clinic. which means you, the general surgeon, not the fellow will get to do this case. i'm not at Uof M, but i did love the program when i interviewed. demographics , language barriers suck, but as far as a skilled surgeon who has seen a lot, miami.
general surgery has changed vastly over the past decade, and few centers now have the patient population to support comprehensive learning as it used to. things are more non operative, more medical therapy. all these things decrease the flow of patients. that coupled with the massive influx of specialist, the training of a general surgeon has definitely taken a hit. but jackson memorial i think is a place thats thriving, its a regional powerhouse in southern florida and serves a 350 mile radius off the coast
i'll take the dude you are crazy as hell comments now.
Some of the more "prestigious" programs have low pass rates and some obscure programs have extremely high pass rates.
There are only a few programs who's pass rate is > 90%.
There are even fewer well known programs with >90 % pass rate.
I am surprised this website hasn't picked up on this important data.
https://home.absurgery.org/xfer/fyp2007summary.pdf
I urge anyone interested in pursuing a surgery residency to look at these objective data
I scrubbed into a complex open AAA repair last year that included the renal arteries, and watched in awe as the chief resident (not fellow) and attending performed the case with without having to say as much as a word to each other.
in case you are still wondering- as someone who matched into a program that was in top 20 list mentioned, i did not get over 240 on boards and was top 1/3 of my class and not AOA. what matters are your recs and comments. most programs will take a hard worker over a test taker if you prove yourself on the wards. So much of getting in is based on your interview. clicking well with residents and attendings is what matters. 5 years is a long time when you work 80+ hours. Make sure you pick a program where the people you work with have similar social schedules that you do (ie if your single it's not a good idea to go to a program where everyone is married with kids) and you seem to get along with.
did anyone notice UT Southwestern's combined pass rate? 100%...far out!👍
Which one would you prefer? MGH or UT Southwestern?
The operative experience, call schedule and frequency, relations among residents?
Let's get some reviews folks 🙄
How about just which one is on probation and which one is not?
I think it's a temporary situation..Maybe i'm wrong, i don't know..
But in this topic we can(we should) continue comparing programs with each other..
This topic could contain priceless info about surg programs if everyone just writes their experiences, interview memories or so..
If you're trying to compare these two programs, then you need to learn some more about their basic attributes. This is like comparing apples and oranges. One is a historically strong academic program and the other, while academic, has a more community feel where most grads go into private practice. MGH is (was?) on probation, but you're kidding yourself if you think UTSW residents are under hours. They have a reputation for being malignant and working their residents very hard (pre-80 hour rule hard), and I can confirm it's true.Which one would you prefer? MGH or UT Southwestern?
The operative experience, call schedule and frequency, relations among residents?
Let's get some reviews folks 🙄
Bitsy3221 is a resident there. She posted this in another thread and it's really good.At any rate, since I am unaware of any SDN members who go to MGH you are unlikely to get any real information other than that gleaned from those who have interviewed there (which is dubious at best). Besides what does call schedule have to do with quality of education?
I am a resident at MGH, and very happy here, as is the overwhelming majority of my colleagues. I think as a whole, we are a happy, down to earth and supportive bunch who all work very hard. I am constantly impressed at how much my colleagues love what they do and how committed they are, and have found that this is so important when you are doing a job as stressful as this for as many hours a day that is required. This place can come across as a bit intimidating on interview day (which I suppose is kind of the point) so I can understand some people coming away from that with negative feelings.
I do know residents at BWH as well as former BWH residents who are now fellows at MGH, and after several long discussions contrasting the two places, I found that the overall opinion from within the two places is that MGH residents probably spend more hours in the hospital, if you will, than the Brigham. I think that despite the impression that people have that we are a more unhappy bunch than the Brigham residents, we tend to be a more cohesive bunch, and spend more time with each other socially outside the hospital.
As far as the OP's original question regarding research, I don't think either one is necessarily more or less research oriented, except that most residents at both programs (but not all) end up doing some sort of research. Both the hospitals themselves as well as Harvard has a lot of funding, which helps alleviate the stress on the resident of finding grant money. I think, though I have no figures to prove so, that more residents go straight through at MGH than at BWH. MGH residents do the majority of their rotations on-site, with rotations at two community hospitals and at Boston Children's (with the BWH residents). We have a Level I Burn center, and a Children's Hospital (including Pedi Trauma) on-site which BWH does not have (though they still see some burn patients as I understand). BWH experience includes rotations at the VA, which we do not have. I think the residents at MGH probably do more in the ORs sooner than BWH, but the numbers all equal in the end and the clinical experience overall seems very similar.
If anyone has any specific questions, please feel free to PM me.
To obtain some objective data look on the American Board of Surgery website for pass rates per program in the American Board of Surgery oral and written boards.
There are some interesting surprises.
Some of the more "prestigious" programs have low pass rates and some obscure programs have extremely high pass rates.
There are only a few programs who's pass rate is > 90%.
There are even fewer well known programs with >90 % pass rate.
I am surprised this website hasn't picked up on this important data.
https://home.absurgery.org/xfer/fyp2007summary.pdf
I urge anyone interested in pursuing a surgery residency to look at these objective data
If you're trying to compare these two programs, then you need to learn some more about their basic attributes. This is like comparing apples and oranges. One is a historically strong academic program and the other, while academic, has a more community feel where most grads go into private practice. MGH is (was?) on probation, but you're kidding yourself if you think UTSW residents are under hours. They have a reputation for being malignant and working their residents very hard (pre-80 hour rule hard), and I can confirm it's true.
Hey guys,
I have always considered Columbia to have a fantastic reputation as a training program however on the interview trail I was told by other programs included MGH, Mich, and NYU that Columbia has been losing many prominent faculty members and is on the downfall. Is there any truth to this? Can anyone shed some light?
Let's get serious, people.
That's right, no more messing around!
Not even a little? Please?
Let's get serious, people.
1. MGH
2. Hopkins
3. UCSF
4. UCLA
5. UW
6. UPenn
7. Columbia
8. B&W
9. WashU
10. Michigan
11. Vanderbilt
12. Emory
13. Pitt
14. UVA
15. Northwestern
16. UChicago
17. NYU
18. Cornell
19. UTSW
20. Minnesota
21. Wisconsin
22. Duke
23. Stanford
24. UAB
25. Louisville
Let's get serious, people.
1. MGH
2. Hopkins
3. UCSF
4. UCLA
5. UW
6. UPenn
7. Columbia
8. B&W
9. WashU
10. Michigan
11. Vanderbilt
12. Emory
13. Pitt
14. UVA
15. Northwestern
16. UChicago
17. NYU
18. Cornell
19. UTSW
20. Minnesota
21. Wisconsin
22. Duke
23. Stanford
24. UAB
25. Louisville
I can tell you that out of the most recent 5 year cycle (2005-2010) there are 8 programs with a 100% combined pass rate. Only 2 of them are University programs.
Minnesota in the list whereas UNC out ??😱
U Chicago, Northwestern & UVA better than Stanford, Duke, UAB & Louisville ??!! 😱😱
This post should be the end of the thread. It really summarizes this whole ranking nonsense.This has been discussed about a million times. There is marginal at best agreement on a "top 5" program list (consisting of the big name programs such as MGH and Hopkins). After that, there are about 30 programs that could stake a claim to being "top 10" and any attempts to rank them are going to be completely subjective and bound to offend someone.
According to Tarpley at Vandy there are five programs that carry a big name everywhere in the world...