

Long time lurker, first time poster. I am literally losing sleep over this. For admission to top tier schools from a below-average/average state school, does it make more sense to major in something easy and have time to buff up volunteer stuff or is it better to take a hard major and have less-developed activities?
I KNOW that everyone says major doesn't matter, but I feel as though having a high GPA in a difficult major from a state school will show adcoms at top tier schools that I actively pursued the most rigorous academic opportunities available rather than taking an easier route at a less academically rigorous schools.
Again, this question only applies to top tier schools. For low to mid tier, I am sure taking the easy major with strong ECs is the best way to go but I do not think this holds true for top tier.
Sorry if this is ignorant or neurotic, but does this still apply for extremely tough majors like electrical engineering or something? I feel as though top tier schools, which are heavily involved in medical research, would favor an engineer with good stats since stuff like electrical/mechanical/chem engineering is really useful in modern medical research.
Once again, I apologize for my neurotic nature but I hope people can give me genuine advice.
This is how I'm guessing the ad-coms typically think: 4.0 = 4.0.Long time lurker, first time poster. I am literally losing sleep over this. For admission to top tier schools from a below-average/average state school, does it make more sense to major in something easy and have time to buff up volunteer stuff or is it better to take a hard major and have less-developed activities?
I KNOW that everyone says major doesn't matter, but I feel as though having a high GPA in a difficult major from a state school will show adcoms at top tier schools that I actively pursued the most rigorous academic opportunities available rather than taking an easier route at a less academically rigorous schools.
Again, this question only applies to top tier schools. For low to mid tier, I am sure taking the easy major with strong ECs is the best way to go but I do not think this holds true for top tier.
First and foremost, thank you all for your prompt and thoughtful replies.
I do understand that it is important to do what you enjoy but it seems as though one has to give. If I did EE, I would enjoy the classes but would have little time to do other stuff (met with an advisor to plan out a schedule and it's a lot of course loads each semester plus summers). If I did a less rigorous major, say psychology (no offence but there are just less requirements for this major) I would have summers free and maybe even a semester or two free to have some really meaningful experiences.
As the above poster mentioned, people at top schools are very unique in their accomplishments. In this scenario of EE vs psych, the EE would be unique due to major but the psych major would be unique due to strong ECs and experiences.
Assuming GPA/MCAT are more or less equivalent in both scenarios, which would be preferable to heavy research schools?
Sorry if this is ignorant or neurotic, but does this still apply for extremely tough majors like electrical engineering or something? I feel as though top tier schools, which are heavily involved in medical research, would favor an engineer with good stats since stuff like electrical/mechanical/chem engineering is really useful in modern medical research.
Once again, I apologize for my neurotic nature but I hope people can give me genuine advice.
won't speak re: admissions but i will say engineering can provide you with a very unique and potentially disruptive skillset if you're of that inclination
Sorry if this is ignorant or neurotic, but does this still apply for extremely tough majors like electrical engineering or something? I feel as though top tier schools, which are heavily involved in medical research, would favor an engineer with good stats since stuff like electrical/mechanical/chem engineering is really useful in modern medical research.
Once again, I apologize for my neurotic nature but I hope people can give me genuine advice.
More often than not on this board we see people bite off more than they can chew by taking Engineering courses and end up screwing themselves out of getting into any medical school, ever.
Also, worry about getting into medical school period. More likely than not, you will be one of the 75% of pre-meds who aren't premeds at graduation.
What do you consider "good stats"? I would consider "good stats" to be the avg matriculate GPA which is approx 3.8. Getting a 3.8 in most engineering programs might actually be harder than medical school.
First and foremost, thank you all for your prompt and thoughtful replies.
I do understand that it is important to do what you enjoy but it seems as though one has to give. If I did EE, I would enjoy the classes but would have little time to do other stuff (met with an advisor to plan out a schedule and it's a lot of course loads each semester plus summers). If I did a less rigorous major, say psychology (no offence but there are just less requirements for this major) I would have summers free and maybe even a semester or two free to have some really meaningful experiences.
As the above poster mentioned, people at top schools are very unique in their accomplishments. In this scenario of EE vs psych, the EE would be unique due to major but the psych major would be unique due to strong ECs and experiences.
Assuming GPA/MCAT are more or less equivalent in both scenarios, which would be preferable to heavy research schools?
Isn't it more like 3.6? That's a fairly big difference from 3.8