Torque on a charged molecule

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

G1SG2

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
1,454
Reaction score
2
Consider a molecule with a dipole moment that is oriented between the two charged plates of a capacitor so that the dipole is at a 45 degree angle to the plates. The molecule will experience: no net force but a net torque.

Now, I thought it would've experienced no net force (since the charge is 0) AND no net torque, since the delta + and delta - sides of the moleces would be rotated in opposite directions and would cancel each other? TPR says "if we treat the molecule as containing two equal but oppositely charged ends (+q and -q), then each of these will experience an electric force in opposite directions and, as a result, the electric field exerts a torque on the molecule. The diagram also shows the ends of the molecule both moving in the counterclockwise direction, but says that they would experience a force in opposite directions? And then it says Tnet=T- + T= not equal to 0. How can this be??? Shouldn't the diagram show them moving in opposite directions since the force on them is opposite?

Edit: wait, are they moving in the same direction because they are oppositely charged? And so they move in the same direction (counterclockwise) creating a net torque??? Is that the correct reasoning?
 
Apply your right hand rule to the dipole. Pretend the + dipole is a + charge, and the - diople is a - charge.

The Net Forces will cancel but the torques wont. The object will have either CCW or CW torque.

I dont have the drawing infront of me but I remember this question. Its not moving its just spinning.
 
Apply your right hand rule to the dipole. Pretend the + dipole is a + charge, and the - diople is a - charge.

The Net Forces will cancel but the torques wont. The object will have either CCW or CW torque.

I dont have the drawing infront of me but I remember this question. Its not moving its just spinning.

Ohh, got it, thanks a lot!
 
do we really need to know the physics behind a dipole for the MCAT? i saw a similar pasage in Kaplan and they went into incredible detail...seems superfluous for this test but thats just me
 
do we really need to know the physics behind a dipole for the MCAT? i saw a similar pasage in Kaplan and they went into incredible detail...seems superfluous for this test but thats just me

Its applying general concepts to a novel situation. Isn't this what every MCAT passage is based on?
 
Top