treatment

moo

1K Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,423
7
    Our microbio prof in school told us not to worry about treatment for microbio. Do we have to worry about it for Step I? i.e., do we have to know that you use penicillin or vanco plus an aminoglycoside for enterococcus faecalis?
     

    Stinger86

    Intern year? Ha!
    7+ Year Member
    15+ Year Member
    Aug 15, 2003
    828
    4
    Palookaville
    1. Fellow [Any Field]
      Originally posted by moo
      Our microbio prof in school told us not to worry about treatment for microbio. Do we have to worry about it for Step I? i.e., do we have to know that you use penicillin or vanco plus an aminoglycoside for enterococcus faecalis?


      You damn well better believe it :)

      Antibiotics are pretty high-yield as far as pharmacology goes on the boards.
       
      About the Ads

      jed2023

      Senior Member
      7+ Year Member
      15+ Year Member
      Nov 11, 2002
      132
      1
      New York
        Originally posted by moo
        Our microbio prof in school told us not to worry about treatment for microbio. Do we have to worry about it for Step I? i.e., do we have to know that you use penicillin or vanco plus an aminoglycoside for enterococcus faecalis?

        I wonder why in the world your prof would give you this advice. Is it possible that you misinterpreted him? Because if you didn't, that sounds pretty outlandish.

        Every Step I review book I've seen that covers micro (including everyone's best friend, First Aid) discusses the spectrum of action of the various antibiotics. And even if it weren't required, you'd want to know it for 3rd year - and as a future physician.

        Imagine that you are starting your medicine rotation during third year. Your attending asks you, "What antibiotic can we give this patient with a Pseudomonas infection?" If you replied, "Penicillin G", he or she might think that you are mentally challenged.

        I'm just joking here, but I think all med students are expected to at least know the basics of what drugs cover which bugs.
         

        tega

        Senior Member
        7+ Year Member
        15+ Year Member
        Oct 19, 2002
        243
        1
          Originally posted by jed2023
          I wonder why in the world your prof would give you this advice. Is it possible that you misinterpreted him? Because if you didn't, that sounds pretty outlandish.

          Every Step I review book I've seen that covers micro (including everyone's best friend, First Aid) discusses the spectrum of action of the various antibiotics. And even if it weren't required, you'd want to know it for 3rd year - and as a future physician.

          Imagine that you are starting your medicine rotation during third year. Your attending asks you, "What antibiotic can we give this patient with a Pseudomonas infection?" If you replied, "Penicillin G", he or she might think that you are mentally challenged.

          I'm just joking here, but I think all med students are expected to at least know the basics of what drugs cover which bugs.

          the proff. probably expects anti-biotics to be covered during pharm.....thus his suggestion that they not be concerned about it during micro. But i doubt he believes he is going to send his students to the wards without any basic knowledge of microbial therapy.

          this is the issue i have with subject based curriculums.......i dont see the rationale in teaching bacteriology without a comprehensive coverage of anti-biotics simultaneously (not the 2 hour crap u get during introduction to bacteriology).....

          As for the OP ?.u can check katzung ch 51.??clinical use of antimicrobials?? has some really useful tables.
           
          This thread is more than 17 years old.

          Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

          1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
          2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
          3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
          4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
          5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
          6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
          7. This thread is locked.