True Parity

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
hoaxbuster,

This post just shows how little you know.

….but why isn't podiatry a part of mainstream medicine vis-a-vis an ACGME medical specialty?

DO residencies aren't ACGME accredited either. They have their own accrediting body.

Why is the DPM degree as unrecognizable today as it was twenty, thirty years ago?

This statement is way too generalized. Unrecognized?? Then how is it that DPM's are able to get hospital privileges? How are DPM's employed in Ortho groups? How are DPM's shareholders of surgery centers along side MD/DO's?

I do not know what part of the world you are in but can be confident it is in one of parts of the world where you are a limited license practitioner

1) Everyone is limited by training.

2) Yes it's possible for MD/DO to do another residency but there is still barriers...Board scores, funding, etc.

I am certain that you are mature, mindful practitioners who may be excellent foot and in some states ankle surgeons. But certainly you must on some level realize the limitations and exclusions.

You make it sound like only some states allow ankle surgery...MOST states allow ankle surgery. Last time I checked there were only 5 or so states that did not allow ankle surgery.


EDIT: And why were you acting like you are not the same poster as DPM2MD? Jonwill can see your IP address...
 
Last edited:
hoaxbuster,

This post just shows how little you know.



DO residencies aren't ACGME accredited either. They have their own accrediting body.



This statement is way too generalized. Unrecognized?? Then how is it that DPM's are able to get hospital privileges? How are DPM's employed in Ortho groups? How are DPM's shareholders of surgery centers along side MD/DO's?



1) Everyone is limited by training.

2) Yes it's possible for MD/DO to do another residency but there is still barriers...Board scores, funding, etc.



You make it sound like only some states allow ankle surgery...MOST states allow ankle surgery. Last time I checked there were only 5 or so states that did not allow ankle surgery.

This is about True Parity? …hmmm I mussa been off someplace else in my pea brain. I am so sorry to get those knees jerkin' - some pupeteer is workin' overtime…..I wouldn't wanna keep tit for tatting here on account there's always gonna be some lame excuse or shoddy disposition and thrusts to discredit the critic. Perhaps this goes to a degree of maturity or the notion that regardless of the issue ANY talking point can be dissected….lotsa luck, I may not have been convinced yesterday, that podiatry wasn't quite ready for TRUE PARITY but now, after this cannonade of chit chat….I think the answers have been revealed. Another decade of this sort of banter -
 
hoaxbuster,

This post just shows how little you know.



DO residencies aren't ACGME accredited either. They have their own accrediting body.



This statement is way too generalized. Unrecognized?? Then how is it that DPM's are able to get hospital privileges? How are DPM's employed in Ortho groups? How are DPM's shareholders of surgery centers along side MD/DO's?



1) Everyone is limited by training.

2) Yes it's possible for MD/DO to do another residency but there is still barriers...Board scores, funding, etc.



You make it sound like only some states allow ankle surgery...MOST states allow ankle surgery. Last time I checked there were only 5 or so states that did not allow ankle surgery.


EDIT: And why were you acting like you are not the same poster as DPM2MD? Jonwill can see your IP address...

Hey genius, did it ever occurr to you that this may be a public computer? Lotsa luck - openmindedness along with good asskissing skill will take you to great places…be sure to follow up in a decade.
 
This is about True Parity? …hmmm I mussa been off someplace else in my pea brain. I am so sorry to get those knees jerkin' - some pupeteer is workin' overtime…..I wouldn't wanna keep tit for tatting here on account there's always gonna be some lame excuse or shoddy disposition and thrusts to discredit the critic. Perhaps this goes to a degree of maturity or the notion that regardless of the issue ANY talking point can be dissected….lotsa luck, I may not have been convinced yesterday, that podiatry wasn't quite ready for TRUE PARITY but now, after this cannonade of chit chat….I think the answers have been revealed. Another decade of this sort of banter -

This is your problem. The details DO MATTER. If you were to go to the courts, AMA, AOA, ACGME, etc. with your rant without tying up all the lose ends of your argument then you will be ripped apart. You will be discredited and you will probably do more bad to podiatry than good. That's the hard truth. Take javajava's advice and turn it down a notch. Also take Podfather's advice and focus more on the details. Maybe then more people will listen to you.

Hey genius, did it ever occurr to you that this may be a public computer? Lotsa luck - openmindedness along with good asskissing skill will take you to great places…be sure to follow up in a decade.

So your friend went on the SAME computer and made a different account. Nice try.
 
This is your problem. The details DO MATTER. If you were to go to the courts, AMA, AOA, ACGME, etc. with your rant without tying up all the lose ends of your argument then you will be ripped apart. You will be discredited and you will probably do more bad to podiatry than good. That's the hard truth. Take javajava's advice and turn it down a notch. Also take Podfather's advice and focus more on the details. Maybe then more people will listen to you.









Last glance, this was still a chat board and the thread was titled TRUE PARITY.

If this was a courtroom my credentials would be entered into the record. I guess a voir dire would make me an expert. Ya' think?


So your friend went on the SAME computer and made a different account. Nice try.

I don't really have to try. I can be whatever character I chose. You're the one wasting time when you should be studying.
 
Last edited:
😴
This is your problem. The details DO MATTER. If you were to go to the courts, AMA, AOA, ACGME, etc. with your rant without tying up all the lose ends of your argument then you will be ripped apart. You will be discredited and you will probably do more bad to podiatry than good. That's the hard truth. Take javajava's advice and turn it down a notch. Also take Podfather's advice and focus more on the details. Maybe then more people will listen to you.

Last glance, this was still a chat board and the thread was titled TRUE PARITY.

If this was a courtroom my credentials would be entered into the record. I guess a voir dire would make me an expert. Ya' think?

I don't really have to try. I can be whatever character I chose. You're the one wasting time when you should be studying.
 
I don't really have to try. I can be whatever character I chose. You're the one wasting time when you should be studying.

You can be whatever character you choose to be. You are entitled to that. So why did you TRY and hide that DPM2MD and you were the same person?

It's posts like these where you lose credibility. Without credibility, no one will listen to you.

EDIT: I'm on summer break right now so I'm taking a break from studying. Now look who's off topic...
 
Last edited:
Now that's some good `rage'. Maybe there's soemthing I missed in those posts…c'mon point out the parts referencing any personal history that would suggest a dissatisfaction with life? Is there anything regarding my shotrcomings or failures (I've had a few, but not professionally and live a pretty well rounded and comfortable life)? I didn't write about anything that can't be substantiated, nor was there any negativity - maybe you interpreted these things as such. If you speak the way you write, you're pretty full of rage yourself - that's scary. I'd get some professional help. Things, as in change in podiatry, aren't moving fast enough? No. They aren't. The fact that podiatry was removed from medicaid in S. Carolina goes to this. The re-emergence of scope of practice considerations in California makes for these things too. Hey, what's wrong with corn and callus trimming? What's wrong with nail clipping? That is just plain mean. There are people out there who do this for a living and they'd most likely take offense. Negativity. Hmm…a knee-jerk response to rational criticisms. OK, I get it - this less-than mature response in another of a long line or responses to a rational proposal to advance podiatry, podiatric medicine and surgery, if you prefer, to the next level. Maybe you need to look no further than the closest mirror to see who is to blame - then again, I don't think blaming fits this particular paradigm. Podiatry (PM & S to me you dirty rotten negativist) is again at a turning point, maybe, some level headed folks can approach these things in a mature, clinical manner and advance some of the things impacting the profession. Do you think that name calling and writing flustered notes is going to make me and other like-minded folks go away? The word is, was, and will be out - you may chose to remain steadfast in defense of the status quo or take a deep breath and conduct yourself as a physician with a degree of abandon. This (podiaric change) is NOT a peronal dynamic, rather an opportunity to improve upon what currently exists in the 50 states with 50 scopes and the ongoing lack of parity, which, I believe is the topic - True Parity. You see, Angry Post Person, you don't know anything about me other than a certain degree of flexibility with language, knowledge of the podiatry profession and my claim of having gone to medical school (you really can't verify much more). But any prudent reader might find some of the things I am suggesting less-than negative, and a true attempt to enlist those forward thinking podiatrists in moving the profession through whatever means neccessary.

Cheers
Caddypod as ever was DPM MD caddypod at yahoo.com



You go around in circles, state the same things that other stated in your post back at them, and you have no structure or continuity in your writing. Please stop wasting your time and others. Its pointless to discuss anything with you.
 
You can be whatever character you choose to be. You are entitled to that. So why did you TRY and hide that DPM2MD and you were the same person?

It's posts like these where you lose credibility. Without credibility, no one will listen to you.


I guess that would make me incredible.

Have a nice day,

I have napping to do -
 
You can be whatever character you choose to be. You are entitled to that. So why did you TRY and hide that DPM2MD and you were the same person?

It's posts like these where you lose credibility. Without credibility, no one will listen to you.

EDIT: I'm on summer break right now so I'm taking a break from studying. Now look who's off topic...

….and so there, nyah nyah nyah- DPMs for the most part will not see Parity in any way, shape or form if this is a sample of podiatry's best and brightest…. Gotta love it, you've documented your own incongruity and inability to deal with unknown entities. Nonny nonny poo poo we are surgeons!!! Oh but we are on summer vacation…..wear your water wings!!!!
 
….and so there, nyah nyah nyah- DPMs for the most part will not see Parity in any way, shape or form if this is a sample of podiatry's best and brightest…. Gotta love it, you've documented your own incongruity and inability to deal with unknown entities. Nonny nonny poo poo we are surgeons!!! Oh but we are on summer vacation…..wear your water wings!!!!

MD/DO schools have summer breaks too. In fact Scholl is affiliated with an MD school and a I know of a few MD students who are on vacation in Cali, Mexico, Europe, etc. Although I shouldn't jump to conclusions. Maybe they are reviewing Biochem at the beach...who knows.

And you shouldn't jump to conclusions either. My summer break has consisted of This past Saturday, Sunday, and today. Tomorrow I start an NIH funded summer research program. I am also planning on reviewing 1st year courses. Definitely reviewing Lower Anatomy, Pod Med/Surg, and Biomechanics. Also gotta review Physiology...we are taking Pathology with the MD students next year and we gotta know what is "normal" to understand the "abnormal".
 
Jonwill ..... why is this person still posting can you please put a stop to this ? Its getting out of control . Thank you for your time !

TRUE PARITY SIX BANANAS AND A GIRAFFE WITH AN INGUINAL HERNIA

"I can't take it. I can't handle this. Why is this person still posting?…It's driving me mad," the young pod said.

"Pressure, son," the senior chat room leader said. "You have to be able to handle the pressure. Even though you're on summer break, free from thoroughly understanding drug mechanisms of action, physiology or doing a clerkship at a doc's office, you're going to have to tough it out."

"I can't take it! It's getting out of control! I think I have to change my underwear..."

-------

Note: You know, I've been chatting on physician chat rooms at other sites and haven't read anything like this stuff. There really isn't much dialogue, just some bizzaro fencing match in a zero gravity chamber filled with nitrous. The possiblility that some of you are going to be doctors of any sort is baffling in itself. But it is funny.
 
Let's get back on topic.

Did anyone else read the APMA email? "SVS welcomes Podiatrists as Physician members" http://www.multibriefs.com/briefs/apma/062011_1.pdf

Podiatrists are routinely excluded from the physician only sites and their chat rooms. I can't mention their names or I will get kicked off again sooner than I did last time. But a couple of sites I post at and chat with other physicians MD/DO do not allow DPMs on as physicians. It's nice the vascular surgeons let you in. But those sites, you know, the ones I mentioned, I don't think they let podiatry students in as medical students either. Who's gonna make a move to open that door? Is the podiatric intellect unable to converse in MD/DO chat rooms? To the outside oberver, it would appear so.
 
To the podiatrists favoring strides toward TRUE PARITY. Try this: Call some of your MD/DO friends, you students who sit next to them in basic science classes might find this a simple exercise. Ask them about the perks that accompany medical student status including but not limited to physician websites. Maybe some are not available to students, maybe residents … ask to log on with them and just lurk about. Follow some of the threads on topics from the inane to the most dire….after a few hours you'll pick up on a je ne sais quoie or a language unlike the colloquy you find at podiatric chat sites. This will give you a sense that MD/DOs communicate with a different mindset than podiatrists. There are many threads to choose from among all the medical specialties including but not limited to anesthesiology, physical medicine, dermatology, orthopedics, psychiatry, open forum, politics, entertainment, travel….just about all things people chat about in chat rooms. If you pay attention you will notice the subtleties absent in sites you are familiar with. If you visit a foreign land try to learn the language, if not at least get the accent down - This is a simple task which will spare you the absurdists notion that the things you don't particularly understand are not patently wrong or false…they are just conceptual constructs that you have not been introduced to. If I am wrong…so be it. If not? Nothing is lost but more exposure to a level of knowledge NOT readily available at podiatry zones. If you want to be treated as an equal, see what `equal' reads like, speaks like and over time you will come to expect other doctors to function intellectually at the same level. Step outside of the podiatric matrix - that simple - find a way into the conversations of MDs and DOs that you are forbidden to view. Maybe then you'll be mindful of the fact that there things outside of podiatry but within the realm of medicine. Sometimes when the doors are not open you have to listen carefully. What have you got to lose?
 
Last edited:
. Ask them about the perks that accompany medical student status including but not limited to physician websites.


Well that seals it for me. I was on the fence about what medical school, if any, to attend but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay up to a quarter of a million dollars for education and than be not let into an anonymous internet gathering. I don't care about helping people or having a stable family life, I just want to look cool on the net.

Thanks for opening my eyes.
 
Well that seals it for me. I was on the fence about what medical school, if any, to attend but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay up to a quarter of a million dollars for education and than be not let into an anonymous internet gathering. I don't care about helping people or having a stable family life, I just want to look cool on the net.

Thanks for opening my eyes.



Honestly this just goes to show you how much of a joke this person is. Pushing people like this to the side and ignoring them is the best option.
 
TRUE PARITY SIX BANANAS AND A GIRAFFE WITH AN INGUINAL HERNIA

"I can't take it. I can't handle this. Why is this person still posting?…It's driving me mad," the young pod said.

"Pressure, son," the senior chat room leader said. "You have to be able to handle the pressure. Even though you're on summer break, free from thoroughly understanding drug mechanisms of action, physiology or doing a clerkship at a doc's office, you're going to have to tough it out."

"I can't take it! It's getting out of control! I think I have to change my underwear..."

-------

Note: You know, I've been chatting on physician chat rooms at other sites and haven't read anything like this stuff. There really isn't much dialogue, just some bizzaro fencing match in a zero gravity chamber filled with nitrous. The possiblility that some of you are going to be doctors of any sort is baffling in itself. But it is funny.


You are a CLOWN! Please refrain from CLOWNING around and at least have some type of respect for yourself.
 
You are right, I was just having a little fun. I find it hard to believe that anybody, even the poster themselves, is taking this Charlie Sheen-like rant seriously.
 
Just ignore him/her.

Ya Id like to get back on topic about CA podiatrists as well

My bad. Now back to CA Pods.

Does anyone know how this agreement came about? The APMA, CMA, COA must have been talking about this for a while...this didn't happen over night.
 
Just ignore him/her.



My bad. Now back to CA Pods.

Does anyone know how this agreement came about? The APMA, CMA, COA must have been talking about this for a while...this didn't happen over night.


The first time I have ever heard of such talk was on Meet the Masters ... then it was on a little aside on PM news and then it made some serious headlines .
 
You are a CLOWN! Please refrain from CLOWNING around and at least have some type of respect for yourself.

Why?
I am a clown. Go and sign into an MD/DO site and read -you do want TRUE PARITY, right? See how MD/DOs conduct themselves. Try to take in the je ne sais quoi - get the accent down - You're in pod school, you post here because, I'd have to believe because you want PARITY, find out about what that means. It's not some unidimensionsal notion. I mentioned the MD/DO sites and the bounty of information MD/DOs have at thier disposal but don't let DPMs view or comment. If you want to see how MD/DOs conduct themselves - a sort of get into their heads exercise, find an MD or DO who posts at one of these sites. There are many of them. Find someone to help you log on and study the threads, like I said all topics, from anesthesiology, dermatology, orthopedics, current events, humor, politics - all thse things - the back and forth dialgoue. This is simple excercise once you find a way to get one of your MD/DO colleagues let you log in, once there, just go lurk for a few hours, certainly one of your MD DO side by side scholars or a resident can access one fo these RESTRICTED sites. You want to become a doctor? Start today. See how doctors converse amongst themselves. I can see that some of my posts are confusing, but; maybe some day you'll catch on. Maybe not.

I'm a clown, always was, always will be. But a clown with both DPM and MD degrees and not some whiny child…..There is no room in any field for those with a highly permeable exoskeleton. Then again there is an advanced locust program…..Now there's somthing to ponder!
 
Last edited:
I can tell you one thing, those of you here who post on the podiatry forum are very very very good at feeding trolls. If you all just stopped replying to his posts he'd eventually go away. Those that crave attention eventually leave to find it once their current source runs dry.
 
Yesterday I suggested that podiatry students and residents desiring TRUE PARITY gain entry to the sites reserved for MD/DO physicians and lurk. Read the threads, posts and general colloquy amongst a variety of medical specialsts about a host of topics ranging from the intricately complex to the mundane. These sites are exemplary of how physicians communicate with each other and the je ne se quois which is wholly lacking on any of the podiatry sites.

You can call me names, insult my personnae, ban me from the boards but the reality of this topic TRUE PARITY and the notions of achieveing these things are in play as we chat in California and the goal toward such ends. There will be people who walk the walk and talk the talk. So far, I have not seen the caliber of intellect/maturity or breadth and depth that the MD/DO posts suggest on the podiatry sites. There are several MD/DO sites available, two or three are the most regularly used by physicians. I use them daily to float questions, respond to such and appreciate the insights well as many of the off-color threads.

Given that podiatrists want TRUE PARITY, wouldn't it be a function of that desire to discover what goes on in the MD DO world? Unfortunately these sites are not open to podiatrists and if, podiatry is on par with physicians that'd be, in ANY manner of thinking questions and concerns as to why not…odd?

Because these sites are not open for DPMs to chat/post/read maybe podiatry students or residents can ask an MD or DO to let them study these sites. This will allow podiatrists entry into the dynamic and a glimpse into the thought processess of MD/DOs. Is it a be all and end all to anything? No.
But it does highlight a difference that the podiatrists do not want to acknowledge. There is a certain a nuanced demeanor, a pitch, tone or such lacking in podiatric writing/posting, you can see for yourselves. Is this negativity? Am I baiting you? No. Contrarily I am giving you a route to take a glimpse into a world that you state that you want to be a part of, hence TRUE PARITY. Before tossing this idea out, satisfy my curiousity and your own. Read what the MD/DO specalists write about and how they express themselves, not just on medical topics but on a host of things often dismissed by the podiatrist.

If you question my veracity. Fine. I go to these sites daily and post daily. I am assigned an ID # based on my credentials. Since SDN will not allow me to name these sites do a google search for physician only sites - certainly some names will appear,


Finally you ask, why am I posting here if I am an MD? I am helping discern some of the implications of integrating podiatry into the mainstream and have been tasked with doing so because I also have a DPM degree. Simply put: I'm putting together a healtchare guide for pre-med advisors, students, and the general public and am being subsidized to do so. Yes. I will get paid for these things. A by product might be helping podiatry. If you do not want my help - fine. I will use whatever material I get.

If you have any REAL qeustions or concerns email at caddypod at yahoo.com
 
Hoaxbuster,

I understand what you are saying (although I don't agree with some of it). I do agree that there are pockets throughout the country where pods still have issues. There are still a couple states where pods can't do ankles, there are still areas where pods don't have admitting privileges, etc. I get it. I think the issue a lot of us have is that you treat this as the rule when in fact it is, by far, the exception to the rule. In MOST areas, pods are treated as physicians and specialists. Podiatry residents are largely treated as regular residents and are treated no different than MD/DO residents on their intern rotations. Is that ALWAYS the case? Probably not. Are there still orthopods out there that trash pods? Of course but turf wars are a part of medicine and not limited to MD vs DPM. I just saw a doozy between vascular and IR.

I guess the true question is: What does parity mean? DPM's are limited by our degree to foot and ankle. MD/DO's are limited by training. Semantics, yes. Does it make any difference in the end? No, not really.
 
Hoaxbuster,

I understand what you are saying (although I don't agree with some of it). I do agree that there are pockets throughout the country where pods still have issues. There are still a couple states where pods can't do ankles, there are still areas where pods don't have admitting privileges, etc. I get it. I think the issue a lot of us have is that you treat this as the rule when in fact it is, by far, the exception to the rule. In MOST areas, pods are treated as physicians and specialists. Podiatry residents are largely treated as regular residents and are treated no different than MD/DO residents on their intern rotations. Is that ALWAYS the case? Probably not. Are there still orthopods out there that trash pods? Of course but turf wars are a part of medicine and not limited to MD vs DPM. I just saw a doozy between vascular and IR.

I guess the true question is: What does parity mean? DPM's are limited by our degree to foot and ankle. MD/DO's are limited by training. Semantics, yes. Does it make any difference in the end? No, not really.



Thank you for a prompt, timely response. Your comments skirt some of the more salient issues pertaining to True Parity. By breaking down the larger issue into arguable components such as state-by-state scopes of practice, begging the issue as to how DPM residents are treated by MD/DO residents, if orthopods are out to bash DPMs, you finally reach the polemic which remained dormant until the California evaluation of DPM schools/training for the purpose of expanding the scope of practice/degree surfaced.

This emotonally charged issue among podiatrists and assertions by podiatry students of equality among healthcare providers is in some parts semantic vis-a-vis limited to logistic and practical issues and in the prima facie evidence that DPMs are NOT considered physicians by the larger public as evidenced by their absence from inclusion in the above mentioned web sites whereby podiatrists are not permitted to converse in online chat rooms with physicians. Superficially this would seem petty, and to an extent superficial, but goes to the issue of this thread True Prity. I discussed in some depth an exercise in exploring these things by way of visiting some of these sites to explore, understand that there is a difference in the intellectual processes of DPM students and medical students. Is it good or bad, those are value judgements reserved for those personal moments and some self examination. Semanticism translates into a host of experiences and the information I've gleaned from podiatric residents is that although they do OB GYN, Internal Medicine, Pediatric etc. rotations they are mindul that these things will not go into their day to day life experiences as a podiatrist and are therefore approached and participated in, with a somewhat blithe mind-set. This again can be a tit for tat arguement that we can forestall for some later time when the major thrust of this thread is addressed, True Parity.

True Parity would suggest that DPM students are indoctrinated into mainstream medicine by way of participating in LCME core clerkships and USMLE examinations. (to assuage further disagreement you can insert osteopathic boards/clerkships) These things -boards, clerkships - along with wholly inegrating with MD or DO level students. Not just sitting side by side in a classroom but being able to take advantage of the overwhelming amount of information available to medial students including but not limited to the web sites that I've previously discussed and interractions with medical students. The ground-up buidling of a physician involves varying degrees of maturity and dealing with life and death. Podiatry students, residents and podiatrists DO NOT confront these things and as I've mentioned are mindful that serious medical illnesss is not part of the DPM role (I know that a cannonade of young pods will be fired up in this discussion about limb salvage and such but this is not what True Parity is about. It is about becomeing a physician. I am not deciding if podiatrists should have True Parity, however, what I write will be read by those powers who do make these decisions.

What we have here is a situation where podiatry students have the potential for an opportunity to become MDs (hypothetical) and I am exploring these things and see more and more trivial issues surfacing - Are they excuses or some other defense of the investment in a DPM education and degree. This thread is about True Parity and to suspect that increasing the amount of years in residency is not likely to meet that threshold. However a solution which MIGHT bring podiary into the fray is to introduce those things I've mentioned, USMLE, Core Clerkships integration (right now podiatry is highly secular) If podiatrists had the opportunity to read the physician only sites they'd get a better sense of how these matters are viewed, not just from this anonmymous poster (me) but by thousands of MD/DOs online throughout the course of a few hours. Floating a few questions about podiatry and its place in healthcare might offer some surprising information contradicting some of the doctorine propagated by the national and state podiatry associations and podiatrists steering away from these issues. True Parity is an intellectuallly level playing field which requires cooperation, coordination and an openmindendness that I do not see in the posts of podiatrists. There is the frequent knee-jerk responses and breakdown into assertions of anecdotal issues.

My solution would have the DPM to be MD do a one year rotating internship post graduate with full scope medical licensure. The routine care podiatrist would ideally be capable of managing the general medical primary care patient as well as if not more thoroughly than a PA or other extender. If this is demeaning or somehow construed as diminuitive or condescending, then the proposition that DPMs are ready to transition into the realm of physicians is much further off than 2015. You can reach me at caddypod at yahoo.com
 
Thank you for a prompt, timely response. Your comments skirt some of the more salient issues pertaining to True Parity. By breaking down the larger issue into arguable components such as state-by-state scopes of practice, begging the issue as to how DPM residents are treated by MD/DO residents, if orthopods are out to bash DPMs, you finally reach the polemic which remained dormant until the California evaluation of DPM schools/training for the purpose of expanding the scope of practice/degree surfaced.

This emotonally charged issue among podiatrists and assertions by podiatry students of equality among healthcare providers is in some parts semantic vis-a-vis limited to logistic and practical issues and in the prima facie evidence that DPMs are NOT considered physicians by the larger public as evidenced by their absence from inclusion in the above mentioned web sites whereby podiatrists are not permitted to converse in online chat rooms with physicians. Superficially this would seem petty, and to an extent superficial, but goes to the issue of this thread True Prity. I discussed in some depth an exercise in exploring these things by way of visiting some of these sites to explore, understand that there is a difference in the intellectual processes of DPM students and medical students. Is it good or bad, those are value judgements reserved for those personal moments and some self examination. Semanticism translates into a host of experiences and the information I've gleaned from podiatric residents is that although they do OB GYN, Internal Medicine, Pediatric etc. rotations they are mindul that these things will not go into their day to day life experiences as a podiatrist and are therefore approached and participated in, with a somewhat blithe mind-set. This again can be a tit for tat arguement that we can forestall for some later time when the major thrust of this thread is addressed, True Parity.

True Parity would suggest that DPM students are indoctrinated into mainstream medicine by way of participating in LCME core clerkships and USMLE examinations. (to assuage further disagreement you can insert osteopathic boards/clerkships) These things -boards, clerkships - along with wholly inegrating with MD or DO level students. Not just sitting side by side in a classroom but being able to take advantage of the overwhelming amount of information available to medial students including but not limited to the web sites that I've previously discussed and interractions with medical students. The ground-up buidling of a physician involves varying degrees of maturity and dealing with life and death. Podiatry students, residents and podiatrists DO NOT confront these things and as I've mentioned are mindful that serious medical illnesss is not part of the DPM role (I know that a cannonade of young pods will be fired up in this discussion about limb salvage and such but this is not what True Parity is about. It is about becomeing a physician. I am not deciding if podiatrists should have True Parity, however, what I write will be read by those powers who do make these decisions.

What we have here is a situation where podiatry students have the potential for an opportunity to become MDs (hypothetical) and I am exploring these things and see more and more trivial issues surfacing - Are they excuses or some other defense of the investment in a DPM education and degree. This thread is about True Parity and to suspect that increasing the amount of years in residency is not likely to meet that threshold. However a solution which MIGHT bring podiary into the fray is to introduce those things I've mentioned, USMLE, Core Clerkships integration (right now podiatry is highly secular) If podiatrists had the opportunity to read the physician only sites they'd get a better sense of how these matters are viewed, not just from this anonmymous poster (me) but by thousands of MD/DOs online throughout the course of a few hours. Floating a few questions about podiatry and its place in healthcare might offer some surprising information contradicting some of the doctorine propagated by the national and state podiatry associations and podiatrists steering away from these issues. True Parity is an intellectuallly level playing field which requires cooperation, coordination and an openmindendness that I do not see in the posts of podiatrists. There is the frequent knee-jerk responses and breakdown into assertions of anecdotal issues.

My solution would have the DPM to be MD do a one year rotating internship post graduate with full scope medical licensure. The routine care podiatrist would ideally be capable of managing the general medical primary care patient as well as if not more thoroughly than a PA or other extender. If this is demeaning or somehow construed as diminuitive or condescending, then the proposition that DPMs are ready to transition into the realm of physicians is much further off than 2015. You can reach me at caddypod at yahoo.com


I've sat back and read the banter, and now I will comment. Although many may be surprised, there is a lot of truth in THIS particular post that "hoaxbuster" has posted.

I believe hoaxbuster has the ability to provide some constructive comments based on his/her past experience(s) and years of practice, but it would be nice if he/she could leave the cynicism and sarcastic comments behind, since it must be realized that he/she is dealing with what I would call some relatively "fragile" students/residents on this site. As a result, they really don't want to constantly hear negative comments regarding their chosen profession.

I agree that there is no parity in the true sense of the word, and a lot of ducks have to be lined up for that to become a reality instead of a fantasy.

I am personally comfortable with the fact that I'm a DPM and have no qualms about the idea that I can't participate on an MD/DO site. I'm not an MD/DO. Similarly, electricians don't participate on sites for plumbers.

But I DO understand the point, since the MD/DO community does not consider a parity between professions, we CAN'T participate with their sites even if we are interested. And as previously stated, realistically, there is a lot that has to change for DPM's to obtain parity and not just the "want".

As per Podfather, in many venues and aspects we do have significant respect (and many would consider it a form of parity) regarding surgical privileges, hospital staff positions, public perception in some geographic areas, referrals from MD's/DO's, etc. And as Jonwill stated, in some aspects parity may be a matter of semantics.

However, when push comes to shove you are correct. At the present time there realistically is NOT parity and it will not happen overnight.

I believe that you have significant knowledge and experience, and would hope that in the future you would deliver your message to the students/residents on this forum in a more constructive way. It is their future and their chosen field, and it 'ain't so bad.
 
Because these sites are not open for DPMs to chat/post/read maybe podiatry students or residents can ask an MD or DO to let them study these sites. This will allow podiatrists entry into the dynamic and a glimpse into the thought processess of MD/DOs. Is it a be all and end all to anything? No.
But it does highlight a difference that the podiatrists do not want to acknowledge. There is a certain a nuanced demeanor, a pitch, tone or such lacking in podiatric writing/posting, you can see for yourselves. Is this negativity? Am I baiting you? No. Contrarily I am giving you a route to take a glimpse into a world that you state that you want to be a part of, hence TRUE PARITY. Before tossing this idea out, satisfy my curiousity and your own. Read what the MD/DO specalists write about and how they express themselves, not just on medical topics but on a host of things often dismissed by the podiatrist.

I really have a problem with this part of your argument. Half of all podiatry schools share classes with MD/DO students. I know for a fact that the schools that take classes with MD/DO take a "clinical reasoning" class with the med students. In these classes we learn how to think like a physician. For example, we are split into mixed groups of pod and med students where we are accompanied by MD/DO attendings and go through case studeies / see actual patients. We are let into the thought process of the attending and we learn to think like them.

Also (I'm only speaking for my class at Scholl) approximately 25-50% of my class has an immediate family member who is an MD/DO.

So I seriously doubt there's a difference in how medical students and podiatry students carry themselves in the current class. Maybe this was the case a few years ago before half of the podiatry schools were integrated with medical schools but I don't think this is the case now.
 
I really have a problem with this part of your argument. Half of all podiatry schools share classes with MD/DO students. I know for a fact that the schools that take classes with MD/DO take a "clinical reasoning" class with the med students. In these classes we learn how to think like a physician. For example, we are split into mixed groups of pod and med students where we are accompanied by MD/DO attendings and go through case studeies / see actual patients. We are let into the thought process of the attending and we learn to think like them.

Also (I'm only speaking for my class at Scholl) approximately 25-50% of my class has an immediate family member who is an MD/DO.

So I seriously doubt there's a difference in how medical students and podiatry students carry themselves in the current class. Maybe this was the case a few years ago before half of the podiatry schools were integrated with medical schools but I don't think this is the case now.

Agreed (speaking on behalf of DMU).


Edit: Note to hoaxbuster: Are your referring to the way the podiatric profession "speaks" based on SDN? If so, who cares how people talk on these online forums. You cannot judge a person accurately let alone an entire profession based on a forum. That is exactly what SDN is, an anonymous ONLINE forum where anyone who wishes to sign up is free to do so. Just check the MD or DO forums on SDN they "speak" the same as the rest of us.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for a prompt, timely response. Your comments skirt some of the more salient issues pertaining to True Parity. By breaking down the larger issue into arguable components such as state-by-state scopes of practice, begging the issue as to how DPM residents are treated by MD/DO residents, if orthopods are out to bash DPMs, you finally reach the polemic which remained dormant until the California evaluation of DPM schools/training for the purpose of expanding the scope of practice/degree surfaced.

This emotonally charged issue among podiatrists and assertions by podiatry students of equality among healthcare providers is in some parts semantic vis-a-vis limited to logistic and practical issues and in the prima facie evidence that DPMs are NOT considered physicians by the larger public as evidenced by their absence from inclusion in the above mentioned web sites whereby podiatrists are not permitted to converse in online chat rooms with physicians. Superficially this would seem petty, and to an extent superficial, but goes to the issue of this thread True Prity. I discussed in some depth an exercise in exploring these things by way of visiting some of these sites to explore, understand that there is a difference in the intellectual processes of DPM students and medical students. Is it good or bad, those are value judgements reserved for those personal moments and some self examination. Semanticism translates into a host of experiences and the information I've gleaned from podiatric residents is that although they do OB GYN, Internal Medicine, Pediatric etc. rotations they are mindul that these things will not go into their day to day life experiences as a podiatrist and are therefore approached and participated in, with a somewhat blithe mind-set. This again can be a tit for tat arguement that we can forestall for some later time when the major thrust of this thread is addressed, True Parity.

True Parity would suggest that DPM students are indoctrinated into mainstream medicine by way of participating in LCME core clerkships and USMLE examinations. (to assuage further disagreement you can insert osteopathic boards/clerkships) These things -boards, clerkships - along with wholly inegrating with MD or DO level students. Not just sitting side by side in a classroom but being able to take advantage of the overwhelming amount of information available to medial students including but not limited to the web sites that I've previously discussed and interractions with medical students. The ground-up buidling of a physician involves varying degrees of maturity and dealing with life and death. Podiatry students, residents and podiatrists DO NOT confront these things and as I've mentioned are mindful that serious medical illnesss is not part of the DPM role (I know that a cannonade of young pods will be fired up in this discussion about limb salvage and such but this is not what True Parity is about. It is about becomeing a physician. I am not deciding if podiatrists should have True Parity, however, what I write will be read by those powers who do make these decisions.

What we have here is a situation where podiatry students have the potential for an opportunity to become MDs (hypothetical) and I am exploring these things and see more and more trivial issues surfacing - Are they excuses or some other defense of the investment in a DPM education and degree. This thread is about True Parity and to suspect that increasing the amount of years in residency is not likely to meet that threshold. However a solution which MIGHT bring podiary into the fray is to introduce those things I've mentioned, USMLE, Core Clerkships integration (right now podiatry is highly secular) If podiatrists had the opportunity to read the physician only sites they'd get a better sense of how these matters are viewed, not just from this anonmymous poster (me) but by thousands of MD/DOs online throughout the course of a few hours. Floating a few questions about podiatry and its place in healthcare might offer some surprising information contradicting some of the doctorine propagated by the national and state podiatry associations and podiatrists steering away from these issues. True Parity is an intellectuallly level playing field which requires cooperation, coordination and an openmindendness that I do not see in the posts of podiatrists. There is the frequent knee-jerk responses and breakdown into assertions of anecdotal issues.

My solution would have the DPM to be MD do a one year rotating internship post graduate with full scope medical licensure. The routine care podiatrist would ideally be capable of managing the general medical primary care patient as well as if not more thoroughly than a PA or other extender. If this is demeaning or somehow construed as diminuitive or condescending, then the proposition that DPMs are ready to transition into the realm of physicians is much further off than 2015. You can reach me at caddypod at yahoo.com

So you want me to feel bad because some websites don't consider podiatrists to be physicians? That is easily countered by the fact that many doctors, insurance companies, and hospitals systems consider podiatrists to be physicians and members of medical staff (including chief of surgery, CMO, etc). Come on, I work with tons of MD's and am consulted daily by them. I went to school with a ton of DO's. They don't think any less of me because of my degree. They think of me as a foot and ankle specialist. So it is a weak argument when you say, "Oh, you don't know what they are saying about you". Yea, I do. I work with all of them.

I liked your point about doing a one year medical internship. Most podiatric residency programs already do that. Pod interns function on internal medicine, infectious disease, general surgery, vascular, plastics, etc and are given the same responsibilities as their MD/DO counterparts. It is for that reason that pods are now more easily able to get admitting privileges at hospitals.

Again, my question was: "What is true parity". PADPM brought up some excellent points. In the end, if DPM's received true parity, what would be the point of a DPM degree? You might as well make it an MD/DO specialty.
 
So you want me to feel bad because some websites don't consider podiatrists to be physicians? That is easily countered by the fact that many doctors, insurance companies, and hospitals systems consider podiatrists to be physicians and members of medical staff (including chief of surgery, CMO, etc). Come on, I work with tons of MD's and am consulted daily by them. I went to school with a ton of DO's. They don't think any less of me because of my degree. They think of me as a foot and ankle specialist. So it is a weak argument when you say, "Oh, you don't know what they are saying about you". Yea, I do. I work with all of them.

I liked your point about doing a one year medical internship. Most podiatric residency programs already do that. Pod interns function on internal medicine, infectious disease, general surgery, vascular, plastics, etc and are given the same responsibilities as their MD/DO counterparts. It is for that reason that pods are now more easily able to get admitting privileges at hospitals.

Again, my question was: "What is true parity". PADPM brought up some excellent points. In the end, if DPM's received true parity, what would be the point of a DPM degree? You might as well make it an MD/DO specialty.

I did not come to this site to argue, fence, or volley with podiatry. However to address your: "You want to make me feel bad." I can not MAKE you feel bad. You can only make yourself feel bad. This is not about feelings rather about True Parity and or lack thereof. Yes many insurance companies, hospital staff's lump podiatry into the category of `physician' largely for convenience on behalf of the hospital - No. You do not have admitting privelages as a DPM as the H and Ps are podiatric H and Ps and an MD/DO will ultimately be responsible (maybe in a few states that is not the case but if I were a DPM I'd certainly want to know the laws and consequences for taking on responsibilties outside of my scope of practice you can frame this as an argument but this is a situation in flux and politically charged rather than based on academics). The same insurance companies also pay you less because you are DPM physicians and the same hospitals generally give you DPM physician status. You can counter these things till the cows come home and these shoddy arguements will not function as the central issue on this thread, True Parity, which means a global rather than isolated True Parity which would encompass ALL of podiatry in a world you will at some point come to acknowledge can exist with or without podaitry as evidenced by its elimination from some medicaid programs. Hence lack of income for DPM `physicans.' Neither you or I will ever know what is truly in the minds of other people. At best you can read what is written, chance upon some conversations but these are anectodal items not to be mistaken for the larger picture. If in all honesty you can say that you perform the same duties as a PGY-1 12-24 hour shifts (not exact quotes to trifle with) direct responsiibilities dealing with life and death medical conditions and you understand and can incorporate the components of a complete physical examination, admission to discharge montoring, I am misinformed. Last time I looked, there were all sorts of residencies for podiatrists with NO unfying duties other than learning how to peform foot surgery. IF surgery of the foot is, to you, the be all and end all to being a physician and that sets well in your mind. OK. It isn't for me and those forces who will ultimately decide upon the notion of True Parity. My suggestion for REAL stratified ACGME residencies will make for a component of attaining True Parity - a concept which seems elusive to many of the posters. You seem to fancy anectode, try this: Call an orthodeic surgery colleague and compare EOBs for the exact CPT and ICD codes, is there equal pay? Call a GP or IM and compare reimbursement for E and M codes. DPMs will not get reimburesed the same amount of money for the same E and M codes as MD/DO `specialists'. Are we clear on this? There is no equal pay for equal service rendered by DPMs. You can fact check this around the country - Please, check how much you will be reimbursed by medicare 99212 (DPMs rarely go to the 99213 but you can look these things up and compare reimbursements - hey you wanted facts? 0K, sorry but the numbers don't lie, close, but still money is money and if you do not believe these things, now, at some point you may. At the end of the day an MD or DO will get paid more for the same or similar service, you're kdding yourselves if you blindly say otherwise without checking this out). After you disover these items to be true, you've got to find these things out for yourselves, the effort alone will work wonders for your state of mind. Like I said, a recognized ACGME program is not the black box mystery of those things which are podiatry residencies. They are unstraified, confusing and unequal nationwide, let alone globally.

It has become abundantly clear that DPM students, residents and such can or will not be mindful of the notion: "I do not know what I do not know."

Thank all of you for your input, I did press a bit on a few issues, but refuse to argue point by point the nuances and flaws of your arguements. Some of them are patently false and there will be laws, rules and regulations along with courts, attornies and judges who will ultimately rule on these matters of True Parity. I came here to gather material. What I got was a sampling of `fragility' feeble arguments: "Do plumbers read carpentry books?" That's about as podiatric as it can get: Do ENTs read about Internal Medicine. Does the general contractor have a sense for what the other subcontractors are doing. "I have MD/DO relatives…." Please. "I work with tons of MD/DOs…" And get equal pay too, yeah, right. "I sit side by side with DOs," and know how they cogitate….sure you do. Mind reading and telpathy are part of the DPM curriculum, right?

In all this has been an …. I'd like to characterize it as interesting, but; it's been more frustrating. I held out a few suggestions to stir up some ideas as part of an investigation toward True Parity entering a world popluated by DPMs that BELIEVE is one in which is an integral part of medicine and medical specialties in the US. Some of you are in devout believers as noted by what you've posted and that I am far removed from your `realities' - That's OK. I know, very much about what I don't know and spend a large part of my time taking suggestions about things which might heighten my awareness. I haven't read any posts suggesting any studies or literature substantiating any of your assertions. No, to the contrary a flurry of, at best mediocre `arguements' begging refutation. How will that play out in courtrooms and such toward True Parity?

Hey, I gave it a shot, no one came back to theis thread on True Parity having followed my instructions to try viewing MD/DO sites rather returning to argue why they should not.

Listen: I do not think podiatry has evolved much in the last twenty years. Sure you can hob knob with MD/DOs and can chat it up about what terrific foot and ankle surgeons you are and that you are going to have great futures and all the doors will spring open and the world will accept the DPM as an equal member of the medical team and on and on……But as I started out these posts with a quote from PK Dick: ~Reality is what happens even after we stop believing in it~ Remains true. There was one response acknowledging that some of the things I'd posted were accurate - that glimmer of maturity/intellect was refreshing, until the collective podiatric mindset dug in their collective heels and spewed out the same know - it - all blather so many have heard, read and discarded for a long time. Am I old and out of touch? I don't think so. Am I in a position to take material gleaned from many sources, analyse those things and develop a cogent theory and make reccommendations based upon my observations? You betcha. Lotsa luck - I came here to help, not to argue. If True Parity was something desired, the posts on this board suggest that podiatry will circle the wagons. Maybe an opportunity will present itself again in your lifetimes when you've gotten a bit of maturity. If you wanted guidance, I did offer. Clearly you guys/gals already know it all - Yeah, lotsa luck.

I don't know what I don't know. I do know this: An unwilingness to disabuse notions of parity is not the path to parity.
 
I will categorically state that I DO receive the exact same reimbursement as any orthopedic surgeon or any other MD/DO in my state for billing the same CPT/ICD codes. That's not my opinion, that is a fact.

I have served on several insurance committee panels in my state on many different levels, and so has one of my partners. Additionally, I worked with an orthopedic group and was involved with the billing and am completely aware of the reimbursements for all involved and there IS no difference.

It may exist in some states, but there are many states where reimbursement is EXACTLY the same. And Medicare does NOT have separate fee schedules for MD's/DO's and DPM's. You are misinformed and you are passing along wrong information.

You are obviously a bitter person who is/was happy with your DPM degree and as a result ended up seeking out your MD degree. I have no idea where you ended up obtaining your MD degree, but I have a "hunch" it wasn't Harvard. And I have no idea what specialty you ended up practicing or WHY in the world if you are so unhappy with the DPM degree, you ended up on THIS site.

I would think that if I was that disenchanted with MY DPM degree and eventually obtained my MD degree, I would never look back and certainly wouldn't spend my time on a podiatric forum getting in a "pissing match" with students.
 
Last edited:
I did not come to this site to argue, fence, or volley with podiatry. However to address your: "You want to make me feel bad." I can not MAKE you feel bad. You can only make yourself feel bad. This is not about feelings rather about True Parity and or lack thereof. Yes many insurance companies, hospital staff's lump podiatry into the category of `physician' largely for convenience on behalf of the hospital - No. You do not have admitting privelages as a DPM as the H and Ps are podiatric H and Ps and an MD/DO will ultimately be responsible (maybe in a few states that is not the case but if I were a DPM I'd certainly want to know the laws and consequences for taking on responsibilties outside of my scope of practice you can frame this as an argument but this is a situation in flux and politically charged rather than based on academics). The same insurance companies also pay you less because you are DPM physicians and the same hospitals generally give you DPM physician status. You can counter these things till the cows come home and these shoddy arguements will not function as the central issue on this thread, True Parity, which means a global rather than isolated True Parity which would encompass ALL of podiatry in a world you will at some point come to acknowledge can exist with or without podaitry as evidenced by its elimination from some medicaid programs. Hence lack of income for DPM `physicans.' Neither you or I will ever know what is truly in the minds of other people. At best you can read what is written, chance upon some conversations but these are anectodal items not to be mistaken for the larger picture. If in all honesty you can say that you perform the same duties as a PGY-1 12-24 hour shifts (not exact quotes to trifle with) direct responsiibilities dealing with life and death medical conditions and you understand and can incorporate the components of a complete physical examination, admission to discharge montoring, I am misinformed. Last time I looked, there were all sorts of residencies for podiatrists with NO unfying duties other than learning how to peform foot surgery. IF surgery of the foot is, to you, the be all and end all to being a physician and that sets well in your mind. OK. It isn't for me and those forces who will ultimately decide upon the notion of True Parity. My suggestion for REAL stratified ACGME residencies will make for a component of attaining True Parity - a concept which seems elusive to many of the posters. You seem to fancy anectode, try this: Call an orthodeic surgery colleague and compare EOBs for the exact CPT and ICD codes, is there equal pay? Call a GP or IM and compare reimbursement for E and M codes. DPMs will not get reimburesed the same amount of money for the same E and M codes as MD/DO `specialists'. Are we clear on this? There is no equal pay for equal service rendered by DPMs. You can fact check this around the country - Please, check how much you will be reimbursed by medicare 99212 (DPMs rarely go to the 99213 but you can look these things up and compare reimbursements - hey you wanted facts? 0K, sorry but the numbers don't lie, close, but still money is money and if you do not believe these things, now, at some point you may. At the end of the day an MD or DO will get paid more for the same or similar service, you're kdding yourselves if you blindly say otherwise without checking this out). After you disover these items to be true, you've got to find these things out for yourselves, the effort alone will work wonders for your state of mind. Like I said, a recognized ACGME program is not the black box mystery of those things which are podiatry residencies. They are unstraified, confusing and unequal nationwide, let alone globally.

It has become abundantly clear that DPM students, residents and such can or will not be mindful of the notion: "I do not know what I do not know."

Thank all of you for your input, I did press a bit on a few issues, but refuse to argue point by point the nuances and flaws of your arguements. Some of them are patently false and there will be laws, rules and regulations along with courts, attornies and judges who will ultimately rule on these matters of True Parity. I came here to gather material. What I got was a sampling of `fragility' feeble arguments: "Do plumbers read carpentry books?" That's about as podiatric as it can get: Do ENTs read about Internal Medicine. Does the general contractor have a sense for what the other subcontractors are doing. "I have MD/DO relatives…." Please. "I work with tons of MD/DOs…" And get equal pay too, yeah, right. "I sit side by side with DOs," and know how they cogitate….sure you do. Mind reading and telpathy are part of the DPM curriculum, right?

In all this has been an …. I'd like to characterize it as interesting, but; it's been more frustrating. I held out a few suggestions to stir up some ideas as part of an investigation toward True Parity entering a world popluated by DPMs that BELIEVE is one in which is an integral part of medicine and medical specialties in the US. Some of you are in devout believers as noted by what you've posted and that I am far removed from your `realities' - That's OK. I know, very much about what I don't know and spend a large part of my time taking suggestions about things which might heighten my awareness. I haven't read any posts suggesting any studies or literature substantiating any of your assertions. No, to the contrary a flurry of, at best mediocre `arguements' begging refutation. How will that play out in courtrooms and such toward True Parity?

Hey, I gave it a shot, no one came back to theis thread on True Parity having followed my instructions to try viewing MD/DO sites rather returning to argue why they should not.

Listen: I do not think podiatry has evolved much in the last twenty years. Sure you can hob knob with MD/DOs and can chat it up about what terrific foot and ankle surgeons you are and that you are going to have great futures and all the doors will spring open and the world will accept the DPM as an equal member of the medical team and on and on……But as I started out these posts with a quote from PK Dick: ~Reality is what happens even after we stop believing in it~ Remains true. There was one response acknowledging that some of the things I'd posted were accurate - that glimmer of maturity/intellect was refreshing, until the collective podiatric mindset dug in their collective heels and spewed out the same know - it - all blather so many have heard, read and discarded for a long time. Am I old and out of touch? I don't think so. Am I in a position to take material gleaned from many sources, analyse those things and develop a cogent theory and make reccommendations based upon my observations? You betcha. Lotsa luck - I came here to help, not to argue. If True Parity was something desired, the posts on this board suggest that podiatry will circle the wagons. Maybe an opportunity will present itself again in your lifetimes when you've gotten a bit of maturity. If you wanted guidance, I did offer. Clearly you guys/gals already know it all - Yeah, lotsa luck.

I don't know what I don't know. I do know this: An unwilingness to disabuse notions of parity is not the path to parity.

See, that's what I'm talking about. You babble on and on and within the incoherent rambling, you make a bunch of false statements. Again, we know our profession much better than you. Yes, I have admitting privileges and do my own H&P's. Yes, I'm reimbursed exactly as an MD is reimbursed. I HAVE CHECKED INTO IT! And whenever any of us state these absolute facts, you quickly dismiss it and continue on with your ramblings which gives you zero credibility. (My post and PADPM's post are perfect examples of fact).

That is my point. You are making all of these claims and ALL OF US, many of which are practicing podiatrists, are telling you that you are wrong. You can believe whatever you want to believe in the end. You obviously don't know that much about the field of podiatry. I, on the other hand, do.
 
I will categorically state that I DO receive the exact same reimbursement as any orthopedic surgeon or any other MD/DO in my state for billing the same CPT/ICD codes. That's not my opinion, that is a fact.

I have served on several insurance committee panels in my state on many different levels, and so has one of my partners. Additionally, I worked with an orthopedic group and was involved with the billing and am completely aware of the reimbursements for all involved and there IS no difference.

It may exist in some states, but there are many states where reimbursement is EXACTLY the same. And Medicare does NOT have separate fee schedules for MD's/DO's and DPM's. You are misinformed and you are passing along wrong information.

You are obviously a bitter person who is/was happy with your DPM degree and as a result ended up seeking out your MD degree. I have no idea where you ended up obtaining your MD degree, but I have a "hunch" it wasn't Harvard. And I have no idea what specialty you ended up practicing or WHY in the world if you are so unhappy with the DPM degree, you ended up on THIS site.

I would think that if I was that disenchanted with MY DPM degree and eventually obtained my MD degree, I would never look back and certainly wouldn't spend my time on a podiatric forum getting in a "pissing match" with students.

Nice.
 
See, that's what I'm talking about. You babble on and on and within the incoherent rambling, you make a bunch of false statements. Again, we know our profession much better than you. Yes, I have admitting privileges and do my own H&P's. Yes, I'm reimbursed exactly as an MD is reimbursed. I HAVE CHECKED INTO IT! And whenever any of us state these absolute facts, you quickly dismiss it and continue on with your ramblings which gives you zero credibility. (My post and PADPM's post are perfect examples of fact).

That is my point. You are making all of these claims and ALL OF US, many of which are practicing podiatrists, are telling you that you are wrong. You can believe whatever you want to believe in the end. You obviously don't know that much about the field of podiatry. I, on the other hand, do.


Im very happy that we see eye to eye .... this is what ive been saying from the start , and then we get called "fragile"???!! GTF outta here !
Jwill your the man !
 
I will categorically state that I DO receive the exact same reimbursement as any orthopedic surgeon or any other MD/DO in my state for billing the same CPT/ICD codes. That's not my opinion, that is a fact.

I have served on several insurance committee panels in my state on many different levels, and so has one of my partners. Additionally, I worked with an orthopedic group and was involved with the billing and am completely aware of the reimbursements for all involved and there IS no difference.

It may exist in some states, but there are many states where reimbursement is EXACTLY the same. And Medicare does NOT have separate fee schedules for MD's/DO's and DPM's. You are misinformed and you are passing along wrong information.

You are obviously a bitter person who is/was happy with your DPM degree and as a result ended up seeking out your MD degree. I have no idea where you ended up obtaining your MD degree, but I have a "hunch" it wasn't Harvard. And I have no idea what specialty you ended up practicing or WHY in the world if you are so unhappy with the DPM degree, you ended up on THIS site.

I would think that if I was that disenchanted with MY DPM degree and eventually obtained my MD degree, I would never look back and certainly wouldn't spend my time on a podiatric forum getting in a "pissing match" with students.

What is it about `gathering information' that you don't get?

But thank you for your information. I am enlightend by the comments and they will all fit nicely into my current project. Have a podiatric day. Bye.
 
Im very happy that we see eye to eye .... this is what ive been saying from the start , and then we get called "fragile"???!! GTF outta here !
Jwill your the man !

Thank you for your very podiatric post. Good luck in your career and thank you again for all of the information.
 
You do not have admitting privelages as a DPM as the H and Ps are podiatric H and Ps and an MD/DO will ultimately be responsible (maybe in a few states that is not the case but if I were a DPM I'd certainly want to know the laws and consequences for taking on responsibilties outside of my scope of practice you can frame this as an argument but this is a situation in flux and politically charged rather than based on academics).

As has been stated by PADPM and Jonwill, Podiatrists do have admitting privileges all over the country. This is the majority not the minority.

The same insurance companies also pay you less because you are DPM physicians and the same hospitals generally give you DPM physician status.

See PADPM's post on this matter.

There is no equal pay for equal service rendered by DPMs.

Again, see PADPM's post

If in all honesty you can say that you perform the same duties as a PGY-1 12-24 hour shifts (not exact quotes to trifle with) direct responsiibilities dealing with life and death medical conditions and you understand and can incorporate the components of a complete physical examination, admission to discharge montoring, I am misinformed. Last time I looked, there were all sorts of residencies for podiatrists with NO unfying duties other than learning how to peform foot surgery.

All of your "facts" are wrong. Podiatrists do in fact have the same duties as MD/DO and do rotate through many medical specialities (IM, EM, Gen surg, vasc surg, ortho surg, trauma, etc.). They can do a complete physical exam, admit, and discharge.

Yes, you are misinformed.

This is not an emotional post AT ALL. I am just stating the FACTS.

Have a nice DPM, MD day caddypod!
 
I will categorically state that I DO receive the exact same reimbursement as any orthopedic surgeon or any other MD/DO in my state for billing the same CPT/ICD codes. That's not my opinion, that is a fact.

Good for you.

I have served on several insurance committee panels in my state on many different levels, and so has one of my partners. Additionally, I worked with an orthopedic group and was involved with the billing and am completely aware of the reimbursements for all involved and there IS no difference.

Again good for you. I guess the billing was all done under your DPM npi…not the ortho group #.

It may exist in some states, but there are many states where reimbursement is EXACTLY the same. And Medicare does NOT have separate fee schedules for MD's/DO's and DPM's. You are misinformed and you are passing along wrong information.

If that is your belief. Knock youself out. I have different information.

You are obviously a bitter person who is/was happy with your DPM degree and as a result ended up seeking out your MD degree. I have no idea where you ended up obtaining your MD degree, but I have a "hunch" it wasn't Harvard. And I have no idea what specialty you ended up practicing or WHY in the world if you are so unhappy with the DPM degree, you ended up on THIS site.

This is material for a project I'm working on. Thanks for fulfilling a stereotype. Jolly good of you all to be so predictable.

I would think that if I was that disenchanchised with MY DPM degree and eventually obtained my MD degree, I would never look back and certainly wouldn't spend my time on a podiatric forum getting in a "pissing match" with students.

Thank you for analyzing my personal history, my dissatisfaction with my DPM and where I got my MD from. Nice, the way you've taken what I've written, hardly exemplary of `bitter' but that is, the podiatric way, isn't it? Oh yeah, before I forget, it's a nice touch that I've been posting here and at other sites out of some `happiness' issues. Try this conclusion you folks have given me: If the podiatrist doesn't understand why someone is asking questions and poking around they -DPMs- draw conclusion based upon speculation. What does that reflect? I said that I came here to gather information and get some feedback for a project. It's sort of baffling why you and yours conclude, package and dismiss someone interested in the topiic TRUE PARITY. You folks are very very defensive.

Pissing match. The more you write the more narrow minded and uncooperative and belligerent you sound. Do you think that the larger audience who'll be reading these things will read your posts and mine and draw the same or similar conclusions? Then again, by not knowing who, what or why I come here yet concluding that it must be because of some personal issue(s) goes to sound cognitive processes…..right?

I've said it a few times, but I'll say it again: I am here to gather information for a project regarding the notion of TRUE PARITY. So far, as I've said I don't see it among these posts on the thread titled True Parity. I will tell you that there will people who will read what I write who will make decisions regarding these things. Is that a pissing contest? So far I've stirred the pot a bit. I'm not finished yet, this is a small sample, but I get the general drift.

I suppose the next move is to ban me from this board. Very podiatric and if the last few posts are any indication as to podiatric thinking - it fits.

…..oh yeah, when you worked for the orthopedic group how often did you have to go fetch coffee or wax their cars?
 
Im very happy that we see eye to eye .... this is what ive been saying from the start , and then we get called "fragile"???!! GTF outta here !
Jwill your the man !

….oh the delicate one, back for a `see I told you so' - Good for you. I guess those water wings helped. You folks can pat each other on the back parsing congratulatory high-fives - but in the end of the True Parity issue - I think you've pretty much shown that level of preparedness I've been looking for. It ain't there.

GTF outta here - Only when you ban me. Then you will show your true podiatric colors and mindset, per Jack Nicholson in A FEW GOOD MEN: "You can't handle the truth!"

So float around in your little podiatric realm and when you go out looking to earn a living paying back your student loans you might reread some of these things and say: "I (as in you) was right!" And indeed you are, tons of luck, because that's what it's going to take, just pure dumb luck-
 
…..oh yeah, when you worked for the orthopedic group how often did you have to go fetch coffee or wax their cars?

Go ahead genius, make an attempt at slinging an insult at me. But I can assure you that I'm MUCH more successful at my chosen profession than you have been in your first choice OR your second choice, with your foreign school MD degree.

But apparently reading comprehension isn't your strong point. Because if you read my post correctly, I clearly wrote that I worked "with" an orthopedic group and not "for" an orthopedic group.

Just because you're a loser and obviously have been someone's "lacky", doesn't mean that applies to all of us.

In my first post to you I attempted to be diplomatic, and actually agreed that there is no true parity and that is not going to happen anytime soon. I also recommended that with your experience, maybe, just maybe you would be able to contribute to this forum in a positive, constructive way....but I was obviously wrong.

Now why don't you do something REALLY constructive like renewing your prescription for Paxil, lithium, or whatever pscyh meds you are obviously taking.
 
As has been stated by PADPM and Jonwill, Podiatrists do have admitting privileges all over the country. This is the majority not the minority.



See PADPM's post on this matter.



Again, see PADPM's post



All of your "facts" are wrong. Podiatrists do in fact have the same duties as MD/DO and do rotate through many medical specialities (IM, EM, Gen surg, vasc surg, ortho surg, trauma, etc.). They can do a complete physical exam, admit, and discharge.

Yes, you are misinformed.

If you say so. I guess since you have done these things you are an expert and your licensure reflects that level of knowledge and skill. Right? This thread is about True Parity and/or lack thereof.


This is not an emotional post AT ALL. I am just stating the FACTS.


Me too. You can state many many things with facts. How about state laws and scopes of practice. I cannot possibly know all of the state laws and scopes of practice acts, but last time I looked there were no states that allowed podiatrists to manage patients outside of their scopes of practice.

Have a nice DPM, MD day caddypod!

Thank you soo much. You have given me so much material that I will be having a jolly old time quoting all of the assertions y'all have made.

If you visited the bad people site of negativists and naysayers you'd know the what and why I am here and my involvement in the issue of True Parity.

Would sombody please ban me from this page already - If you have something to say, step up and be grown up you have my e mail address and know where to find me - even a book of faces page Caddy Pod - Figure this out, it isn't too difficult….I do this sort of stuff for a living. It's the `This stuff' part that at some point a little light will go off in your head….then again, you put a lot of things in writing, and the expression that sometimes things we've written have a way of coming back to you ….well, go figure. Thank you for supplying me with information, a gift that keeps on giving. Laugh that one off on your way to the checkbook to pay down your student loans or waiting for a patient to show up….
 
Go ahead genius, make an attempt at slinging an insult at me. But I can assure you that I'm MUCH more successful at my chosen profession than you have been in your first choice OR your second choice, with your foreign school MD degree.

Wow! You've concluded that I have a foreign MD degree. Big whoops on that one genius. What did you summon the ghost of Einstien and hire a team of monkeys for that one? You figure out that there's a diffence between slinging an insult and `attempting' to sling? Brilliant, truly a remarkable discovery. Actually I've done well enough in my chosen profession and probably have a lot more fun than you - but that has no bearing. It doesn't take much to ruffle your feathers.

But apparently reading comprehension isn't your strong point. Because if you read my post correctly, I clearly wrote that I worked "with" an orthopedic group and not "for" an orthopedic group.

Oh, so WITH makes for a most salient rebuttal - My my I am so illiterate, I really have to take a remedial reading course because it has so much to do with True Parity.

J
ust because you're a loser and obviously have been someone's "lacky", doesn't mean that applies to all of us.

I admit I've been a lacky. That worked for me well. I learned the ropes of my chosen career that way.

In my first post to you I attempted to be diplomatic, and actually agreed that there is no true parity and that is not going to happen anytime soon. I also recommended that with your experience, maybe, just maybe you would be able to contribute to this forum in a positive, constructive way....but I was obviously wrong.

Likewise, did anyone care to read what I suggested? Nope - just came back all hotwired and defensive. I'm bad.

Now why don't you do something REALLY constructive like renewing your prescription for Paxil, lithium, or whatever pscyh meds you are obviously taking.

Oh so you can diagnose and treat psychiaric anomalies? - Nothing like reducing a dialogue into person affronteries regarding mental health to lend credibility to the issue of True Parity. Ya' think?

Please show them all how podiatric thinking works and ban me so I can use the material for my current project.
 
Oh so you can diagnose and treat psychiaric anomalies? - Nothing like reducing a dialogue into person affronteries regarding mental health to lend credibility to the issue of True Parity. Ya' think?

Please show them all how podiatric thinking works and ban me so I can use the material for my current project.


Enough with the "podiatric thinking" BS. Who is the person who STARTED slinging the insults??? I corrected YOUR error and misinformation regarding two levels of reimbursements, and instead of being humble and thanking me for the correction, YOU reduced it to asking me if I got coffee for the orthopedic group or washed their cars.

Is that YOUR combined "allopathic/podiatric" thinking??? Is that how it works?

So get off your high foreign medical school degree horse. With your foreign MD degree you are no more respected than any DPM, believe me.

Do you think that your "colleagues" believe you've achieved "parity" when they know you didn't have what it takes to earn your MD degree in the U.S.??

You keep waiting for someone to ban you so you can have more ammunition against this idea of "podiatric thinking" that you have in your feeble mind (but doesn't exist). So, I'm proposing that if you really want to be banned, why don't you self impose the ban on yourself. I'm confident that you won't be missed.

And I have to admire you....you're the first person I EVER met who admitted to being a "lacky" and seems to be proud of that title. Wow, something truly worthy...it's that something you've aspired for your entire life?

Isn't it time to go to a dental, optometric or chiropractic forum to remind them all that they're not "real" doctors?
 
…..oh yeah, when you worked for the orthopedic group how often did you have to go fetch coffee or wax their cars?

If anything hoax, the orthos were probably waxing PADPMs R8, which certainly dispels most, if not all points, about financial reimbursement if you ask me and the closest Audi dealer.

I think some of your points are true, and I think most of the points SDN attendings have to say. But I think you have to understand that like any profession, there is a Bell Curve. Podiatry Bell Curve (financial bell curve) may shift slightly on the left more than another MD or DO profession which has made you and your group dissatisfied with the profession, however a majority of this bell curve sits in an area that is the same as dentists, Internal Meds, maybe some orthos and etc.

But Podiatry isn't perfect, and I am glad your fighting to 'tie up' the last few bit of strings to make Podiatry a better profession for future and current pods and sutdents. Just don't come of tooo strong 🙂
 
Enough with the "podiatric thinking" BS. Who is the person who STARTED slinging the insults??? I corrected YOUR error and misinformation regarding two levels of reimbursements, and instead of being humble and thanking me for the correction, YOU reduced it to asking me if I got coffee for the orthopedic group or washed their cars.

Come on, you gotta admit that was funny? Really?

Is that YOUR combined "allopathic/podiatric" thinking??? Is that how it works?

Actually it's neither. I work in the entertainment industry.

So get off your high foreign medical school degree horse. With your foreign MD degree you are no more respected than any DPM, believe me.

I really don't have much use for respect. I'm largely anonymous and my work has been around for a long time. I've done okay, so the whole degree thing is sort of moot. By coming here and examining the True Parity arguments is a quick study in conflict, you know the impetus which drives a story - irresistble force vs. Immovable object. I just so happen to have those degrees and the topic is a good one. In full disclosure I am being paid for this, so feel free to `sling' as much of skepticism, nastiness and/or goofiness as you want.

Do you think that your "colleagues" believe you've achieved "parity" when they know you didn't have what it takes to earn your MD degree in the U.S.??

Assuming that you chose to suggest I got an offshore medical degree, I know that can be dicey. It's like that for DOs who do MD programs - but at the end of the day I do have the M D degree. As I mentioned the only use for it for me has been the abundance of topics and issues I can explore - other than that it's like tits on a bull. Of course the ability to walk through walls, travel at the speed of light and leap tall buildings in a single bound….I can do some nifty procedures and diagnose a lot of maladies and have a good sense of what I don't know. Otherwise, my imagination has no bounds.

You keep waiting for someone to ban you so you can have more ammunition against this idea of "podiatric thinking" that you have in your feeble mind (but doesn't exist). So, I'm proposing that if you really want to be banned, why don't you self impose the ban on yourself. I'm confident that you won't be missed.

Feeble mind. Yeah, that's got a nice touch, but it doesn't fit the parameters in which this True Parity thread is framed vis-a-vis my posts when you thought I had some skin in the game other than a story to tell. I'm confident that you're confident that I won't be missed - It all works out for the best, at least for me. I've gotten a few concepts floated and a few ideas to work with.

Isn't it time to go to a dental, optometric or chiropractic forum to remind them all that they're not "real" doctors?

I am real. The whole concept of reality is that it is something which exists with or without you or me. I've already shared with you what I do, and why I do it. The concept at this time is True Parity.

Chiropractors, Optometrists and Dentists are a thought. I've integrated some of their expoits into some projects a few years back. But the True Parity thing came up, and I'm using it…..

Look I could be all smarmy and look down my nose and say all sorts of MD vs DPM things that go far beyond the scope of this thread - But that stuff would just go beyond the point of being remotely entertaining. If you want to do podiatry and you think you've been used/manipulated by me - eh? I ended up with some solid conflict and decent dialogue.
 
i am real. The whole concept of reality is that it is something which exists with or without you or me. I've already shared with you what i do, and why i do it. The concept at this time is true parity.

Chiropractors, optometrists and dentists are a thought. I've integrated some of their expoits into some projects a few years back. But the true parity thing came up, and i'm using it…..

Look i could be all smarmy and look down my nose and say all sorts of md vs dpm things that go far beyond the scope of this thread - but that stuff would just go beyond the point of being remotely entertaining. If you want to do podiatry and you think you've been used/manipulated by me - eh? I ended up with some solid conflict and decent dialogue.


wtf???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top