- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
- Messages
- 7,132
- Reaction score
- 1,250
Refer to this very interesting article:
Medscape: Medscape Access
This is a report of the ACCUMULATED wealth of physicians by specialty with direct correlating data of their actual income. The 2 things are NOT the same. This is important because accumulation of resources IS wealth and not the commonly misunderstood annual income figure.
I say this because when you are looking at medical employment, you can make a better financial situation often by taking a job that has lower pay. The gestalt has to be evaluated and not the raw number.
I take pride in the fact that 57% of Pathologists self-identify as a SAVER. This is the highest of any physician type.
Even though our median income is only so so compared to other specialists, we are as a group among the top subspecs saving to a net worth of 2-5 million. This is awesome!
Pathology is among the quicker subspecs to pay off student loans and among the least likely to self identify as a big consumer spender.
The top specialty in medicine continues to be Derm, with an obscene % accumulating not only 2-5,000,000 but a sizable % accumulating OVER 5,000,000 aka real $. I called this back in the 90s due to the retail angle and the ability to go outside insurance networks with minimal friction combined with high service demands.
Plastics even though they make a TON are garbage savers, living the stereotype of the doc who in their 30s is still renting a high priced urban condo and driving a depreciating Maserati while they troll Tinder.
The poorest appears to be Nephrologists, Internal Med and Allergy displacing what is usually thought of as territory for Peds, although Peds is still not in great shape. Surprisingly Pysch is still weak in savings even though their pay has skyrocketed...perhaps delayed gratification resulting in splurge consumerism.
Toggle between this data set and the income by specialty data set as they are the same study population.
Medscape: Medscape Access
This is a report of the ACCUMULATED wealth of physicians by specialty with direct correlating data of their actual income. The 2 things are NOT the same. This is important because accumulation of resources IS wealth and not the commonly misunderstood annual income figure.
I say this because when you are looking at medical employment, you can make a better financial situation often by taking a job that has lower pay. The gestalt has to be evaluated and not the raw number.
I take pride in the fact that 57% of Pathologists self-identify as a SAVER. This is the highest of any physician type.
Even though our median income is only so so compared to other specialists, we are as a group among the top subspecs saving to a net worth of 2-5 million. This is awesome!
Pathology is among the quicker subspecs to pay off student loans and among the least likely to self identify as a big consumer spender.
The top specialty in medicine continues to be Derm, with an obscene % accumulating not only 2-5,000,000 but a sizable % accumulating OVER 5,000,000 aka real $. I called this back in the 90s due to the retail angle and the ability to go outside insurance networks with minimal friction combined with high service demands.
Plastics even though they make a TON are garbage savers, living the stereotype of the doc who in their 30s is still renting a high priced urban condo and driving a depreciating Maserati while they troll Tinder.
The poorest appears to be Nephrologists, Internal Med and Allergy displacing what is usually thought of as territory for Peds, although Peds is still not in great shape. Surprisingly Pysch is still weak in savings even though their pay has skyrocketed...perhaps delayed gratification resulting in splurge consumerism.
Toggle between this data set and the income by specialty data set as they are the same study population.