Thank you, but I'll pass. Maybe I'm old fashioned but I think that nobody should bang my wife but me.
I dont want admin blaming me for this derailment but I think current evolutionary theory would disagree with you strongly. Trust me, as Im digging into this further and am reading more of the science literature on the subject am as I disturbed as you but..
Central theory: It appears primates, especially those with large for body size external testes (ratio of testicular volume to average body surface area), evolved to compete on a cellular and molecular level and NOT on a macro-organism level as common culture suggests.
Evidence 1: split ejaculate chemical analysis shows homo sapiens have multi-phase chemical warfare process that aids their own sperm while harming other male sperm
Evidence 2: large external testes in humans correspond to very high spermatozoa counts and these sperm have specialized roles specifically intended to defeat other male sperm.
Evidence 3: Higher sperm counts correspond with greater success of fertilization and higher sperm counts roughly correlate with higher testosterone levels, testosterone levels correlate with higher male "status"
Evidence 4: Primate female vocalizations are intended to call other healthy males to a mating female. In analysis of female vocalizations of both humans and baboons, the pitch, sound complexity, decibel level convey information to surrounding males about her current partner's male status and whether other males should attempt approach after he is done. More complex, louder vocalization communicates a more dominant male is currently mating with her. Given the incredible evolutionary cost of these as they would call ground dwelling predators as well who would predate on the mating couple, they must serve a very powerful evolutionary purpose.
Evidence 5: Women have a much higher chance of fertilization by a random dominant male than their actual spouse. This is due to the fact women have a "dark mating strategy" which employs one male a resource gatherer as a "spouse" and other more dominant males as clandestine mating partners. Given dark mating strategies are so culturally taboo as a social evolution to maintain community cohesion and reduce intraspecies homocide, they operate at a very deep subconscious levels in human females.
Evidence 6: The fact that homosexuality is so prevalent and is such a massive headache for natural selection theorists to explain, it is likely many males in human society exist solely for a "helper role" in the community, either resource gathering, child rearing, tribal protection or construction and not for mating purposes. This is a hard pill I think for many to swallow. To wrap this entire disturbing intellectual framework of what humans really are all about together for you SDN readers, the most common viewed type of porn looked at by men is gang bangs and now ****old type porn is no2. Psychologists feel there is a deep subconscious element, a Jungian archetype shadow-self almost, at play in men who are coming to grips with female dark mating strategy by viewing said porn. Yah this is really really messed up I agree especially coming from a Judeo-Christian (perhaps even any theistic social framework Hinduism included?) socio-cultural paradigm. I havent finished Peterson's Maps of Meaning so I cant really comment any further on the socio-religious tie in.
Overall this would strongly indicate, human females evolved to have multi-partner sex especially around ovulation and perhaps most bizarrely with strangers with more masculine dominant traits to incite more rigorous sperm competition at a cellular level. You could theorize than in the 250,000 years since homo sapiens experienced rapid brain growth and developed advanced speech capabilities, only the last 3,000 to 4,000 years have social constructs made this taboo so you are actually really "new school" in your thinking. True "old school" would be just wandering around with your eyes and ears open looking for the opportunity to reproduce after work.