- Joined
- Oct 9, 2004
- Messages
- 194
- Reaction score
- 3
Anyone?
Thanks Irlandesa. The truth is that both programs are very appealing. I suppose that for fellowships, Mayo might be a little better. But Tufts is in Boston..irlandesa said:I assume you are talking about Tufts-NEMC? I'm soon to be a Tufts grad, but from what I hear, Mayo has the better national reputation. I have a friend who did his IM residency at Mayo and really liked it; he's now doing a GI fellowship at Lahey Clinic (another Tufts affiliate). However, if you like cities better than semi-rural areas, Tufts-NEMC might be better, and has excellent faculty as well. It really depends on what your preferences are; but I don't think you can go wrong with either institution.
june015b said:Both programs are about the same. Mayo clinic is like Cliveland Clinic and it's mainly subspeciality-driven. CCF and Mayo are not popular among U.S. medical Graduates for genenral medicine residency training. You can not go wrong by going to either places for training. You should factor in the geographical location (rural vs. city like Boston (it's cold there, too)). Three years or more are not short time.
dennis said:Hi there, I wonder why is it that the US grads do not like to do IM residency in Mayo and Cleveland. After all, these are top hospitals and definitely have good fellowship placement. Please explain, I am confused.
Thank you very much June
dennis said:Hi there, I wonder why is it that the US grads do not like to do IM residency in Mayo and Cleveland. After all, these are top hospitals and definitely have good fellowship placement. Please explain, I am confused.
Thank you very much June
Art Vandelay said:I think Mayo places much more emphasis on their IM program. It sounds like a very resident friendly program w/ a huge emphasis on education and research. Their main problem might be getting people to come to Rochester over the other big city programs.