- Joined
- May 21, 2006
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
I am from California and am moving to attend ASDOH in July and I have been having these conversations with my girlfriend about state tuition subsidization and whether it is an actual investment to the tax payers. My take on it is that through friends currently attending UC dental schools and med schools is that there tuition is so cheap compared to their return from their salaries once they graduate that instead of providing access to the tax payers that helped pay their tuition they are able to pay for their luxuries.
As a californian who's interest is from paying taxes is that it appears these subsidizations don't lower the fees or increase the access to care to which these subsidizations suggest. I was also wondering how many people attend these schools and then actually stay in the state which payed for a large portion of their education.
As a Californian tax payer I would like people who receive such subsidization to commit atleast a year of service in a community clinic or to an access to care provider. If this is not the path people want to take then pay a higher tuition or apply for an academic scholarship or join some program that will lower their costs.
Just wanted to see what people thought
As a californian who's interest is from paying taxes is that it appears these subsidizations don't lower the fees or increase the access to care to which these subsidizations suggest. I was also wondering how many people attend these schools and then actually stay in the state which payed for a large portion of their education.
As a Californian tax payer I would like people who receive such subsidization to commit atleast a year of service in a community clinic or to an access to care provider. If this is not the path people want to take then pay a higher tuition or apply for an academic scholarship or join some program that will lower their costs.
Just wanted to see what people thought