Hi,
Wondering if anyone could help shed light on experience/impression of the UCLA program. Thank you.
SF
Wondering if anyone could help shed light on experience/impression of the UCLA program. Thank you.
SF
Stanford Fencer said:Hi,
Wondering if anyone could help shed light on experience/impression of the UCLA program. Thank you.
SF
gary_ruska said:Gary Ruksa here on this Fabuloso Monday...
UCLA's program is considered to be *the* country club program. No/little trauma, mostly dentoalveolar and implants. The faculty there are incredibly nice (Aghloo, Felsenfeld, Freymuller, etc.) and excellent teachers. A great program for those who have families.
Downside: No trauma or cosmetics. Limited orthognathic/TMJ experience at Kaiser.
drhobie7 said:I agree with GR. Faculty are awesome. Really great people. I think UCLA is a good balance with an emphasis on the bread and butter. They do a lot of implants. Orthognathics is mostly at Kaiser. Trauma is at Harbor hospital (county hospital in Long Beach). UCLA is a little short of the crazy rednecks that supply all those nasty infections and fractures you get in the dirty south, but every now and then one of those drunk cowboys wanders into Westwood.
S Files said:Interesting...i thought with Henry Kawamoto being the man of the craniofacial clinic and all, the omfs program would be more involved there.
gary_ruska said:Kawamoto is a PRS, not an OMFS.
InMyCrossHairs said:What other programs are "Country Club"? 9-5 sounds good to me.
InMyCrossHairs said:What other programs are "Country Club"? 9-5 sounds good to me.
Copious said:All this talk of UCLA being a 9-5 country club, makes you wonder why the hell they went to all 6 year????
unlvdmd said:Regardless, I am sure it is competitive as hell to get in there considering its southern cali alone. (not to mention the cush lifestyle)
Maybe I'm wrong? What are their average stats? Willing to bet pretty damn high.
unlvdmd said:Regardless, I am sure it is competitive as hell to get in there considering its southern cali alone. (not to mention the cush lifestyle)
Maybe I'm wrong? What are their average stats? Willing to bet pretty damn high.
drhobie7 said:Not sure what the average stats are, but they're definitely high. I think it's rare for someone with under a 95 to get in. One of the two who matched last year had a 99 and was a complete stud.
Copious said:You know its funny how after the boards went to computer there were more 99's than ever before.
What you say may be true, however, half of the 99's in my class were from the written.
UCLA is tough to get into. Probably because of location and getting the MD. However, it's not a strong program. You just don't do that much. I know because I know everything about everything.
That is ridiculous. 7 99's!!!
I went to UCLA and we didnt have 1 99 in our class (paper test taken) and i garuntee that if the exam was given to us in computer format there would have been 6-9 99's.
No one has really looked at this issue and i think that it needs to be addressed. People who are applying to specialties with scores based on the paper version are at an unfair position becuz their scores are low compared to the inflated computer scores of younger people who took the computer version.
Let the flaming begin
Do OMS´s from UCLA get attending positions at other, stronger, hospitals, where there are lots of trauma, craniofacial etc? Or do they all go into private practice?