UCSF (IS)
pros:
cons:
UOP
pros:
cons:
I really liked the environment and supportive community of UOP when I went in for an interview, I was very much drawn to the vibe there. The faculty was truly caring and so compassionate, whereas the people I met at UCSF were more stoic and less friendly. UCSF kept emphasizing their research/residency match rates, which I don't care about since I don't want to do research or specialize. I'm not sure whether the UOP people were acting it up during interview days, but I was much more drawn to the personalities and community of UOP.
However, it is difficult to come to terms with the $110k price tag difference. Do you guys think that the 3 year program and perks of UOP would make it worth $110k more out of pocket? Or is UCSF the no-brainer choice, and I should be able to become just as clinically strong at both schools?
I know this has been posted before, but in the other posts, the main concern was student loans. And while in-state tuition is amazing, my family will is helping me pay for my dental school education (in its entirety, I'm pretty sure) so loans/interest is not a concern, just the cost at face value.
Any thoughts are welcome, I'm incredibly torn right now -- thank you!
pros:
- smaller class size
- safer living area, next to golden gate park
- P/NP
cons:
- I hear a lot of horror stories about how difficult it is to get more complex cases given that UCSF has all the specialty residency programs
- most UCSF students I know had to go to GP residency programs after because they did not feel ready to practice upon graduation (1 more year of not earning a full dentist salary...)
- many private dentists I know are reluctant to hire fresh UCSF grads
UOP
pros:
- next to BART station, I can visit family/friends way more easily
- more faculty support
- warmer "community" among students ("Dugoni family")
- most UOP students I know graduate ready and able to work, fewer feel the need for residency programs
- many dentists I have talked to are more willing to hire fresh UOP grads, and they have a strong alumni network so it may be easier to find work upon graduation
- 3 year program
cons:
- more dangerous area
- obviously, much higher price point: UOP will cost about $110k more than UCSF, with living costs accounted for
I really liked the environment and supportive community of UOP when I went in for an interview, I was very much drawn to the vibe there. The faculty was truly caring and so compassionate, whereas the people I met at UCSF were more stoic and less friendly. UCSF kept emphasizing their research/residency match rates, which I don't care about since I don't want to do research or specialize. I'm not sure whether the UOP people were acting it up during interview days, but I was much more drawn to the personalities and community of UOP.
However, it is difficult to come to terms with the $110k price tag difference. Do you guys think that the 3 year program and perks of UOP would make it worth $110k more out of pocket? Or is UCSF the no-brainer choice, and I should be able to become just as clinically strong at both schools?
I know this has been posted before, but in the other posts, the main concern was student loans. And while in-state tuition is amazing, my family will is helping me pay for my dental school education (in its entirety, I'm pretty sure) so loans/interest is not a concern, just the cost at face value.
Any thoughts are welcome, I'm incredibly torn right now -- thank you!