Ucv

jakstat33

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Feb 6, 2004
265
0
42
SW
    my study partner and i will begin going through the ucv series. what is the best/most efficient way to go through these books? how did you tackle the series? we'd prefer active learning, as opposed to just reciting the text out loud to each other
     

    Idiopathic

    Newly Minted
    15+ Year Member
    Gold Member
    Apr 21, 2003
    8,362
    18
    Here
    1. Attending Physician
      We do something like this: present the 'case' without giving away the Dx. Plot a differential. Reason through what labs you would want and what you would expect. After you run through this scenario, look at any lab values and the diagnosis. After you get the Dx, list any 'pearls' you can think of (dark red urine in McArdle's disease) and then correlate them with the UCV pearls.

      The idea is just to be able to work your way through a case given the stem ("It burns when I pee"), some lab work, pertinent history, and a nugget or two. You may not learn a whole lot new, but it can really help your clinical reasoning.
       

      coop528

      Member
      7+ Year Member
      15+ Year Member
      Mar 20, 2004
      46
      0
        Why are the UCV's not highly regarded? I know that they are not similar in style to the Step 1 questions, but it seems to me that you still learn the important material along with learning how to work through a real clinical situation.....the real reason we are learning all of this stuff.

        How long does it take to get through each case? Would it be worth it to buy some used books for cheap and work them into the schedule I have already made.....maybe a handful of cases per day pertinent to the material I read for that day???
         

        Kalel

        Membership Revoked
        Removed
        15+ Year Member
        Feb 1, 2004
        792
        3
        Metropolis
          here is my response in a PM to the OP:
          "If you read this thread, you will see that I'm not particularly fond of the UCV series. I had it, but I didn't use it at all just because I found the series too cumbersome to read for studying purposes. If you do have a study partner who really wants to go over it with you, and you do what is reccomended in the forum (read cases out loud to each other, while the other one goes over diffeerential and treatment), I htink that it is good as a study break. The cost and size of the series makes Step Up: intro to bedside for step 1 a better clinical vignettes book IMO, and even then, I didn't use that book all that much either to tell the truth. A lot of step 1 is clinical vignettes, but within those vignettes are facts that you just have to memorize, so it just comes down to where you want to spend your time. Good luck!"
          http://forums.studentdoctor.net/sho...threadid=108020
           
          About the Ads

          jed2023

          Senior Member
          7+ Year Member
          15+ Year Member
          Nov 11, 2002
          132
          1
          New York
            The problem I see with the UCV series is that there is close to ZERO explanatory information for each case. At the bottom of each case, there is usually a discussion but it's minimal.

            The optimal format for case material like this, in my opinion, is patient presentation, questions about it, and then informative explanations delving into pathophys relating to the case. Otherwise, it isn't terribly productive. A few "whys" is worth more to me than a dozen "whats."
             
            This thread is more than 17 years old.

            Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

            1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
            2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
            3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
            4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
            5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
            6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
            7. This thread is locked.