Uh-Oh. another drug for the media to demonize...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

pharmaz88

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2003
Messages
317
Reaction score
0
So, blindness occurred in 42 people out of, hmmm, ...millions? Doesn't matter. Make it a headline! It makes for great infotainment !!

...and to think that I work in a predominately senior citizen-patronized store. I can't wait to deal with all the freaking out customers tomorrow. :rolleyes:

(note: boldfacing is mine.)


Possible blindness link to Viagra? FDA checking

Associated Press
May. 27, 2005 07:20 AM

WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines.

The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan.

This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use.

The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness , 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug.

"We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan.

The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels.

Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site.

Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry.

Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness.

Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG.

Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate.

Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year.

Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure.

The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems.

Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share.

Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects.

Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion.

Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors.

Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discoving side effects once drugs hit the market.

For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm.

Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states.

---

On the Web:

http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp

http://www.fda.gov

Members don't see this ad.
 
If I'm not mistaken, haven't more deaths been attributed to use of Viagra?
 
Somewhat related, but did everyone hear about ABLE labs recall of EVERY DRUG that they sell. We sent back maybe 40 bottles of generic drugs (many control III'S)... The FDA got them for "poor lab practices" or something like that... :confused:
 
Members don't see this ad :)
jdpharmd? said:
Somewhat related, but did everyone hear about ABLE labs recall of EVERY DRUG that they sell. We sent back maybe 40 bottles of generic drugs (many control III'S)... The FDA got them for "poor lab practices" or something like that... :confused:

Yeah, we got that at rite aid. the computer wouldnt let us fill a script for their HC suppoistory's. Luckly we dont carry that many able products, the biggest one was the HC supp and generic fioricet. We also had some lithium CR and pyridium. Im just glad we dont use their generic lortab becasue our customers would have had a supreme hissy fit

Also, has anyone else heard about medicaid in NY restricting sex offenders from getting viagra? As of now, they cant figure out a way just to prevent sex offenders from getting it so medicaid will not reimburse us for any patient getting viagra. Its a huge pain explaining that to them
 
if i'm not mistaken, can't the blindness be associated with other activities associated with the use of Viagra/Cialis/etc? :laugh:
 
b*rizzle said:
if i'm not mistaken, can't the blindness be associated with other activities associated with the use of Viagra/Cialis/etc? :laugh:

What was that you said? I heard those activities associated with Viagra can make you deaf and blind.
 
bananaface said:
This coming from someone whose custom user title reads "I beat the smart kids". :laugh:

Now, now, bananaface, be nice.

I believe b*rizzle meant that the blindness may be related to a primary condition the patient has, which has resulted in a secondary condition of erectile dysfunction. Yes, b*rizzle, that is my uneducated (pre-pharm) understanding also. There has not been enough proof to make a direct correlation. Public hysteria is ignited and fueled by the media.
 
well i guess now these oldbags would take to take back gardering,instead of just popping blue pills and trying to think they're 20 again with gra'ma
 
bananaface said:
This coming from someone whose custom user title reads "I beat the smart kids". :laugh:

'Tis a bit of a stretch, especially since her custom user title is a reference to Ralph Wiggum. :p

PharmDeb said:
Yes, b*rizzle, that is my uneducated (pre-pharm) understanding also.

Only a joke, friends, only a joke.
 
b*rizzle said:
Only a joke, friends, only a joke.

Oh...he he...guess it went over my head...I sure hope it's not important to interpret correctly when I read stuff in Pharmacy School! :smuggrin:
 
Top