Unconventional interview answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 907914
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Answer the question honestly and formally, but give your actual thoughts. I think so many premeds are just so terrified of getting anything wrong that they won't stick their neck out for anything - even their own opinion.

I remember in one interview, I was asked about a comment about compassion fatigue I made on my secondary. They asked if I thought it was avoidable. I thought for a minute and said "No, I don't think so." Not an optimistic answer, but it was what I genuinely thought. Turns out it was the answer they liked too
I love this. You know, in every school I interviewed at, I promised myself to be EXACTLY how I am in normal life (ok, I DEFINITELY do not dress this well in normal life, and I don't wear makeup, - but these are details... hahahha). Everyone asked me a lot of questions about my job in addiction treatment facility, about time in the Army (I even brought both up during MMI interview in Vermont), about working in psychiatric ward, and I was always very honest. I mean, I would make sure my language sounds professional and not use curse words (those will prior military service would understand what I mean), but otherwise I always said EXACTLY what I meant. I figured, If they do not like who I genuinely am, then I am probably not a good fit for this school, you know?
I do the same with dating.... probably why I am single... hahahah. But it did work out with every interview.
 
Lol yep. The phrase is “curse like a Sailor” for a reason. It took a lot of effort for me to not curse during my interviews.
Hahaha ... exactly ...” F*** my life “ is one of the common ones I use... I had to switch it to more appropriate versions, such as “that situation caused me s lot of anxiety and created some tension at the work place “.... Hahahaha
 
I love this. You know, in every school I interviewed at, I promised myself to be EXACTLY how I am in normal life (ok, I DEFINITELY do not dress this well in normal life, and I don't wear makeup, - but these are details... hahahha). Everyone asked me a lot of questions about my job in addiction treatment facility, about time in the Army (I even brought both up during MMI interview in Vermont), about working in psychiatric ward, and I was always very honest. I mean, I would make sure my language sounds professional and not use curse words (those will prior military service would understand what I mean), but otherwise I always said EXACTLY what I meant. I figured, If they do not like who I genuinely am, then I am probably not a good fit for this school, you know?
I do the same with dating.... probably why I am single... hahahah. But it did work out with every interview.
Yeah, exactly what I mean. Dating is a great analogy. Why would you want someone to like a fake version of you? And why would you want to be accepted to a school whose mission you really don't fit with? (Rhetorical, don't answer lol - I'm sure a lot of people wouldn't mind getting in)
 
Yeah, exactly what I mean. Dating is a great analogy. Why would you want someone to like a fake version of you? And why would you want to be accepted to a school whose mission you really don't fit with? (Rhetorical, don't answer lol - I'm sure a lot of people wouldn't mind getting in)

And often the interviewers are treating this like a first date... try to get to know this person and determine if you'd want them on your team during their clinical rotation and be forced to eat lunch with them every day for a month. In other words, in addition to having the academic horsepower to do well in med school, you want someone who is interesting to chat with, someone who is interested in things outside of medicine (no one wants to talk shop over lunch every day... ), and who has a an upbeat attitude.
 
on one of the interviews i was asked what my hobbies were... i said EATING... "Like, i am REALLY good at it". I said it with absolutely serious face too. The guy was laughing so hard, he actually stopped me, and wrote it down. He said he's been interviewing people for 20 years, and never heard this before, and he wanted to remember the moment . 🙂. I did not do this on purpose, i was just very honest. So, sometimes unconventional is good 🙂
Key word is sometimes. You got away with something risky in a high stakes interview. As I told my residents, " Just because you got away with something doesnt mean you did the right thing. It just means you got away with something." It wont work well in the majority of formal interview situations.
 
Key word is sometimes. You got away with something risky in a high stakes interview. As I told my residents, " Just because you got away with something doesnt mean you did the right thing. It just means you got away with something." It wont work well in the majority of formal interview situations.
Well, i was not trying to be smart, or funny. Food is really my hobby. That was a very informal interview as well. The whole day was structured in a very informal manner. My interviewer was wearing short sleeve orange plaid shirt, with light pants, and he was laughing with me the entire time, - he was saying jokes left and right. So, it was one of those very relaxed interviews. In other schools things were much more serious, and I read the room, or course. That school is focused on rural medicine, and is in a small town, and from the second I walked in there, i felt like they want to see us as "real people". They asked me about gardening, what i do for fun, etc, etc. Just a few questions out of an hour interview were actually connected to medicine directly. I felt very strongly that in that school they were trying to evaluate you as a person, to see if you would be a good fit personality wise, if it makes any sense. So, in that particular situation me being funny i think played in my favor.
 
I totally get your scenario and understand you read the room and made a decision. I hope it all worked out well for you. You didnt say, but from the tone of your post it appears it did. My point in a high stakes interview , you might read the room incorrectly. You haven't interviewed enough people yet. Some are nervous and like to laugh to relieve the stress. Others derive comfort from straight professional. If you guess wrong, and it is a guess, you are now scrambling to regain their confidence. Anyway, I'm glad things worked out. Good luck and best wiahes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M&L
I feel like there's a balance between being your true self and being appropriately professional/reserved—the middle road so to speak. Don't be afraid to be honest about your passions and experiences and flaws, but don't give a 100% unfiltered hot take. Don't dodge the question, but answer it truthfully while being mindful of presentation/wording.

I also agree that it's very possible to misread the room and your interviewer. I was at a top school interview and I felt like I had the MOST awkward/stilted interview ever, interviewer had an insane poker face, and when it ended, I was like "well, that's it. i blew it." Ended up accepted??? At another school I was accepted to, one of my interviewers was so kind and friendly but I later found out from a current student that apparently they were known for being really tough when it came to actually evaluating interviewees behind doors. And then there were interviews where I felt like I KILLED it and then I ended up waitlisted :shrug:

My point is that we're not always as good at reading the room as we think we are, and interviewers may act very nice/friendly/chill regardless of how you're actually doing, and therefore there's a false sense of security. That's why I think it's best to strive for that middle road, because you don't want to be a politician-esque robot giving out canned/safe answers, but you also don't want to weird out the interviewer in case they're not actually as chill as you think they are.
 
I feel like there's a balance between being your true self and being appropriately professional/reserved—the middle road so to speak. Don't be afraid to be honest about your passions and experiences and flaws, but don't give a 100% unfiltered hot take. Don't dodge the question, but answer it truthfully while being mindful of presentation/wording.

I also agree that it's very possible to misread the room and your interviewer. I was at a top school interview and I felt like I had the MOST awkward/stilted interview ever, interviewer had an insane poker face, and when it ended, I was like "well, that's it. i blew it." Ended up accepted??? At another school I was accepted to, one of my interviewers was so kind and friendly but I later found out from a current student that apparently they were known for being really tough when it came to actually evaluating interviewees behind doors. And then there were interviews where I felt like I KILLED it and then I ended up waitlisted :shrug:

My point is that we're not always as good at reading the room as we think we are, and interviewers may act very nice/friendly/chill regardless of how you're actually doing, and therefore there's a false sense of security. That's why I think it's best to strive for that middle road, because you don't want to be a politician-esque robot giving out canned/safe answers, but you also don't want to weird out the interviewer in case they're not actually as chill as you think they are.
So true...I felt like I bombed my interview, and I received an acceptance less than a week later.
 
I totally get your scenario and understand you read the room and made a decision. I hope it all worked out well for you. You didnt say, but from the tone of your post it appears it did. My point in a high stakes interview , you might read the room incorrectly. You haven't interviewed enough people yet. Some are nervous and like to laugh to relieve the stress. Others derive comfort from straight professional. If you guess wrong, and it is a guess, you are now scrambling to regain their confidence. Anyway, I'm glad things worked out. Good luck and best wiahes.
I completely understand your point .

I got accepted there .
 
At another school I was accepted to, one of my interviewers was so kind and friendly but I later found out from a current student that apparently they were known for being really tough when it came to actually evaluating interviewees behind doors.

I interviewed you!? Small world.😀
 
This
I interviewed you!? Small world.😀
This is something I am hoping not to have to cope with. Literally any ADCOM who spends more than 10 minutes on SDN will be able to read the first sentence of my PS and be like “This is MemeLord.”

I completely understand your point .

I got accepted there .
Congrats! Definitely some great advice in here on interview behavior (I know I am better at interviewing than I come off over internet). Good to know a little bit of humor got you where you needed to go!

Yeah, exactly what I mean. Dating is a great analogy. Why would you want someone to like a fake version of you? And why would you want to be accepted to a school whose mission you really don't fit with? (Rhetorical, don't answer lol - I'm sure a lot of people wouldn't mind getting in)
I understand not looking fake, aim for the genuinitudinous behavior.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
who is interested in things outside of medicine (no one wants to talk shop over lunch every day...
I have heard from a good chunk of friends and med students that the majority of their interviews were talking about the outlier things that had nothing to do with medicine - the hobbies, interests, etc. Does that tend to be the case?
 
  • Like
Reactions: M&L
I have heard from a good chunk of friends and med students that the majority of their interviews were talking about the outlier things that had nothing to do with medicine - the hobbies, interests, etc. Does that tend to be the case?

For me it does. I might ask one or two questions about medical experiences and future career goals but the rest of the time I'm assessing your communication skills, ability to self-assess, curiosity, maturity. I can do that talking about medicine but it is much more interesting to me to talk about research, travel experiences (even how you traveled to the interview if you haven't had other experiences), hobbies, stories in the news that raise ethical questions, and so on.
 
I mean I also had the opposite experience where I had interviewers tell me they were going to skip the questions about leadership, service, etc because obviously I have plenty of that. But I did have one interviewer who viewed military as paid employment and wanted to see more service, so I think it’s good to have an answer.

I did get into that school though, and they are known to be military friendly. They have the highest percentage of vets of any school except USUHS lol.
What.the.hell.
Military is the ultimate service! How is it paid employment?! I'm screaming!?
 
I can do that talking about medicine but it is much more interesting to me to talk about research, travel experiences (even how you traveled to the interview if you haven't had other experiences), hobbies, stories in the news that raise ethical questions, and so on.
I have an example scenario on this notion to make sure I am not overthinking what you are saying and overthinking how I respond:

"So what got you interested in your current research project(s) with osteoclasts?"

"Well, when going through the introductory biology classes I didn't get much exposure to bones or the musculoskeletal system. While as a matriculant *nervously chuckles because I am talking about myself as a future med student* I will have the lovely experience to partake in anatomy and physiology classes, I have unfortunately had scheduling conflicts in undergrad and so I found myself in a curious position wanting to learn more about a tissue type I didn't have much exposure to. When Dr. XXXX approached me about working in his lab to actually genetically modify these cells, I was ecstatic. After learning just how dynamic the bone tissue is, I wanted to stick with it so I could not only teach myself about a field I did not know much about prior but also to contribute to that very same field."

Is that too detailedof a response to the given question? If asked "What is one of your flaws?" It is definitely that I talk too much/provide more details than necessary lol

But, in general, is that how you as an interviewer like to see the conversations go?
 
What.the.hell.
Military is the ultimate service! How is it paid employment?! I'm screaming!?
Depends who you ask. You can do the same jobs in the military on the civilian side (I am a med lab tech both military and civilian, you can do private security forces in Afghanistan [think Blackwater] and so on). It is what it is, and I don't fault people for considering it a job and I don't fault people for placing all veterans up on this untouchable mantle of servitude. The latter is beneficial and the former is neutral. Either way, we do what we do in the military for different reasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M&L
If it sounds like the candidate is NOT answering the question, that could lead to a rejection. the above answer sounds like a non-answer.

The answer above would lead to a followup something along the lines of what the wise @LizzyM likes to ask: "how do you know that you will be able to serve people who don't look like you?"
A follow up to this- the only volunteering I have that is service to the underserved is my volunteer work at the nursing home I volunteer at- but that's also clinical. It fits all the things non clinical volunteering is supposed to do- service to the underserved, working with people who don't look or act like you, more altruism than the typical pre-med box checking, but is still also clinical. So. My advisor said it does kind of count as both, and that's why it's excellant that I do that.
 
What.the.hell.
Military is the ultimate service! How is it paid employment?! I'm screaming!?
@Matthew9Thirtyfive
well, military is sort of both. The fact of military service itself is a service, but specific positions are jobs. For example, I was E4 in the Army, - that is a service. Me working in supply , -thats a job.
But yeah, i am surprised that wanted more hours outside of military... weird....
 
A follow up to this- the only volunteering I have that is service to the underserved is my volunteer work at the nursing home I volunteer at- but that's also clinical. It fits all the things non clinical volunteering is supposed to do- service to the underserved, working with people who don't look or act like you, more altruism than the typical pre-med box checking, but is still also clinical. So. My advisor said it does kind of count as both, and that's why it's excellant that I do that.
I disagree that nursing home residents are underserved, unless this is a Medicare facility, and even then, it's clinical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M&L
Depends who you ask. You can do the same jobs in the military on the civilian side (I am a med lab tech both military and civilian, you can do private security forces in Afghanistan [think Blackwater] and so on). It is what it is, and I don't fault people for considering it a job and I don't fault people for placing all veterans up on this untouchable mantle of servitude. The latter is beneficial and the former is neutral. Either way, we do what we do in the military for different reasons.
yeah, exactly. This sort of says what i wanted to say but in different words.
 
I disagree that nursing home residents are underserved, unless this is a Medicare facility, and even then, it's clinical.
Is "Elderly" not inherently undeserved or underprivileged? On my employment at a urology clinic, I made sure to throw in the buzzwords of "helping our predominantly elderly population." Was that a bad idea?
 
Is "Elderly" not inherently undeserved or underprivileged? On my employment at a urology clinic, I made sure to throw in the buzzwords of "helping our predominantly elderly population." Was that a bad idea?

I don't understand why you would think that's bad.
 
I disagree that nursing home residents are underserved, unless this is a Medicare facility, and even then, it's clinical.
Wasn't it you who said that you have a soft spot for people volunteering in hospice/nursing home because it's service to the underserved?
 
Is "Elderly" not inherently undeserved or underprivileged? On my employment at a urology clinic, I made sure to throw in the buzzwords of "helping our predominantly elderly population." Was that a bad idea?
No. Dick Cheney is elderly, but definitely not underserved.

I consider them to be a clinical population, others don't, in which case it could be "service to others" which is still fine.
 
I don't consider volunteering in a nursing home to be automatically clinical. If the people are residents and you are playing the piano for a sing-along or calling bingo numbers, what's the difference between that and the same activity in a senior center or a church hall?

If you are working with nursing home patients as an assistant to a therapist who is working with a patient who is undergoing rehabilitation of some kind, I'd call that clinical but not some of the other stuff people do to help old folks who live in a institutional setting.

So, you could list it as "volunteer,non-clinical" and that would be fine. You'd need some other activity (paid or volunteer) to count as "clinical".
 
No. Dick Cheney is elderly, but definitely not underserved.

I consider them to be a clinical population, others don't, in which case it could be "service to others" which is still fine.
In situations where it seems like adcoms have varying opinions- I like to think of it as a middle ground- it's sort of clinical, sort of counts as service to others, if you have a long term commitment to it and plenty of hours, it can help patch up low non clinical volunteering, but you may still be asked about it at an interview. I like to think when there are varying adcom opinions, the given committee can have people in either category, so the " average" opinion is somewhere in the middle.
 
I don't consider volunteering in a nursing home to be automatically clinical. If the people are residents and you are playing the piano for a sing-along or calling bingo numbers, what's the difference between that and the same activity in a senior center or a church hall?

If you are working with nursing home patients as an assistant to a therapist who is working with a patient who is undergoing rehabilitation of some kind, I'd call that clinical but not some of the other stuff people do to help old folks who live in a institutional setting.

So, you could list it as "volunteer,non-clinical" and that would be fine. You'd need some other activity (paid or volunteer) to count as "clinical".
Because they are people in a compromised position, according to my pre health advisor. He said to list it as clinical. I also have a 1 year and half of work volunteering in a hospital, around 200 hrs, but for senior year I've been focused on the nursing home. ( applying this cycle). I also recall asking him if my nursing home experience is strictly clinical or not.
I really feel like wherever I list it, it's up to the committee to see it as they will- IDT that if I put in clinical and they see it as non clinical, that it would count against me. Some things are up to interpretation.
 
I have an example scenario on this notion to make sure I am not overthinking what you are saying and overthinking how I respond:

"So what got you interested in your current research project(s) with osteoclasts?"

Here's how I think it should go:

"Well, when going through the introductory biology classes I didn't get much exposure to bones or the musculoskeletal system. While as a matriculant *nervously chuckles because I am talking about myself as a future med student* I will have the lovely experience to partake in anatomy and physiology classes, I have unfortunately had scheduling conflicts in undergrad and so I found myself in a curious position wanting to learn more about a tissue type I didn't have much exposure to. When Dr. XXXX approached me about working in his lab to actually genetically modify these cells, I was ecstatic. After learning just how dynamic the bone tissue is, I wanted to stick with it so I could not only teach myself about a field I did not know much about prior but also to contribute to that very same field." It has been really exciting to learn new things in the lab and I'm excited to be able to contrbute to the field, too.


We don't care about what courses you did or didn't take, or what lovely classes you will partake (partake? who uses that word?) in med school or your scheduling conflicts. Cut to the chase.
 
Because they are people in a compromised position, according to my pre health advisor. He said to list it as clinical. I also have a 1 year and half of work volunteering in a hospital, around 200 hrs, but for senior year I've been focused on the nursing home. ( applying this cycle). I also recall asking him if my nursing home experience is strictly clinical or not.
I really feel like wherever I list it, it's up to the committee to see it as they will- IDT that if I put in clinical and they see it as non clinical, that it would count against me. Some things are up to interpretation.
Exactly, if you try to call this clinical and adcoms think that it is not, it will hurt you. It rarely hurts to call something non-clinical and have adcoms give you a pat on the back for working with the elderly (or the homeless, or orphans, etc).
 
Exactly, if you try to call this clinical and adcoms think that it is not, it will hurt you. It rarely hurts to call something non-clinical and have adcoms give you a pat on the back for working with the elderly (or the homeless, or orphans, etc).
But....do you really think it's non clinical? All my advisors have said it's clinical, and it seems that the general consensus here is it is? I mean I could put it in as non clinical, but it seems like most people think it's clinical , so the other way around seems to be where most people would have issue?
 
But....do you really think it's non clinical? All my advisors have said it's clinical, and it seems that the general consensus here is it is? I mean I could put it in as non clinical, but it seems like most people think it's clinical , so the other way around seems to be where most people would have issue?
What were you actually doing there in the nursing home?
 
What were you actually doing there in the nursing home?
Working in life enrichment activities- calling numbers for bingo, doing visitations in the elderly residents' rooms, playing trivia. The residents at this home are chronically sick, with physical health problems as well as dementia, and the games help support their cognitive sharpness and slow their memory decline. That's why it's not the same thing as as a senior center- these are patients who are cared for 24/7 by nurses/CNA's. It's a long term care facility with sick residents, not just old residents. Activities and life enrichment are a form of treatment for these people, that increases their quality of life. ( I'm arguing this bc it's literally the angle I'm going for in my PS, so I.is. stress.)
Edit: I really hope my work at the nursing home makes me app stand out/ ties it together/ is the main service thing that can make me look like a qualified applicant. it's why I'm being so persistent here. These debates are why I hate categorizing activities- plenty of things can serve multiple purposes to both you and your application, labelling it only goes so far, and anybody can think anything about what " category" it goes into. It seems even ADCOMS don't always agree.
 
Last edited:
Working in life enrichment activities- calling numbers for bingo, doing visitations in the elderly residents' rooms, playing trivia. The residents at this home are chronically sick, with physical health problems as well as dementia, and the games help support their cognitive sharpness and slow their memory decline. That's why it's not the same thing as as a senior center- these are patients who are cared for 24/7 by nurses/CNA's. It's a long term care facility with sick residents, not just old residents. Activities and life enrichment are a form of treatment for these people, that increases their quality of life. ( I'm arguing this bc it's literally the angle I'm going for in my PS, so I.is. stress.)
Edit: I'm really hope my work at the nursing home makes me app stand out/ ties it together/ is the main service thing that can make me look like a qualified applicant. it's why I'm being so persistent here. These debates are why I hate categorizing activities- plenty of things can serve multiple purposes to both you and your application, labelling it only goes so far, and anybody can think anything about what " category" it goes into. It seems even ADCOMS don't always agree.

That's not clinical that is just volunteering in general. I would take @LizzyM 's advice and not try to make that something it is not which could really screw you over when you are going up against people who are talking about procedures, doctor/patient interactions, and hospital environments.

I mean you can do whatever you want of course but even I don't see that as clinical volunteering.
 
Working in life enrichment activities- calling numbers for bingo, doing visitations in the elderly residents' rooms, playing trivia. The residents at this home are chronically sick, with physical health problems as well as dementia, and the games help support their cognitive sharpness and slow their memory decline. That's why it's not the same thing as as a senior center- these are patients who are cared for 24/7 by nurses/CNA's. It's a long term care facility with sick residents, not just old residents. Activities and life enrichment are a form of treatment for these people, that increases their quality of life. ( I'm arguing this bc it's literally the angle I'm going for in my PS, so I.is. stress.)
Edit: I really hope my work at the nursing home makes me app stand out/ ties it together/ is the main service thing that can make me look like a qualified applicant. it's why I'm being so persistent here. These debates are why I hate categorizing activities- plenty of things can serve multiple purposes to both you and your application, labelling it only goes so far, and anybody can think anything about what " category" it goes into. It seems even ADCOMS don't always agree.
I did a lot of similar volunteering to you. I visited, called bingo, etc in a senior assisted living facility, a veterans home and a nursing home. I also was a respite care provider for hospice patients. I called the first non-clinical and the second clinical, even though they were under the same hospice provider. I separated them on my app as two distinct activities. YMMV.
 
Working in life enrichment activities- calling numbers for bingo, doing visitations in the elderly residents' rooms, playing trivia. The residents at this home are chronically sick, with physical health problems as well as dementia, and the games help support their cognitive sharpness and slow their memory decline. That's why it's not the same thing as as a senior center- these are patients who are cared for 24/7 by nurses/CNA's. It's a long term care facility with sick residents, not just old residents. Activities and life enrichment are a form of treatment for these people, that increases their quality of life. ( I'm arguing this bc it's literally the angle I'm going for in my PS, so I.is. stress.)
Edit: I really hope my work at the nursing home makes me app stand out/ ties it together/ is the main service thing that can make me look like a qualified applicant. it's why I'm being so persistent here. These debates are why I hate categorizing activities- plenty of things can serve multiple purposes to both you and your application, labelling it only goes so far, and anybody can think anything about what " category" it goes into. It seems even ADCOMS don't always agree.

In all likelihood, these folks are there because they don't have family (or the wealth) to be able to be cared for at home. I know because I have a family member who was in such a facility and I have one who is living at home with some assistance despite physical health problems and dementia.

Here's how it goes with your AMCAS application: each item in the "work and activities" section gets a tag: artistic endeavor, research, teaching & tutoring, volunteer-clinical, volunteer-nonclinical, etc. In some cases, as a reviewer is looking at your application they are looking for evidence of clinical experience, then community service/altruism, then teamwork and leadership, then research, then teaching, etc. depending on what the school is looking for in its students. Some schools will want to see evidence of service through non-clinical volunteering rather than two-birds/one-stone of only clincal volunteering with no non-clinical service to the community.

If you have other non-clinical community service with the volunteer-non-clinical tag and you have other clinical activities, do what you want but if you are hoping that nursing home work labeled as volunteer-clinical will get you points for altruism/community service, think again.

Adcoms love non-clinical volunteering particularly with the elderly. Don't be afraid that using the non-clinical tag will diminish the value placed on the work.
 
What.the.hell.
Military is the ultimate service! How is it paid employment?! I'm screaming!?

Cause we’re paid? lol the pay gets pretty decent as you rank up. I mean it definitely is service for sure. I think they wanted to see how I was directly serving my local community too.
 
In all likelihood, these folks are there because they don't have family (or the wealth) to be able to be cared for at home. I know because I have a family member who was in such a facility and I have one who is living at home with some assistance despite physical health problems and dementia.

Here's how it goes with your AMCAS application: each item in the "work and activities" section gets a tag: artistic endeavor, research, teaching & tutoring, volunteer-clinical, volunteer-nonclinical, etc. In some cases, as a reviewer is looking at your application they are looking for evidence of clinical experience, then community service/altruism, then teamwork and leadership, then research, then teaching, etc. depending on what the school is looking for in its students. Some schools will want to see evidence of service through non-clinical volunteering rather than two-birds/one-stone of only clincal volunteering with no non-clinical service to the community.

If you have other non-clinical community service with the volunteer-non-clinical tag and you have other clinical activities, do what you want but if you are hoping that nursing home work labeled as volunteer-clinical will get you points for altruism/community service, think again.

Adcoms love non-clinical volunteering particularly with the elderly. Don't be afraid that using the non-clinical tag will diminish the value placed on the work.
Honestly, calling it non clinical helps me more.
I have a year and a half of volunteer work in the hospital , got around 200 hours, and between the shadowing a got a few years ago and the shadowing I'm gonna get this summer, I have more than 200 hrs of exposure to doctors and patients. So shadowing and clinical volunteering for me are already covered.
If anything, I was worried about the my seeming, lack of community service that is non clinical. Calling my nursing home experience non clinical actually makes me more well rounded. It means I have community service, clinical volunteering, and shadowing. I have all the big things. Except research but I'm not applying anywhere where that really matters ( no T40 schools for me).
There are just a few caveats there.
-- My PS is centered around the " treating the dementia through therapy" angle that I mentioned earlier ( and then tying that into wanting to improve the quality of somebody's life through medicine) - is that still valid? My nursing home experience is still the center of my PS.
-- I asked for my non-academic LOR from them- it's a the best place for a letter of rec that can mention my good qualities that would make me a good physician, the hospital volunteer position was done in a way where I was not observed by anyone who could write me a letter. So I would have asked the nursing home for a letter anyway bc it's the best letter, but now I'm a bit worried that it doesn't count as clinical exposure so the letter may not be as important was I thought?
--- I did the hospital volunteering from halfway through soph year, through junior year, and then the summer after. I then, going into senior year, did just the nursing home work. Does it look bad that I stopped doing clinical stuff?
--- So if I put the nursing home experience down as Non clinical, and somebody perceives it as clinical, that's fine. But putting it down as clinical when it may not be seen that way is the issue? My problem is it seems subjective what it is, and most people have told me it's clinical. But if putting it down as clinical causes more potential issues, I'll put it down as non clinical.

That's all. If anything, calling my nursing home experience community service, non clinical is actually better for me. My app is more well rounded than I thought.
 
Honestly, calling it non clinical helps me more.
I have a year and a half of volunteer work in the hospital , got around 200 hours, and between the shadowing a got a few years ago and the shadowing I'm gonna get this summer, I have more than 200 hrs of exposure to doctors and patients. So shadowing and clinical volunteering for me are already covered.
If anything, I was worried about the my seeming, lack of community service that is non clinical. Calling my nursing home experience non clinical actually makes me more well rounded. It means I have community service, clinical volunteering, and shadowing. I have all the big things. Except research but I'm not applying anywhere where that really matters ( no T40 schools for me).
There are just a few caveats there.
-- My PS is centered around the " treating the dementia through therapy" angle that I mentioned earlier ( and then tying that into wanting to improve the quality of somebody's life through medicine) - is that still valid? My nursing home experience is still the center of my PS.
-- I asked for my non-academic LOR from them- it's a the best place for a letter of rec that can mention my good qualities that would make me a good physician, the hospital volunteer position was done in a way where I was not observed by anyone who could write me a letter. So I would have asked the nursing home for a letter anyway bc it's the best letter, but now I'm a bit worried that it doesn't count as clinical exposure so the letter may not be as important was I thought?
--- I did the hospital volunteering from halfway through soph year, through junior year, and then the summer after. I then, going into senior year, did just the nursing home work. Does it look bad that I stopped doing clinical stuff?
--- So if I put the nursing home experience down as Non clinical, and somebody perceives it as clinical, that's fine. But putting it down as clinical when it may not be seen that way is the issue? My problem is it seems subjective what it is, and most people have told me it's clinical. But if putting it down as clinical causes more potential issues, I'll put it down as non clinical.

That's all. If anything, calling my nursing home experience community service, non clinical is actually better for me. My app is more well rounded than I thought.

Have you considered reworking your PS to revolve around your hospital exposure instead? Somebody could easily look at the nursing home work and say "this person might not be suited for the intense environment of an operating room or emergency department."
 
Have you considered reworking your PS to revolve around your hospital exposure instead? Somebody could easily look at the nursing home work and say "this person might not be suited for the intense environment of an operating room or emergency department."
OH I'm tying it to my experience in the emergency department at the hospital. I have experience being a volunteer in the Emergency Department, bringing food/water/comfort to patients, watching doctors and nurses. Standard clinical experience. Im tying the experience at the nursing home, improving the qaulity of those patient's lives , and how I want to do that through medicine, seeing what the doctors do to care for the patients in the ED. I have demonstrated that I'm suited for an ED or other similarly "intense" medical envriromen.
The "hook" in your PS doesn't have to be a clinical experience, nor does your "most meaningful activity" on AMCAS or ACOMAS. I mean I have adequate clinical exposure and am mentioning it in my PS , but the nursing home experience is the interesting thing that sets my PS apart.
Edit: on mobile, excuse formatting. Im just questioning everything I know at this point.
 
How are unconventional answers to interview questions normally perceived? Not like weird or creepy answers, but answers that one might not expect from a typical premed interviewee.

Example: If asked about low non-clinical volunteering hours despite high clinical volunteering or clinical employment, would an answer along the lines of this sound:

"While I would like to help all of those that I can depending on my future career progression, my commitment is not to serve the under served but to serve patients regardless of their race, religion, or socioeconomic background."

Is an answer like that, while completely honest and not really an inappropriate answer, a risky answer to give?

i saw one of your post on a thread that got locked ... wondering if they will ask you why you are pursuing the physician route rather than staying as a lab tech since you had extensive experience in that profession. i went to 6 interviews last cycle and no one asked me that once or why a physican rather than a lab tech (mostly because their roles are vastly different on the healthcare team). they did ask my why a doctor rather than a PA or nurse and I was able to answer with something in the regards of having worked with all different healthcare providers in a clinical setting i wanted to be a doctor because ...." i was also use some of my stories as a lab tech to show my experience in the healthcare environment with diagnosis etc ...
 
i saw one of your post on a thread that got locked ... wondering if they will ask you why you are pursuing the physician route rather than staying as a lab tech since you had extensive experience in that profession. i went to 6 interviews last cycle and no one asked me that once or why a physican rather than a lab tech (mostly because their roles are vastly different on the healthcare team). they did ask my why a doctor rather than a PA or nurse and I was able to answer with something in the regards of having worked with all different healthcare providers in a clinical setting i wanted to be a doctor because ...." i was also use some of my stories as a lab tech to show my experience in the healthcare environment with diagnosis etc ...
Thank you for reaching out! I will definitely go that route! Most of my PS is actually about how like ‘As a lab tech I performed diagnostics, but the physician was both diagnostics and interpersonal connection.’

Nice to hear from another lab tech. Not many of us represented in the applicant pool.
 
Thank you for reaching out! I will definitely go that route! Most of my PS is actually about how like ‘As a lab tech I performed diagnostics, but the physician was both diagnostics and interpersonal connection.’

Nice to hear from another lab tech. Not many of us represented in the applicant pool.
you might be surprised there are 2 other lab techs that i know of in my incoming class with me
 
Top